For a Personal Foundation

  • Joshua Rasmussen


This chapter begins our inquiry into whether the foundation of existence is personal. Rasmussen seeks to uncover relevant clues. The bulk of the chapter is about four clues: (i) organized complexity, (ii) consciousness, (iii) morality, and (iv) reason. Rasmussen gives a Bayesian assessment of each of these and suggests why they independently point to a common root: intentional powers of a foundational mind. Rasmussen then adds a new, deductive argument for the same result. This argument is an extension of his argument from arbitrary limits. This deduction follows a path from (i) no arbitrary, unexplained limits, to (ii) a maximally powerful foundation, and then to (iii) a foundation with intentional powers.


Fine-tuning Personal foundation Foundational mind Organized complexity Argument from reason Argument from consciousness 


  1. Collins, Robin. 2003. “God, Design, and Fine-Tuning.” In God Matters: Readings in the Philosophy of Religion, edited by R. M. Bernard, 54–65. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  2. Jaworski, William. 2016. “Why Materialism Is False, and Why It Has Nothing to Do with the Mind.” Philosophy 91 (2): 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Lightman, Alan. 2011. “The Accidental Universe.” Harper’s.
  4. Rasmussen, Joshua. 2018. “Against Non-reductive Physicalism.” In The Blackwell Companion to Substance Dualism, edited by Jonathan J. Loose, Angus J. L. Menuge, and J. P. Moreland, 328–339. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Ross, James. 2008. Thought and World: The Hidden Necessities. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  6. Wagner, A. 2014. Arrival of the Fittest: Solving Evolution’s Greatest Puzzle. New York: Penguin. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Rasmussen
    • 1
  1. 1.Azusa Pacific UniversityAzusaUSA

Personalised recommendations