Traversing the Doctorate: Situating Scholarship and Identifying Issues
The scholarship attending doctoral study and supervision is growing rapidly, yet in many ways successful approaches to traversing the doctorate remain idiosyncratic, even mysterious. Accordingly, it is timely to situate the terrain occupied by that scholarship, and to identify the accompanying issues and proposed strategies for engaging with those issues. This situating and identification draw on literature about doctoral study and supervision distilled from the sometimes divergent perspectives of students, supervisors and administrators. The chapter also outlines the book’s structure and organising questions, and explains the techniques for maximising its rigour. From that perspective, traversing the doctorate emerges as a fundamentally worthwhile, yet complex and multifaceted, enterprise that warrants ongoing evaluation and continuing professionalisation.
- Dahan, A. (2007, September). Supervision and schizophrenia: The professional identity of Ph.D supervisors and the mission of students’ professionalisation. European Journal of Education: Research, Development and Policy, 42(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00310.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fulton, J., & Hayes, C. (2017, April). Evaluating retrospective experiential learning as process in scholarship on a work based professional doctorate. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 11, 1–24. Retrieved from http://journal.aldinhe.ac.uk/index.php/jldhe/article/view/255.
- Humphrey, R., Marshall, N., & Leonardo, L. (2012, January). The impact of research training and research codes of practice on submission of doctoral degrees: An exploratory cohort study. Higher Education Quarterly, 66(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00499.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson, S., Nicola, M., & Hobson, J. (2018). Flying start: Partnering with students and other stakeholders to support the transition into doctoral study. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 12(1), A168–A178.Google Scholar
- Pifer, M. J., & Baker, V. L. (2016). Stage-based challenges and strategies for support in doctoral education: A practical guide for students, faculty members, and program administrators. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 15–34. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e7fa/78ff28d790855f48b0a3a331340d56a51e68.pdf.
- Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., Spaulding, L. S., & Spaulding, M. T. (2016, October). Identifying significant integration and institutional factors that predict online doctoral persistence. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 101–112.Google Scholar
- Smeltzer, S. C., Sharts-Hopko, N. C., Cantrell, A., Heverly, M. A., Wise, N., & Jenkinson, A. (2017, November–December). Perceptions of academic administrators of the effect of involvement in doctoral programs on faculty members’ research and work-life balance. Nursing Outlook, 65(5), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.04.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar