Advertisement

Modeling of Gully Erosion Based on Random Forest Using GIS and R

  • Amiya Gayen
  • Sk. Mafizul Haque
  • Sunil Saha
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Generally, gully erosion and its areal extension is a natural process fully controlled by external forces and shaped by internal settings. It adversely impacts soil productivity, eco-system function, and quality of environment as it affects land and water quality. For the development of sustainable land utilization strategy, it is initially required to develop an effective management process. This study aims to develop a gully erosion potentiality map using a well-known machine learning algorithm, that is, random forest (RF) model in the River Bakulla basin area, Jharkhand, India. In this work, 12 gully erosion predisposing factors (i.e., altitude, plan curvature, slope length, land use, soil types, slope gradient, topographical wetness index, distance from river, drainage density, distance from road, and distance from lineament) were selected based on available data and literature review. Finally, the gully erosion susceptibility map (GESM) generated by the RF model and the output was validated by employing the unused gully locations with ROC curve. The predicted results reveal that RF model has high prediction accuracy; the AUC value was 91% at end of the analysis. RF-generated GESM can be a very useful tool for the management action and land improvement measures in initial stages of gully development, to protect the development of gully erosion.

Keywords

Random forest Area under the curve Gully erosion susceptibility Machine learning model 

References

  1. Arekhi, S., Niazi, Y., Kalteh, A.M., 2012. Soil erosion and sediment yield modelling using RS and GIS techniques: a case study, Iran. Arab J Geosci 5, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balamurugan, G., Seshan, K., Bera, S., 2017. Frequency ratio model for groundwater potential mapping and its sustainable management in cold desert, India. Journal of King Saud University Science, 29 (3), 333–347.Google Scholar
  3. Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine learning, 45(1), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buttafuoco, G., Conforti, M., Aucelli, P.P., Robustelli, G., Scarciglia, F., 2011. Assessing spatial uncertainty in mapping soil erodibility factor using geostatistical stochastic simulation. Environmental Earth Sciences 66 (4), 1111–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Catani, F., Lagomarsino, D., Segoni, S. Tofani, V., 2013. Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13(11), 2815–2831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, W., Chen, W., Li, H., Hou, E., Wang, S., Wang, G., Peng, T., 2018. GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models. Science of the Total Environment, 634, 853–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, W., Panahi, M., Tsangaratos, P., Shahabi, H., Ilia, I., Panahi, S., Ahmad, B.B., 2019. Applying population-based evolutionary algorithms and a neuro-fuzzy system for modeling landslide susceptibility. Catena 172, 212–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conforti, M., Aucelli, P.P., Robustelli, G., Scarciglia, F., 2010. Geomorphology and GIS analysis for mapping gully erosion susceptibility in the Turbolo stream catchment (Northern Calabria, Italy). Natural Hazards 56 (3), 881–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conoscenti, C., Angileri, S., Cappadonia, C., Rotigliano, E., Agnesi, V., Ma¨rker, M., 2014. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment by means of GIS-based logistic regression: a case of Sicily (Italy). Geomorphology 204 (1), 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Conoscenti, C., Maggio, C.D., Rotigliano, E., 2008. Soil erosion susceptibility assessment and validation using a geostatistical multivariate approach: a test in Southern Sicily. Natural Hazards 46 (3), 287–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dube, F., Nhapi, I., Murwira, A., Gumindoga, W., Goldin, J., Mashauri, D.A., 2014. Potential of weight of evidence modelling for gully erosion hazard assessment in Mbire District—Zimbabwe. Phys. Chem. Earth 67, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Egan, J.P. Signal detection theory and ROC-analysis. New York: Academic Press. 1975.Google Scholar
  13. Gayen, A., Pourghasemi, H.R., 2019. Spatial Modeling of Gully Erosion: A New Ensemble of CART and GLM Data-Mining Algorithms. Spatial Modeling in GIS and R for Earth and Environmental Science. pp. 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gayen, A., Saha, S., 2017. Application of weights-of-evidence (WoE) and evidential belief function (EBF) models for the delineation of soil erosion vulnerable zones: a study on Pathro river basin, Jharkhand, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 3 (3), 1123–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gayen, A., Saha, S., 2018. Deforestation probable area predicted by logistic regression in Pathro river basin: a tributary of Ajay River. Spatial Information Research 26 (1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gayen, A., Saha, S., Pourghasemi, H.R., 2019a. Soil erosion Assessment using RUSLE model and its Validation by FR probability model. Geocarto International. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1581272
  17. Gayen, A., Pourghasemi, H.R., Saha, S., Keesstra, S. Bai, S., 2019b. Gully erosion susceptibility assessment and management of hazard-prone areas in India using different machine learning algorithms. Science of the Total Environment. 668, 124–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Golkarian, A., Naghibi, S.A., Kalantar, B. Pradhan, B., 2018. Groundwater potential mapping using C5.0, random forest, and multivariate adaptive regression spline models in GIS. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 190(3), 149Google Scholar
  19. Gomez Gutierrez, A., Schnabel, S., Felicisimo, A.M., 2009. Modelling the occurrence of gullies in rangelands of southwest Spain. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 34, 1894–1902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hongchun, Z.H.U., Guoan, T., Kejian, Q., Haiying, L., 2014. Extraction and analysis of gully head of loess plateau in china based on digital elevation model. Chin Geographical Sci. 24 (3), 328–338.Google Scholar
  21. Hoyos, N., 2005. Spatial modeling of soil erosion potential in a tropical watershed of the Colombian Andes. Catena 63, 85–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kim, J.C., Lee, S., Jung, H.S. Lee, S., 2018. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest and boosted tree models in Pyeong-Chang, Korea. Geocarto international, 33(9), 1000–1015.Google Scholar
  23. Magesh, N.S., Chandrasekar, N. Soundranayagam, J.P., 2012. Delineation of groundwater potential zones in Theni district, Tamil Nadu, using remote sensing, GIS and MIF techniques. Geoscience Frontiers, 3(2), 189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore, I.D., Burch, G.J., 1986. Physical basis of the length-slope factor in the universal soil loss equation 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50(5), 1294–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moore, I.D., Grayson, R.B. and Ladson, A.R., 1991. Digital terrain modelling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrological processes, 5(1), 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Naghibi, S.A., Pourghasemi, H.R., Razaei, A., 2015. Groundwater qanat potential mapping using frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy models in the Moghan watershed, Iran. Earth Sci. Information 8, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naghibi, S.A., Pourghasemi, H.R. Dixon, B., 2016. GIS-based groundwater potential mapping using boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and random forest machine learning models in Iran. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 188(1), 44.Google Scholar
  28. Naghibi, S.A., Ahmadi, K. Daneshi, A., 2017. Application of support vector machine, random forest, and genetic algorithm optimized random forest models in groundwater potential mapping. Water Resources Management, 31(9), 2761–2775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narayan, D.V.V., Babu, R., 1983. Estimation of soil erosion in India. J. Irrig. Drain. Engng. ASCE 109(4), 419-435.Google Scholar
  30. Poesen, J., Nachtergaele, J., Verstraeten, G., Valentin, C., 2003. Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs. Catena 50 (2–4), 91–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pourghasemi, H.R., Yousefi, S., Kornejady, A., Cerdà, A., 2017. Performance assessment of individual and ensemble data-mining techniques for gully erosion modeling. Science of The Total Environment 609, 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Development Core Team, 2005. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, www.Rproject.orgGoogle Scholar
  33. Rahmati, O., Haghizadeh, A., Pourghasemi, H.R., Noormohamadi, F., 2016. Gully erosion susceptibility mapping: the role of GIS-based bivariate statistical models and their comparison. Natural Hazards 82 (2), 1231–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Regmi, N.R., Giardino, J.R., McDonald, E.V. and Vitek, J.D., 2016. A review of mass movement processes and risk in the critical zone of Earth. In Developments in Earth Surface Processes, 19, 319–362.Google Scholar
  35. Svoray, T., Michailov, E., Cohen, A., Rokah, L., Sturm, A., 2012. Predicting gully initiation: comparing data mining techniques, analytical hierarchy processes and the topographic threshold. Earth surf. Process. Landforms 37, 607–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Torri, D., Borselli, L., 2003. Equation for high-rate gully erosion. Catena 50 (2–4), 449–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Youssef, A.M., Pourghasemi, H.R., Pourtaghi, Z. S., Al-Katheeri, M. M., 2016. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Landslides, 13(5), 839–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zabihi, M., Mirchooli, F., Motevalli, A., Darvishan, A.K., Pourghasemi, H.R., Zakeri, M.A., Sadighi, F., 2018. Spatial modelling of gully erosion in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran. Catena 161, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amiya Gayen
    • 1
  • Sk. Mafizul Haque
    • 1
  • Sunil Saha
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of Gour BangaMaldaIndia

Personalised recommendations