Advertisement

The Challenges of Star Architecture in Historic Cities: The Case of the Acropolis Museum in Athens

  • Maria Gravari-BarbasEmail author
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The Acropolis Museum in Athens illustrates the difficulties in reconciling the desire of star architecture projects to stand out from and the need to integrate the existing historic urban fabric. This “premium” museum was expected to firmly establish Athens among international cultural urban destinations, yet it faced significant frictions in its landing within a complex urban landscape, under the sacred rock of the Acropolis. The long-standing controversy broke out again in the summer of 2007 when this iconic building demanded the “sacrifice” of several surrounding neoclassical and Art Deco buildings in order to be fully visible. Inaugurated in 2009, the building designed by America-based Swiss architect Bernard Tschumi was indeed intended to be iconic, branded and highly visible. Based on a comprehensive overview of the press and several interviews with stakeholders, this chapter shows how political, economic or cultural goals are continually negotiable between the various actors involved in the process of star architecture making.

Keywords

Athens Acropolis Museum Heritage Iconicity Star architecture Historic city 

References

  1. Adami M (2007) Neohellenic architecture archives of the Benaki Museum. Eleytheros Typos. 5 July 2007Google Scholar
  2. Avdis L (2008) In: Rizospastis. 6 April 2008Google Scholar
  3. Beriatos E, Gospodini A (2004) “Globalising” urban landscapes: Athens and the 2004 Olympics. Cities 21(3):187–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biau V (1992) L’architecture comme emblème municipal, Plan Construction et architecture. Ministère de l’Équipement, du Logement des Transports et de l’Espace, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Central Archaeological Council (2007) Proceedings of the meeting of the Central Archaeological Council. Ministry of Culture. 3 July 2007, p 37Google Scholar
  6. Champy F (2002) Des valeurs et des pratiques de l’architecture contemporaine. Trois tentatives d’explication de la « monumentalisation » des constructions publiques In: Ville et Monument. L’Homme et la Société 145:9–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Emery J (2006) Bullring: a case study of retail-led urban renewal and its contribution to city centre regeneration. J Retail Leis Prop 5:121–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fagnoni E, Gravari-Barbas M (eds) (2015) Nouveaux musées, nouvelles ères urbaines, nouvelles pratiques touristiques. Presses Universitaires de Laval, QuebecGoogle Scholar
  9. Gospodini A (2002) European cities in competition and the new ‘uses’ of urban design. J Urban Des 7(1):59–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gravari-Barbas M (2005) Habiter le Patrimoine: Enjeux, Approches, Vécu. Presses Universitaires de Rennes. Collection Géographie Sociale, p 760Google Scholar
  11. Gravari-Barbas M (2007) The 2004 Olympic games in Athens: a critical analysis of the City’s (re)positioning on the global map. In: Guoqing D (ed) Tourism and urban transformation. Rikkyo University Press. 184 p, Tokyo, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  12. Gravari-Barbas M (2015) Architecture, Musées, Tourisme. La guerre des marque. In: Gravari-Barbas M, Renard C (eds) Figures d’Architectes et Espace Urbain/Celebrity Architects and Urban Space. L’Harmattan, pp 139–164Google Scholar
  13. Kaika M, Thielen K (2006) Form follows power. A genealogy of urban shrines. City 10(1):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kefalos J (2007) Letter of protest to the minister of culture. November 2007Google Scholar
  15. Klingman A (2007) Brandscapes: architecture in the experience economy. MIT Press, Cambridge MassGoogle Scholar
  16. Lampugnani VM, Sachs A (eds) (1999) Museums for a new millennium. Prestel, MunichGoogle Scholar
  17. Loukaki A (2008) Living ruins, value conflicts. Ashgate, PadstowGoogle Scholar
  18. Loyer F (2007) Letter of protest to the minister of culture. November 2007Google Scholar
  19. McNeil D (2005) In search of the global architect: the case of Norman Foster (and partners). Int J Urban Reg Res 29(September):501–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ockman J (2004) New politics of the spectacle: “Bilbao” and the global imagination. In: Lasansky M, McLaren B (eds) Architecture and Tourism, pp. 227–238Google Scholar
  21. Papathanassiou EO (2007) Ta Nea. 19 November 2007Google Scholar
  22. Philippopoulou-Michaēlidou E, Alivizatou C, Kalogeratou E (eds.) (1991) The New Acropolis Museum, International Architectural Competition. Ministry of Culture, Directorate of Museum StudiesGoogle Scholar
  23. Plaza B (2000) Guggenheim Museum’s effectiveness to attract tourism. Ann Tour Res 27(4):1055–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sklair L (2005) The transnational capitalist class and contemporary architecture in globalizing cities. Int J Urban Reg Res 29(3):485–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sklair L (2006) Iconic architecture and capitalist globalization. City 10(1):21–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sklair L (2017) The icon project. Architecture, cities and capitalist globalization. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  27. Supreme Court (2005) Plenary session 676/2005Google Scholar
  28. Tragganidas G (2008) Memory… ‘prevents’ the Museum from ‘breathing’. Rizospastis. 6 April 2008.Google Scholar
  29. Tschumi B (2003) “Public buildings and cityscape”. Paper presented at conference, 11 July 2003, AthensGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Aalst I (2002) From museum to mass entertainment: the evolution of the role of museums in cities. European Urban and Regional Studies 9(3):195Google Scholar
  31. Vatopoulos N (2003) Oi nostalgoi tis polykatoikias. Kathimerini. 4 May 2003Google Scholar
  32. Vatopoulos N (2007a) “The irrationality of the New Athens, Eleftherotypia, 6 June 2007Google Scholar
  33. Vatopoulos N (2007b) In: Kathimerini. 21 July 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IREST, EIREST, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-SorbonneParisFrance

Personalised recommendations