Advanced Power Conversion System for Small Modular Reactors

  • Bahman Zohuri
  • Patrick McDaniel


The major growth in the electricity production industry in the last 30 years has centered on the expansion of natural gas power plants based on gas turbine cycles. The most popular extension of the simple Brayton gas turbine has been the combined cycle power plant with the open Air-Brayton cycle serving as the topping cycle and the steam Rankine cycle serving as the bottoming cycle for new generation of nuclear power plants that are known as GEN-IV. The Air-Brayton cycle is an open-air cycle and the Steam-Rankine cycle is a closed cycle. The Air-Brayton cycle for a natural gas-driven power plant must be an open cycle, where the air is drawn in from the environment and exhausted with the products of combustion to the environment. This technique is suggested as an innovative approach to GEN-IV nuclear power plants in the form and type of small modular reactors (SMRs). The hot exhaust from the Air-Brayton cycle passes through a heat recovery steam generator (HSRG) prior to exhausting to the environment in a combined cycle. The HRSG serves the same purpose as a boiler for the conventional Steam Rankine cycles.


  1. 1.
    American Nuclear Society. 2019. Nuclear News, 21st Reference Issue, March.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buongiorno, J, M. Corradini, J. Parsons, and D. Petti, Co-Chairs. 2018. The Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon-Constrained World, an Interdisciplinary Study, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zohuri, B., and P. McDaniel. 2018. Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants, An Innovative Design Approach. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wakil, M.M. 1984. Powerplant Technology. New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dostal, V., M.J. Driscoll, and P.A. Hejzlar. 2004. A Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Cycle for Next Generation Nuclear Reactors, Tech Rep MIT-ANP-TR-100, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waltar, A.E., D.R. Todd, and P.V. Tsvetkov, eds. 2012. Fast Spectrum Reactors. New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wilson, D.G., and T. Korakianitis. 1998. The Design of High-Efficiency Turbomachinery and Gas Turbines. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentis-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Korpela, S.A. 2011. Principles of Turbomachinery. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blumberg, T., M. Assar, T. Morosuk, and G. Tsatsaronis. 2017. Comparative exergoeconomic Evaluation of The Latest Generation of Combined-Cycle Power Plants. In Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 153, 616–626. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kays, W.M., and A.L. London. 1998. Compact Heat Exchangers. 3rd ed. Malabar: Krieger Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bahman Zohuri
    • 1
  • Patrick McDaniel
    • 2
  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Chemical and Nuclear Engineering DepartmentUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations