Advertisement

Business Model Innovation and Modularity: Overview of the Literature

  • Diego Honorato ClementeEmail author
  • Juliana Hsuan
  • Marly Monteiro de Carvalho
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the intersection between the constructs of modularity and business models. For this purpose, a systematic literature review was carried out, merging bibliometric and content analysis. As a result, the main research themes and gaps are identified, and a panorama of the literature is drawn. The literature within this research field is rather recent as the majority of publications have been published after 2014. Also, the theme is published sparsely in a wide range of journals as there are no dominant research outlets. Although the concept of modularity has been widely discussed in terms of product, process, and organizational levels, recent developments point out to the application of this concept to service and business models.

Keywords

Business models Modularity Bibliometrics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES), and the Foundation for Research Support of the State of São Paulo (FAPESP), for supporting this research.

References

  1. 1.
    Amit, R., Zott, C.: Value creation in E-business. Strateg. Manag. J. 22(6–7), 493–520 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aversa, P., Haefliger, S., Rossi, A., Baden-Fuller, C.: From business model to business modelling: modularity and manipulation. Bus. Models Model. 33, 151–185 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Avlonitis, V., Hsuan, J.: Exploring modularity in services: cases from tourism. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37(6), 771–790 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baden-Fuller, C., Morgan, M.S.: Business models as models. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 156–171 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bask, A., Lipponen, M., Rajahonka, M., Tinnilä, M.: The concept of modularity: diffusion from manufacturing to service production. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 21(3), 355–375 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., Wagner, M.: Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J. Clean. Prod. 45, 1–8 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brax, S.A., Bask, A., Hsuan, J., Voss, C.: Service modularity and architecture—an overview and research agenda. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37(6), 686–702 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Campagnolo, D., Camuffo, A.: The concept of modularity in management studies: a literature review. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 12(3), 259–283 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Carvalho, M.M., Fleury, A., Lopes, A.P.: An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): contributions and trends. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang 80(7), 1418–1437 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Casadesus-Masanell, R., Ricart, J.E.: From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 195–215 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cenamor, J., Sjödin, D.R., Parida, V.: Adopting a platform approach in servitization: leveraging the value of digitalization. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 192, 54–65 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chesbrough, H.: Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 354–363 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chesbrough, H., Rosenbloom, R.: The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Ind. Corp. Change 11(3), 529–555 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christensen, C.M., Verlinden, M., Westerman, G.: Disruption, disintegration and the dissipation of differentiability. Ind. Corp. Change 11(5), 955–993 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Demil, B., Lecocq, X.: Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3): 227–246 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eisenhardt, K.M., Martin, J.A.: Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg. Manag. J. 21, 1105–1121 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Elo, S., Kyngäs, H.: The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 62(1), 107–115 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Frandsen, T.: Evolution of modularity literature: a 25-year bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 37(6), 703–747 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gärtner, C., Schön, O.: Modularizing business models: between strategic flexibility and path dependence. J. Strategy Manag. 9(1), 39–57 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A.: Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strateg. Manag. J. 16(S1), 93–109 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Handel, P., Ohlsson, J., Ohlsson, M., Skog, I., Nygren, E.: Smartphone-based measurement systems for road vehicle traffic monitoring and usage-based insurance. IEEE Syst. J. 8(4), 1238–1248 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Henderson, R.M., Clark, K.B.: Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Adm. Sci. Q. 35(1), 9–30 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hessel, V., Cravotto, G., Fitzpatrick, P., Patil, B.S., Lang, J., Bonrath, W.: Industrial applications of plasma, microwave and ultrasound techniques: nitrogen-fixation and hydrogenation reactions. Chem. Eng. Process. 71, 19–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Homrich, A.S., Galvão, G., Abadia, L.G., Carvalho, M.M.: The circular economy umbrella: trends and gaps on integrating pathways. J. Clean. Prod. 175, 525–543 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Langlois, R.N., Robertson, P.L.: Networks and innovation in a modular system: lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries. Res. Policy 21(4), 297–313 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leurent, M., Jasserand, F., Locatelli, G., Palm, J., Rämä, M., Trianni, T.: Driving forces and obstacles to nuclear cogeneration in Europe: lessons learnt from Finland. Energy Policy 107, 138–150 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meier, H., Völker, O., Funke, B.: Industrial product-service systems (IPS2): paradigm shift by mutually determined products and services. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 52(9–12), 1175–1191 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mikkola, J.H.: Capturing the degree of modularity embedded in product architectures. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 23(2), 128–146 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mikkola, J.H.: Management of product architecture modularity for mass customization: modeling and theoretical considerations. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 54(1), 57–69 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mikkola, J.H., Gassmann, O.: Managing modularity of product architectures: toward and integrated theory. Trans. Eng. Manag. 50(2), 1–15 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Oliva, R., Kallenberg, R.: Managing the transition from products to services. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 14(2), 160–172 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ray, P.K., Ray, S.: Resource-constrained innovation for emerging economies: the case of the Indian telecommunications industry. Eng. Manag., IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 57(1), 144–156 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Richter, M.: German utilities and distributed PV: how to overcome barriers to business model innovation. Renew. Energy 55, 456–466 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Salvador, F., Forza, C., Rungtusanatham, M.: Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: theorizing beyond generic prescriptions. J. Oper. Manag. 20(5), 549–575 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schilling, M.A.: Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. The Acad. Manag. Rev. 25(2), 312–334 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schilling, M.A., Steensma, H.K.: The use of modular organizational forms: an industry-level analysis. Acad. Manag. J. 44(6), 1149–1168 (2001)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sherwood, J.: SALSA: a method for developing the enterprise security architecture and strategy. Comput. Secur. 15(5), 501–506 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Snihur, Y., Tarzijan, J.: Managing complexity in a multi-business-model organization. Long Range Plan. 51(1), 50–63 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spring, M., Araujo, L.: Service, services and products: rethinking operations strategy. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 29(5), 444–467 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sturgeon, T.J.: Modular production networks: a new American model of industrial organization. Ind. Corp. Change 11(3), 451–496 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Teece, D.J.: Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plan. 43(2–3), 172–194 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tsvetkova, A., Gustafsson, M.: Business models for industrial ecosystems: a modular approach. J. Clean. Prod. 29–30, 246–254 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ulrich, K.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy 24(3), 419–440 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Voss, C.A., Hsuan, J.: Service architecture and modularity. Decis. Sci. 40(3), 541–569 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zott, C., Amit, R.: Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 18(2), 181–199 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zott, C., Amit, R.: The fit between product market strategy and business model: implications for firm performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 29(1), 1–26 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zott, C., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37(4), 1019–1042 (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diego Honorato Clemente
    • 1
    Email author
  • Juliana Hsuan
    • 2
  • Marly Monteiro de Carvalho
    • 1
  1. 1.University of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Copenhagen Business SchoolFrederiksbergDenmark

Personalised recommendations