Advertisement

Introduction

  • David Morris
Chapter

Abstract

The aim of this opening chapter is to identify the pedagogical motivation which led to the study presented in this book—and the subsequent premise that there needs to be a step change in terms of recognising how pupils may support their teachers with their professional development activity. The bodies of literature which are of relevance here concern student voice and teacher professional development (TPD), and their significance is briefly outlined before presenting the research setting, the research questions and the data collection methods used. A brief section follows which provides a lexicon of the terminology used in this book before ending with outlines of the remaining chapters.

Keywords

Student voice Teacher professional development Information and Communication Technology Action research 

References

  1. Appledawn School. (2013). School Brochure. Essex: Appledawn School.Google Scholar
  2. Barber, M., Whelan, F., & Clark, M. (2010). Capturing the Leadership Premium: How the World’s Top School Systems Are Building Leadership Capacity for the Future. London: McKinsey & Company.Google Scholar
  3. Barbour, R. S., & Schostak, J. (2005). Interviewing and Focus Groups. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research Methods in the Social Sciences (pp. 41–48). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Batchelor, D. C. (2006). Vulnerable Voices: An Examination of the Concept of Vulnerability in Relation to Student Voice. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(6), 787–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beadle, H. (2016). Delivering the Future Workforce: A Highlighting of the Need to Focus on the Relationship Between School Teachers and Technology. TEAN Journal, 8(1), 106–115.Google Scholar
  6. Becta. (2008). Harnessing Technology Review 2008: The Role of Technology and Its Impact on Education: Full Report. Coventry: Becta.Google Scholar
  7. Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2010). Beyond the “Digital Natives” Debate: Towards a More Nuanced Understanding of Students’ Technology Experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bragg, S. (2007). “Student Voice” and Governmentality: The Production of Enterprising Subjects? Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caena, F. (2011). Literature Review: Quality in Teachers’ Continuing Professional Development. European Commission, June 2011. Online: http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/doc/teacher-development_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Apr 2019.
  11. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research Methods in Education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Cordes, C., & Miller, E. (Eds.). (2000). Fool’s Gold: A Critical Look at Computers in Childhood. College Park: Alliance for Childhood.Google Scholar
  14. Cordingley, P., Bell, M., Rundell, B., & Evans, D. (2003). The Impact of Collaborative CPD on Classroom Teaching and Learning. In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, University of London.Google Scholar
  15. Creswell, J. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. D’Andrea, K. C. (2013). Trust: A Master Teacher’s Perspective on Why It Is Important: How to Build It and Its Implications for MBE Research. Mind, Brain and Education, 7(2), 86–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deacon, D., Pickering, M., Golding, P., & Murdock, G. (1999). Researching Communications: A Practical Guide to Methods in Media and Cultural Analysis. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  18. Demetriou, H., & Wilson, E. (2010). Children Should Be Seen and Heard: The Power of Student Voice in Sustaining New Teachers. Improving Schools, 13(1), 54–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Denscombe, M. (2007). The Good Research Guide (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. DfE [Department for Education]. (2013). The National Curriculum in England. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  21. DfE [Department for Education]. (2016). Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development. London: DfE.Google Scholar
  22. DfES [Department for Education and Skills]. (1999). The National Curriculum. London: QCA.Google Scholar
  23. EdFutures. (2018). EdFutures. Online: http://edfutures.net/. Accessed 5 Apr 2019.
  24. Fielding, M. (2010). The Radical Potential of Student Voice: Creating Spaces for Restless Encounters. The International Journal of Emotional Education, 2(1), 61–73.Google Scholar
  25. Fielding, M. (2011). Student Voice and the Possibility of Radical Democratic Education. In G. Czerniawski & W. Kidd (Eds.), The Student Voice Handbook: Bridging the Academic/Practitioner Divide (pp. 3–17). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  26. Fielding, M. (2016). Why and How Schools Might Live Democracy “As an Inclusive Human Order”. In S. Higgins & F. Coffield (Eds.), John Dewey’s Education and Democracy: A British Tribute (pp. 114–130). London: UCL IOE Press.Google Scholar
  27. Gamliel, T., & Hazan, H. (2014). ‘Digital Natives’: Honour and Respect in Computerised Encounters Between Israeli Jewish and Arab Children and Adult Learners. British Education Research Journal, 40(5), 886–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodall, J., Day, C., Lindsay, G., Muijs, G., & Harris, A. (2005). Evaluating the Impact of Continuing Professional Development (CPD). London: Department for Education and Skills.Google Scholar
  29. Goodman, J. F., & Eren, N. S. (2013). Student Agency: Success, Failure and Lessons Learned. Ethics and Education, 8(2), 123–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gu, X., Zhu, Y., & Guo, X. (2013). Meeting the “Digital Natives”: Understanding the Acceptance of Technology in Classrooms. Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 392–402.Google Scholar
  31. Gunter, H. M., & Thomson, P. (2007). Learning About Student Voice. Support for Learning, 22(4), 181–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart, R. (1992). Children’s Participation: From Tokenism to Citizenship. Florence: UNICEF International Child Development Centre.Google Scholar
  33. Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The Impact of Primary School Teachers’ Educational Beliefs on the Classroom Use of Computers. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1499–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hollingworth, S., Mansaray, A., Allen, K., & Rose, A. (2011). Parents’ Perspectives on Technology and Children’s Learning in the Home: Social Class and the Role of the Habitus. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 247–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Johnson, N. F. (2009). The Multiplicities of Internet Addiction: The Misrecognition of Leisure and Learning. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  36. Kitchen, S., Finch, S., & Sinclair, R. (2007). Harnessing Technology Schools Survey 2007. Coventry: Becta.Google Scholar
  37. Kolodinsky, J., Cranwell, M., & Rowe, E. (2002). Bridging the Generation Gap Across the Digital Divide: Teens Teaching Internet Skills to Senior Citizens. Journal of Extension, 40(3).Google Scholar
  38. Lavery, S. D., & Hine, G. S. C. (2013). Catholic School Principals: Promoting Student Leadership. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 17(1), 41–66.Google Scholar
  39. Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007). Distributing Leadership to Make Schools Smarter: Taking the Ego Out of the System. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6(1), 37–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lundt, J., & Vanderpan, T. (2000). It Computes When Young Adolescents Teach Senior Citizens. Middle School Journal, 31(4), 18–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCormick, R., Banks, F., Morgan, B., Opfer, D., Pedder, D., Storey, A., & Wolfenden, F. (2008). Literature Review Report: Schools and Continuing Professional Development in England. London: Training and Development Agency [TDA].Google Scholar
  42. McNiff, J., Lomax, P., & Whitehead, J. (2002). You and Your Action Research Project. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Mitra, D. (2004). The Significance of Students: Can Increasing “Student Voice” in Schools Lead to Gains in Youth Development? Teachers College Record, 106(4), 651–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mitra, D., & Gross, S. J. (2009). Increasing Student Voice in High School Reform: Building Partnerships, Improving Outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(4), 522–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mitra, D., Serriere, S., & Stoicovy, D. (2012). The Role of Leaders in Enabling Student Voice. Management in Education, 26(3), 104–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitra, D., Serriere, S., & Kirshner, B. (2014). Youth Participation in U.S. Contexts: Student Voice Without a National Mandate. Children and Society, 28, 292–304.Google Scholar
  47. NCSL [National College for School Leadership]. (2010). Distributed Leadership. Nottingham: NCSL.Google Scholar
  48. ONS [Office for National Statistics]. (2011). Neighbourhood Statistics. Online http://www.neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/. Accessed 5 Apr 2019.
  49. Pachler, N., Preston, C., Cuthell, J., Allen, A., & Pinheiro-Torres, C. (2010). ICT CPD Landscape: Final report. Coventry: Becta.Google Scholar
  50. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ritchie, R., & Woods, P. (2007). Degrees of Distribution: Towards an Understanding of Variations in the Nature of Distributed Leadership in Schools. School Leadership & Management, 27(4), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Royal Society. (2012). Shut Down or Restart? The Way Forward for Computing in UK Schools. London: The Royal Society.Google Scholar
  53. Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting Pupils About Teaching and Learning. In NCSL (Ed.), Learning Texts (pp. 80–92). Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  54. Rudduck, J. (2005). Pupil Voice Is Here to Stay. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority [QCA].Google Scholar
  55. Smyth, J. (2006). ‘When Students Have Power’: Student Engagement, Student Voice, and the Possibilities for School Reform Around ‘Dropping Out of School’. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(4), 285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Taines, C. (2014). Educators and Youth Activists: A Negotiation Over Enhancing Students’ Role in School Life. Journal of Educational Change, 15, 153–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teo, T., Yurdakul, I., & Ursavaş, Ö. (2016). Exploring the Digital Natives Among Pre-service Teachers in Turkey: A Cross-Cultural Validation of the Digital Native Assessment Scale. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1231–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher Professional Learning and Development. In J. Brophy (Ed.), The Educational Practices Series – 18. Brussels: International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education.Google Scholar
  60. Walliman, N. (2006). Social Research Methods. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zuppo, C. M. (2012). Defining ICT in a Boundaryless World: The Development of a Working Hierarchy. International Journal of Managing Information Technology, 4(3), 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Morris
    • 1
  1. 1.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations