Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of Multi Controller Software Defined Network Architecture on Mininet

  • B. M. RashmaEmail author
  • G. Poornima
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 80)

Abstract

The traditional network lacks flexibility when network needs to be scaled-up or scaled-down as it completely relies on hardware components like routers and switches. This can be solved by a paradigm technology SDN (Software Defined Networks). SDN facilitate network administrators to decouple control plane from data plane, and logically centralize control functions in a software controller. Proposed work in this paper is a rapid SDN prototyping of Single Controller (SC) and Multi Controller (MC) architecture on mininet, a programming flexible simulator. The emulation displays a Multi-Controller (MC) SDN architecture which improves efficiency and exhibits competence in handling scalable network on contrary to Single-Controller (SC) architecture. The proposed work demonstrates defining user defined controller on inbuilt Open Flow controller which also brings intra-cluster and inter-cluster communication in a hierarchical network. We empirically ratify the scalability of network by increasing number of host nodes.

Keywords

Mininet Multi controller OpenFlow Ethernet Round Trip Time (RTT) 

References

  1. 1.
    McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., Shenker, S., Turner, J.: OpenFlow: enabling innovation in campus networks. In: ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communications Review, Apr 2008Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coto, J.: A holistic presentation and recommendation of OpenFlow its challenges and future research needed. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 5(10) (Oct 2015). ISSN 2250-3153Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jarschel, M., Oechsner, S., Schlosser, D., Pries, R., Goll, S., Tran-Gia, P.: Modeling and performance evaluation of an Openflow architecture. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Teletraffic Congress (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Oliveira, R.L.S., Shinoda, A.A., Schweitzer, C.M., Prete, L.R.: Using mininet for emulation and prototyping software-defined networks. In: Communications and Computing (COLCOM), INSPEC Accession Number: 14468968, IEEE Xplore: 21 July 2014Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wang, F., Wang, H., Lei, B., Ma, W.: A research on carrier-grade SDN controller. In: 2014 International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data, 978-1-4799-6621-91/14 $31.00 ©2014 IEEE.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ccbd.2014.41
  6. 6.
    Metter, C., Seufert, M., Wamser, F., Zinner, T., Tran-Gia, P.: Analytical model for SDN signaling traffic and flow table occupancy and its application for various types of traffic. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang, Z., Yeung, K.L.: An efficient flow monitoring scheme for SDN networks. 978-1-5090-5538-8/17/$31.00 ©2017 IEEEGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwartz, C., Hossfeld, T., Lehrieder, F., Tran-Gia, P.: Angry apps: the impact of network timer selection on power consumption, signalling load, and web QoE. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huang, H., Zhu, J., Zhang, L.: An SDN_based management framework for IoT devices. ISSC 2014/CIICT 2014, Limerick, June 26–27Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, G., Kim, J., Lee, S.: An SDN based fully distributed NAT traversal scheme for IoT global connectivity. ICTC 2015, 978-1-4673-7116-2/15/$31.00 ©2015 IEEEGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sahoo, K.S., Sahoo, B., Panda, A.: A secured SDN framework for IoT. In: 2015 International Conference on Man and Machine Interfacing (MAMI)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heller, B., Sherwood, R., McKeown, N.: The controller placement problem. In: HotSDN’12, August 13, 2012, Helsinki, Finland. Copyright 2012 ACM 978-1-4503-1477-0/12/08Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tootoonchian, A., Gorbunov, S., Casado, M., Sherwhood, R.: On controller performance in software-defined networks. In: HotSDN’12, 13 Aug 2012, Helsinki, Finland. Copyright 2012 ACM 978-1-4503-1478-0/12/08Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferguson, A.D., Guha, A., Liang, C., Fonseca, R., Krishnamurthi, S.: Hierarchical policies for software defined networks. In: HotSDN’12, 13 Aug 2012, Helsinki, Finland. Copyright 2012 ACM 978-1-4503-1477-0/12/08Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thorat, P., Raza, S.M., Kim, D.S., Choo, H.: Rapid recovery from link failures in software-defined networks. J. Commun. Netw. 19(6), 648–665 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PESIT Bangalore South CampusBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.B.M.S. College of EngineeringBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations