Advertisement

The Gender Effects of a Basic Income

  • Annie Miller
  • Toru Yamamori
  • Almaz ZellekeEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee book series (BIG)

Abstract

Miller, Yamamori and Zelleke explore the gender effects of a Basic Income through a survey of feminist theories of distributive justice, critiques of the gendered effects of welfare state policies, welfare claimants’ movements in the UK and US, and empirical evidence from cash transfer pilots. They examine debates over the potential emancipatory effects of a Basic Income for women, concerns about its effects on the gendered division of labour, and evidence of increased well-being, especially for women and girls, exhibited by Negative Income Tax and cash transfer experiments. They conclude that the effects of a Basic Income are likely to be positive for women and men across a range of measures, while specific outcomes would depend on the details of any particular Basic Income scheme.

References

  1. Abelda, R. and the Women’s Committee of One Hundred. (2004). An immodest proposal. Feminist Economics, 10(2), 251–258.Google Scholar
  2. Amenta, E. (2006). When movements matter: The Townsend plan and the rise of social security. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, A. (1996). The case for a participation income. The Political Quarterly, 67(1), 67–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, J. (2008). All things considered, should feminists embrace Basic Income? Basic Income Studies, 3(3).  https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1129.
  6. Bergmann, B. (1998). The only ticket to equality: Total androgyny, male style. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 9, 75–86.Google Scholar
  7. Bergmann, B. (2000). Subsidising child care by mothers at home. Feminist Economics, 6(1), 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bergmann, B. (2006). A Swedish-style welfare state or Basic Income: Which should have priority? In E. O. Wright (Ed.), Redesigning distribution: Basic Income and stakeholder grants as cornerstones for an egalitarian capitalism (pp. 130–142). New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  9. Brapsstacks, B. (pseudonym) (1972). The confusion of Swansea: A little light on the G.A.I. (Unpublished material).Google Scholar
  10. British Library, Sisterhood and After Research Team. (2013). Women’s liberation: A national movement. https://www.bl.uk/sisterhood/articles/womens-liberation-a-national-movement. Accessed 30 July 2018.
  11. Dalla Costa, M., & James, S. (1972). The power of women and the subversion of community. London: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
  12. Davala, S., Jhabvala, R., Kapoor Mehta, S., & Standing, G. (2015). Basic Income: A transformative policy for India. London, New Delhi and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  13. DHSS. (1971). Cohabitation: The administration of the relevant provisions of the Ministry of Social Security Act 1966: Report by the Supplementary Benefits Commission to the Secretary of State for Social Services. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  14. Dworkin, R. (2000). Sovereign virtue: The theory and practice of equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Elgarte, J. (2008). Basic Income and the gendered division of labour. Basic Income Studies, 3(3).  https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1136.
  16. Federation of Claimants Unions. (1985). Women and social security. Birmingham: Federation of Claimants Unions.Google Scholar
  17. Federici, S. (1975). Wages against housework. Bristol, UK: Falling Wall Press.Google Scholar
  18. Federici, S. (2012). Revolution at point zero: Housework, reproduction, and feminist struggle. Oakland, CA: PM Press.Google Scholar
  19. Forget, E. L. (2011). The town with no poverty: The health effects of a Canadian Guaranteed Annual Income field experiment. Canadian Public Policy/Analyse de Politiques, 37(3), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forget, E. L. (2012). Canada: The case for Basic Income. In M. Murray & C. Pateman (Eds.), Basic Income worldwide: Horizons of reform (pp. 81–101). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraser, N. (1997). After the family wage: A postindustrial thought experiment. In N. Fraser (Ed.), Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the ‘postsocialist’ condition (pp. 41–66). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Glenn, E. N. (1992). From servitude to service work: Historical continuities in the racial division of paid reproductive labor. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18(1), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. F. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Haarmann, C., Haarmann, D., Jauch, H., Shindondola-Mote, H., Nattrass, N., Samson, M., & Standing, G. (2008). Towards a Basic Income Grant for all: Basic Income pilot project assessment report. Namibia: Namibian Basic Income Grant Coalition. http://www.bignam.org/Publications/BIG_Assessment_report_08a.pdf. Accessed 14 Feb 2019.
  25. Hirschman, L. (2006). Get to work: A manifesto for women of the world. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  26. Hum, D., & Simpson, W. (1993). Economic response to a Guaranteed Annual Income: Experience from Canada and the United States. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1), Part 2, S263–S296.Google Scholar
  27. Kennedy, H. (1993). Eve was framed: Women and British justice. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  28. Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Kornbluh, F. (2007). The battle for welfare rights: Politics and poverty in modern America. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  30. Marinescu, I. (2018). No strings attached: The behavioral effects of U.S. unconditional cash transfer programs (NBER Working Paper No. 24337). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w24337. Accessed 5 Mar 2019.
  31. McKay, A. (2005). The future of social security policy: Women, work and a Citizens’ Basic Income. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller, A. (2017). A Basic Income handbook. Edinburgh: Luath Press.Google Scholar
  33. Mink, G. (1995). Wage work, family work, and welfare politics. Feminist Economics, 1(2), 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nadasen, P. (2005). Welfare warriors: The welfare rights movement in the United States. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Nadasen, P. (2012). Rethinking the welfare rights movement. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. National Federation of Claimants Unions. (1970). Journal of the national federation of claimants unions. Birmingham: National Federation of Claimants Unions.Google Scholar
  37. National Federation of Claimants Unions. (c. 1977–1978). Social security and women. Birmingham: National Federation of Claimants Unions.Google Scholar
  38. Okin, S. M. (1989). Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Oksala, J. (2016). Affective labor and feminist politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 41(2), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker, H. (1989). Instead of the dole: An enquiry into integration of the tax and benefit systems. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Pateman, C. (2006). Democratizing citizenship: Some advantages of a Basic Income. In E. O. Wright (Ed.), Redesigning distribution: Basic Income and stakeholder grants as cornerstones for an egalitarian capitalism (pp. 101–119). New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  42. Ranalli, B. (2015). Historical precedents for Basic Income advocacy: The Townsend movement (USBIG Discussion Paper 257). https://usbig.net/papers/Ranalli%202015%20Townsend%20Movement%20version%204-25-17.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2018.
  43. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rhys-Williams, J. (1943). Something to look forward to: A suggestion for a new social contract. London: Macdonald and Co.Google Scholar
  46. Roebyns, I. (2000). Hush money or emancipation fee? A gender analysis of Basic Income. In R. van der Veen & L. Groot (Eds.), Basic Income on the agenda: Policy objectives and political chances (pp. 121–136). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rothstein, J. (2010). Is the EITC as good as a NIT? Conditional cash transfers and tax incidence. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 2(1), 177–208.Google Scholar
  48. Rowbotham, S. (1989). The past is before us: Feminism in action since the 1960s. London: Pandora Press.Google Scholar
  49. Salkind, N. J., & Haskins, R. (1982). Negative Income Tax: The impact on children from low-income families. Journal of Family Issues, 3(2), 165–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sloman, P. (2016). Beveridge’s rival: Juliet Rhys-Williams and the campaign for Basic Income, 1942–55. Contemporary British History, 30(2), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steensland, B. (2008). The failed welfare revolution: America’s struggle over Guaranteed Income policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Swansea Minutes. (1972). Minutes of conference on guaranteed adequate income campaign, Swansea, May 27–28, 1972.Google Scholar
  53. Tillmon, J. (1972). Welfare is a women’s issue. Ms. Magazine. http://www.msmagazine.com/spring2002/tillmon.asp. Accessed 14 Feb 2019.
  54. Toupin, L. (2018). Wages for housework: A history of an international feminist movement, 1972–77. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  55. Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Weeks, K. (2011). The problem with work: Feminism, Marxism, antiwork politics, and postwork imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Welsh, J. (1973, January 7). Welfare reform: Born Aug. 8, 1969; Died, Oct. 4, 1972: A sad case study of the American political process. New York Times Magazine, p. 14.Google Scholar
  58. White, S. (2003). The civic minimum: On the rights and obligations of economic citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Widerquist, K. (2005). A failure to communicate: What (if anything) can we learn from the Negative Income Tax experiments? Journal of Socio-Economics, 34(1), 49–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yamamori, T. (2014). A feminist way to unconditional Basic Income: Claimants unions and women’s liberation movements in 1970s Britain. Basic Income Studies, 9(1–2), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zelleke, A. (2008). Institutionalizing the universal caretaker through a Basic Income? Basic Income Studies, 3(3).  https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0183.1133.
  62. * 11 April 2019: Warning for Users of the Spare Rib Jisc Archive – possible suspension of access. This warning has been updated to reflect the further extension to the deadline for the UK to exit the EU to 31 October 2019. See our news item for further details. We regret to inform you that if the UK leaves the EU without a deal on the 31 October 2019 the full run of the feminist magazine Spare Rib, hosted on the Jisc Journal Archives platform and digitised by the British Library, will no longer be available. We know this resource is used by researchers, activists, students and teachers, not only in the UK but around the world and greatly regret the possible need to suspend the resource. We are sorry for the disruption and disappointment this will cause if it proves necessary. Information about why the Spare Rib online resource may have to be closed down can be found on the British Library’s website.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Citizen’s Basic Income Trust, UKEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Doshisha UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.NYU ShanghaiShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations