Advertisement

Wildland Fire, Extreme Weather and Society: Implications of a History of Fire Suppression in California, USA

  • Donald SchweizerEmail author
  • Tom Nichols
  • Ricardo Cisneros
  • Kathleen Navarro
  • Trent Procter
Chapter

Abstract

Wildland fire is a natural process integral to the formation and health of forest ecosystems globally. California, USA, is case study where large areas of wildland have a recent 100 plus year history of human suppression of fire that with extreme weather is combining to create large high intensity burns changing both species composition and increasing threats to life, health and property. The cool wet winters and hot dry summers in California produce a climate where fire is common and many environmental systems have evolved to rely on frequent fire for reproduction and health. Fire has been systemically removed creating a backlog of fuels as vegetation normally burned accumulates. Extreme weather enhanced by climate change is increasing the duration of the fire season and occurrence of extreme fire weather and events. The abundance of fuels and increase in probability of fire, primarily due to human-caused ignitions in the wildland–urban interface, are creating an increase of large catastrophic fires not typical of these ecosystems. These large high-intensity fires are an immediate threat to life and property, produce large amounts of smoke impacting human health far from the fire, and leave behind a burn area then susceptible to extreme rainfall events that create landslides and mudslides. Returning fire to the historic role it has played in sustaining these systems reduces the probability of catastrophic fire and the conditions where extreme rainfall can additionally cause further threats to life and property from debris flows. Exposure of the public to smoke from wildfire increases when high intensity burns occur. Wildland fire typical of this ecosystem which occurred before suppression limited the extent and amount of such exposure. There are current attempts to effect positive change to policy and give a voice to the role of fire in the ecosystem. Long-standing policy based on the unsustainable complete exclusion of fire and public pressure on air quality inhibits functional change to smoke and fire management. The collision of what current fire and smoke science advises as the appropriate action (inclusion of fire as a land management tool), and public opinion driving implementation of fire management decisions in California (the exclusion of fire) illustrates a global problem where climate change and policy driven by belief are synergistically worsening environmental and human health.

Keywords

Wildland fire Extreme weather Smoke management policy 

References

  1. Bladon, K. D., Emelko, M. B., Silins, U., & Stone, M. (2014). Wildfire and the future of water supply. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 8936–8943.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es500130g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boer, M. M., Nolan, R. H., Resco De Dios, V., Clarke, H., Price, O. F., & Bradstock, R. A. (2017). Changing weather extremes call for early warning of potential for catastrophic fire. Earth’s Future, 5, 1196–1202.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2017EF000657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cal Fire. (2018). California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Statistics and Events [WWW Document]. http://cdfdata.fire.ca.gov/incidents/incidents_statsevents. Accessed July 9, 2018.
  4. Calkin, D. E., Thompson, M. P., & Finney, M. A. (2015). Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management. Forest Ecosystems, 2, 9.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-015-0033-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cisneros, R., & Schweizer, D. W. (2018). The efficacy of news releases, news reports, and public nuisance complaints for determining smoke impacts to air quality from wildland fire. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 11, 423–429.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0545-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cisneros, R., Brown, P., Cameron, L., Gaab, E., Gonzalez, M., Ramondt, S., et al. (2017). Understanding public views about air quality and air pollution sources in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2017, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4535142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cisneros, R., Alcala, E., Schweizer, D., & Burke, N. (2018a). Smoke complaints caused by wildland fire in the southern Sierra Nevada region, California. International Journal of Wildland Fire.  https://doi.org/10.1071/wf18060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cisneros, R., Schweizer, D., Tarnay, L., Navarro, K., Veloz, D., Trent Procter, C., et al. (2018b). Climate change, forest fires, and health in California. In R. Akhtar & C. Palagiano (Eds.), Climate change and air pollution (pp. 99–130). Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61346-8_8.Google Scholar
  9. Dowdy, A. J. (2018). Climatological variability of fire weather in Australia. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 57, 221–234.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-17-0167.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterling, D. R., Evans, J. L., Groisman, P. Y., Karl, T. R., Kunkel, K. E., & Ambenje, P. (2000). Observed variability and trends in extreme climate events: A brief review. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 81, 417–425.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2000)081%3c0417:OVATIE%3e2.3.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finney, M. A., Seli, R. C., Mchugh, C. W., Ager, A. A., Bahro, B., & Agee, J. K. (2006). Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires. In P. L. Andrews & B. W. Butler (comps) Fuels Management: How to Measure Success: Conference Proceedings. 28–30 March 2006, Portland, OR. Proceedings of RMRS-P-41. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain.Google Scholar
  12. Flannigan, M., Cantin, A. S., De Groot, W. J., Wotton, M., Newbery, A., & Gowman, L. M. (2013). Global wildland fire season severity in the 21st century. Forest Ecology and Management, 294, 54–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gauthier, S., Bernier, P., Kuuluvainen, T., Shvidenko, A. Z., & Schepaschenko, D. G. (2015). Boreal forest health and global change. Science, 349, 819–822.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haugo, R., Zanger, C., DeMeo, T., Ringo, C., Shlisky, A., Blankenship, K., et al. (2015). A new approach to evaluate forest structure restoration needs across Oregon and Washington. Forest Ecology and Management, 335, 37–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.09.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hutto, R. L., Keane, R. E., Sherriff, R. L., Rota, C. T., Eby, L. A., & Saab, V. A. (2016). Toward a more ecologically informed view of severe forest fires. Ecosphere, 7, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Keeley, J. E., McGinnis, T. W., & Bollens, K. A. (2005). Seed germination of Sierra Nevada postfire chaparral species. Madrono, 52, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kilgore, B. M. (1973). The ecological role of fire in Sierran conifer forests. Its application to National Park management. Quaternary Research, 3, 496–513.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0033-5894(73)90010-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirchmeier-Young, M. C., Zwiers, F. W., Gillett, N. P., & Cannon, A. J. (2017). Attributing extreme fire risk in Western Canada to human emissions. Climatic Change, 144, 365–379.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2030-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klocke, D., Schmitz, A., & Schmitz, H. (2011). Fire-adaptation in Hypocerides nearcticus Borgmeier and Anabarhynchus hyalipennis hyalipennis Marquart and New Notes about the Australian “Smoke Fly” Microsania australis Collart (Diptera: Phoridae, Therevidae and Platypezidae). The Open Entomology Journal, 5, 10–14.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1874407901105010010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Littell, J. S., Mckenzie, D., Peterson, D. L., & Westerling, A. L. (2009). Climate and wildfire area burned in western U.S. Climate and wildfire. Ecological Applications, 19, 1003–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu, Y., Stanturf, J., & Goodrick, S. (2010). Trends in global wildfire potential in a changing climate. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 685–697.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Navarro, K. M., Schweizer, D., Balmes, J. R., & Cisneros, R. (2018). A review of community smoke exposure from wildfire compared to prescribed fire in the United States. Atmosphere (Basel), 9.  https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9050185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NIFC. (2018). National Interagency Fire Center [WWW Document]. http://www.nifc.gov/fireInfo/fireInfo_main.html. Accessed March 4, 2016.
  24. North, M. P., Stephens, S. L., Collins, B. M., Agee, J. K., Aplet, G., Franklin, J. F., et al. (2015). Reform forest fire management. Science, 349, 1280–1281.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parmeter, J. R., Jr., & Uhrenholdt, B. (1975). Some Effects of Pine-Needle or Grass Smoke on Fungi. Phytopathology, 65, 28–31. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-65-28.
  26. Preisler, H., Schweizer, D., Cisneros, R., Procter, T., Ruminski, M., & Tarnay, L. (2015). A statistical model for determining impact of wildland fires on Particulate Matter (PM 2.5) in Central California aided by satellite imagery of smoke. Environmental Pollution, 205, 340–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.06.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reid, C. E., Brauer, M., Johnston, F. H., Jerrett, M., Balmes, J. R., & Elliott, C. T. (2016). Critical review of health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, 124, 1334–1343.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1409277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ren, D., Fu, R., Leslie, L. M., & Dickinson, R. E. (2011). Modeling the mudslide aftermath of the 2007 Southern California wildfires. Natural Hazards, 57, 327–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-010-9615-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schweizer, D., & Cisneros, R. (2014). Wildland fire management and air quality in the southern Sierra Nevada: Using the Lion Fire as a case study with a multi-year perspective on PM2.5 impacts and fire policy. Journal of Environmental Management, 144, 265–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schweizer, D. W., & Cisneros, R. (2017). Forest fire policy: Change conventional thinking of smoke management to prioritize long-term air quality and public health. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 10, 33–36.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-016-0405-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schweizer, D., Cisneros, R., Traina, S., Ghezzehei, T. A., & Shaw, G. (2017). Using National Ambient Air Quality Standards for fine particulate matter to assess regional wildland fire smoke and air quality management. Journal of Environmental Management, 201, 345–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Steel, Z. L., Safford, H. D., & Viers, J. H. (2015). The fire frequency-severity relationship and the legacy of fire suppression in California forests. Ecosphere, 6, 8.  https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00224.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stephens, S. L., Martin, R. E., & Clinton, N. E. (2007). Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California’s forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands. Forest Ecology and Management, 251, 205–216.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stephens, S. L., Burrows, N., Buyantuyev, A., Gray, R. W., Keane, R. E., Kubian, R., et al. (2014). Temperate and boreal forest mega-fires: Characteristics and challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 115–122.  https://doi.org/10.1890/120332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stephens, S. L., Collins, B. M., Fettig, C. J., Finney, M. A., Hoffman, C. M., Knapp, E. E., et al. (2018). Drought, tree mortality, and wildfire in forests adapted to frequent fire. Bioscience, 68, 77–88.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sugihara, N. G., Van Wagtendonk, J. W., Fites-Kaufman, J., Shaffer, K. E., & Thode, A. E. (2006). Fire in California’s ecosystems, First ed. University of California Press.Google Scholar
  37. Thomas, P. B., Morris, E. C., & Auld, T. D. (2007). Response surfaces for the combined effects of heat shock and smoke on germination of 16 species forming soil seed banks in South-east Australia. Austral Ecology, 32, 605–616.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01730.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thonicke, K., Venevsky, S., Sitch, S., & Cramer, W. (2008). The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: Coupling fire into a Dynamic Global Vegetation Model. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 10, 661–677.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00175.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Schweizer
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Tom Nichols
    • 3
  • Ricardo Cisneros
    • 2
  • Kathleen Navarro
    • 4
  • Trent Procter
    • 5
  1. 1.Pacific Southwest Region, USDA Forest ServiceBishopUSA
  2. 2.Public Health Graduate Group, Health Sciences Research InstituteUniversity of CaliforniaMercedUSA
  3. 3.EagleUSA
  4. 4.USDA Forest Service, Manti-La Sal National ForestPriceUSA
  5. 5.USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest RegionVallejoUSA

Personalised recommendations