Advertisement

Star Architecture’s Interplays and Effects on Cities

  • Alain ThiersteinEmail author
  • Nadia Alaily-Mattar
  • Johannes Dreher
Chapter
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter presents a conceptual impact model which can be used as a tool to research the impact of star architecture projects. We distinguish in this chapter between star architecture as a process and as an output. We use the term star architecture projects to refer to a process in which starting conditions result in the mobilisation of inputs, to produce outputs and generate effects. We regard star architecture as one such output composed of complex and dynamic bundled offerings. The effects that are generated can be plentiful, as it was explained in the various chapters of this volume. This chapter presents a conceptual impact model that was developed as a tool with a threefold purpose: (1) to analytically identify the outputs of these special projects, (2) to help assess if and how these outputs can be related to effects in a causal relationship and (3) to offer a didactic means to debate the manifold elements associated with the impact of star architecture projects.

Keywords

Bilbao effect Star architecture Flagship architecture Iconic architecture Impact Effect Impact model Multidisciplinary research 

References

  1. Alaily-Mattar N (2017) Vorzeigearchitektur und Urbane Transformation. In: Transformation findet Stadt. Internationales Städteforum Graz, Graz, pp 36–49Google Scholar
  2. Alaily-Mattar N (2018) Repositioning Cities through star architecture. Metrópolis del futuro, BilbaoGoogle Scholar
  3. Alaily-Mattar N, Dreher J, Thierstein A (2018a) Repositioning cities through star architecture: how does it work? J Urban Des 23(2):169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alaily-Mattar N, Dreher J, Wenner F, Thierstein A (2018b) Public real estate development projects and urban transformation: the case of flagship projects. In: Heurkens E, Peiser R, Squires G (eds) Companion to real estate development. Routledge, Abingdon/New York, pp 43–55Google Scholar
  5. Jencks C (2006) The iconic building is here to stay. City 10:3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Julian DA (1997) The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device. Eval Program Plann 20:251–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kellogg Foundation WK (1998) Using logic models to bring together planning, evaluation, and action. Logic Model Development Guide. Kellogg Foundation, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  8. Klingmann A (2007) Beyond Bilbao. In: Klingmann A (ed) Brandscapes, architecture in the experience economy. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Lahr ML (2001) A strategy for producing hybrid regional input-output tables. In: Lahr ML, Dietzenbacher E (eds) Input-Output analysis: frontiers and extensions. Palgrave Macmillan UK, Basingstoke, pp 211–244Google Scholar
  10. Leontief W (1986) Input-Output economics. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. McLaughlin JA, Jordan GB (1999) Logic models: a tool for telling your program’s performance story. Eval Program Plann 22:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pine BJ, Gilmore JH (1999) The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business is a stage. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Plaza B (2009) Bilbao’s Art Scene and the “Guggenheim effect” revisited. Eur Plan Stud 17:1711–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Plaza B, Haarich SN (2015) The Guggenheim museum bilbao: between regional embeddedness and global networking. Eur Plan Stud 23:1456–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Plaza B, Tironi M, Haarich SN (2009) Bilbao’s Art Scene and the “Guggenheim effect” revisited. Eur Plan Stud 17:1711–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Weiss CH (1997) How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Eval Rev 21:501–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wyatt Knowlton L, Philips CC (2013) The logic model Guidebook. Better strategies for great results. SAGE Publications Inc, Los Angeles/London/New Delhi/Singapore/Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  18. Yaneva A (2009) The making of a building. A Pragmatist Approach to Architecture. Peter Lang AG, OxfordGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alain Thierstein
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nadia Alaily-Mattar
    • 1
  • Johannes Dreher
    • 2
  1. 1.Urban DevelopmentTechnische Universität MünchenMunichGermany
  2. 2.HCU HafenCity Universität HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations