Advertisement

The Fate of the Working Class

  • Jake Lin
Chapter
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)

Abstract

This chapter examines the second factor underlying the labor movement’s psychic trap—workers’ perception of the working class identity and political power. It discusses how workers perceive the working class’s identity as somewhat obsolete and even a dirty word, especially the younger generation. Many workers instead adopt diverse modern and urbanized identities. Most workers also tend to fail to see their political capacities to make changes, together with a pessimistic sense of fatalism when it comes to their prospect of the labor movement. It also highlights the cognitive gap of perception on those issues between workers and activists. This chapter demonstrates workers’ weak collective identity and skepticism of their political efficacy through a case study in a kitchenware factory in Jiangmen Guangdong.

References

  1. Anagnost, A. (2008). From ‘class’ to ‘social strata’: Grasping the social totality in reform-era China. Third World Quarterly, 29(3), 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumer, H. (1969). Collective behavior. In A. M. Lee (Ed.), Principles of sociology (pp. 165–220). New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, W., & Kai, C. (Eds.). (2017). The emerging industrial relations of China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  4. Chan, C. K. C. (2012a). Community-based organizations for migrant workers’ rights: The emergence of labour NGOs in China. Community Development Journal, 48(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan, C. K. C. (2012b). Class or citizenship? Debating workplace conflict in China. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 42(2), 308–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang, K. (2014). The Collective transformation of labor relations and improvement of the government’s labor policy. Social Sciences in China, 35(3), 82–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edwards, J. H. (2016). The politics of language and identity: Attitudes towards Hong Kong English pre and post the Umbrella Movement. Asian Englishes, 18(2), 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ennis, J. G., & Schreuer, R. (1987). Mobilizing weak support for social movements: The role of grievance, efficacy, and cost. Social Forces, 66(2), 390–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fu, D. (2017). Mobilizing without the masses: Control and contention in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  10. Ganz, M. (2010). Leading change: Leadership, organization, and social movements. Handbook of leadership theory and practice, 19. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press. Google Scholar
  11. Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (Eds.). (2009). Passionate politics: Emotions and social movements. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  12. He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee, C. K. (2007). Against the law: Labor protests in China’s rustbelt and sunbelt. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. McAdam, D. (1982). Political process and the development of black insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. O’brien, K. J. (1996). Rightful resistance. World Politics, 49(1), 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Teets, J. C. (2014). Civil society under authoritarianism: The China model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  18. Tilly, C., & Wood, L. J. (2009). Social movements, 1768–2008 (2nd. ed.). Boulder: Paradigm Publication.Google Scholar
  19. Walder, A. G., & Xiaoxia, G. (1993). Workers in the Tiananmen protests: The politics of the Beijing workers’ autonomous federation. The Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, 29, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, J. (2015). Politics of livelihood: A new perspective on the transformation of world factories’ industrial relations. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jake Lin
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Global StudiesTokyo University of Foreign StudiesTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations