Advertisement

The Potential Gully Erosion Risk Mapping of River Dulung Basin, West Bengal, India Using AHP Method

  • Kishor Dandapat
  • Rajkumar Hazari
  • Gouri Sankar Bhunia
  • Pravat Kumar Shit
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Rill and gully erosion are an important morphological feature of lateritic terrain in Jhargram District, a part of rolling topography of Chhotonagpur Plateau. The present work took the River Dulung basin’s rill and gully erosion as a study and used analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to extract the anatomical line of rill and gullies. This chapter analyzes the probable risk patches of rill and gullies along the River Dulung basin. To evaluate the risk zone of rill and gully erosion, eight biophysical variables were selected. The analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and weighted linear combination (WLC) were considered to functionalize the conceptual model within a geographic information system (GIS) framework. Results revealed that 2.74 km2 of the study area falls into the very high-risk zone; 201.18 km2 area comes under high-risk zone; 570.04 km2 area falls into moderate risk zone; 111.63 km2 area comes under the low-risk zone and 0.226 km2 area falls into the very low-risk zone.

Keywords

Gully erosion GIS Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) Weighted linear combination (WLC) Risk estimation 

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay S (1998) Drainage Evolution in Badland Terrain at Gangani in Medinipur District, West Bengal. Geogr Rev India 50 (3): 10–20Google Scholar
  2. Berger C, Schulze M, Rieke-Zapp D et al., (2010) Rill development and soil erosion: A laboratory study of slope and rainfall intensity. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35(12): 1456–1467. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1989 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford J M, Ferris J E, Remley P E (1987) Interrill soil erosion processes: I. Effect of surface sealing on infiltration, runoff, and soil splash detachment. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 51(6): 1566–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryan R B, Poesen J (1989) Laboratory experiment on the influence of slope length on runoff, percolation and rill development. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 14(3): 211–231. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290140304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cerdan C, Le Bissonnais Y, Couturier A et al., (2002) Rill erosion on cultivated hillslopes during two extreme rainfall events in Normandy, France. Soil & Tillage Research, 67(1): 99–108. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00045-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cevik E, Topal T (2003) GIS-based landslide proneness mapping for a problematic segment of the natural gas pipeline, Hendlok (Turkey). Environ Geol 44:949–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai FC, Lee CF et al (2001) Assessment of landslide proneness on the natural terrain of Lantau Island, Hang Kong. Environment Geol 40:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dandapat K; Panda G.K (2017) Flood vulnerability analysis and risk assessment using analytical hierarchy process. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 3:1627. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0388-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairbridge, R.W (1968) -The Encyclopedia of Geomorphology. Reinhold, New York, 1295 pp.Google Scholar
  10. FAO (2017) The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome. 180 pp. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6583e.pdf
  11. Fekete A, Damm M, Birkmann J (2010) Scales as a challenge for vulnerability assessment. Nat Hazard 55(3):729–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gessesse G D, Fuchs H, Mansberger R et al., (2010) Assessment of erosion, deposition and rill development on irregular soil surfaces using close range digital photogrammetry. The Photogrammetric Record, 15(131): 299–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghosh, S, Bhattacharya, K (2012). Multivariate erosion risk assessment of lateritic badlands of Birbhum (West Bengal, India): A case study. J. Earth Syst. Sci. 121(6): 1441–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Govers G, Giménez R, Oost K V (2007) Rill erosion: Exploring the relationship between experiments, modelling and field observations. Earth-Science Reviews, 84(3–4): 87–102. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carscirev.2007.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hessel R, Jetten V (2007) Suitability of transport equations in modelling soil erosion for a small Loess Plateau catchment.Google Scholar
  16. Indian Census (2011) http://censusindia.gov.in/
  17. Lal, R (1992) Restoring land degradation by Gully Erosion in the tropics. Adv. Soil Sci., 17:123–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Liu B Y, Nearing M A, Rise L M (1994) Slope gradient effects on soil loss for steep slopes. Transactions of the ASAE, 37(6): 1835–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20(7):703–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Merritt W S, Letcher R A, Jakeman A J. (2003) A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 18(8–9): 761–799. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00078-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ownegh, M. (1996). The role of geomorphology in soil erosion and land degradation assessment. Proc. Inter. Conf. on Land Degradation, 10–14 June 1996, Adana, Turkey, p 31–32Google Scholar
  22. Ramanathan R (2001) A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment, Journal of Environmental Management, 63(1), 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rieke-Zapp D H, Nearing M A (2005) Slope shape effects on erosion: A laboratory study. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 69(5): 1463–1471. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Satty, T. (1980) The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Shit PK, Paira R, Bhunia G, Maiti R (2015) Modeling of potential gully erosion hazard using geo-spatial technology at Garbheta block, West Bengal in India. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. (2015) 1:2 DOI  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-015-0001-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vrieling A (2006) Satellite remote sensing for water erosion assessment: A review. Catena, 65(1): 2–18. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2005.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang G (1998) Summary of rill erosion study. Soil and Water Conservation in China, (8): 23–26. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Wang K, Shangguan Z (2012) Simulating the vegetation-producing process in small watersheds in the Loess Plateau of China. Journal of Arid Land, 4(3): 300–309. doi:  https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1227.2012.00300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wirtz S, Seeger M, Ries J B (2012) Field experiments for understanding and quantification of rill erosion processes. Catena, 91(s1): 21–34. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yoon DK (2012) Assessment of social vulnerability to natural disasters: a comparative study. Nat Hazard 63(2):823–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kishor Dandapat
    • 1
  • Rajkumar Hazari
    • 2
  • Gouri Sankar Bhunia
    • 3
  • Pravat Kumar Shit
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of GeographySeva Bharati MahavidyalayaKapgari, Jhargram DistrictIndia
  2. 2.Onze Technologies (India) Private LimitedBengaluruIndia
  3. 3.Aarvee Associates Architects, Engineers & Consultants Pvt. LtdHyderabadIndia
  4. 4.Department of GeographyRaja N. L. Khan Women’s College (Autonomous)MedinipurIndia

Personalised recommendations