Advertisement

Development of a Remote Tube Bending Lab to Illustrate Springback and Determine Process Limits

  • Siddharth UpadhyaEmail author
  • Alessandro Selvaggio
  • Tobias R. Ortelt
  • Joshua Grodotzki
  • Erman A. Tekkaya
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 80)

Abstract

The benefits of remote labs in overcoming the time and accessibility constraints of conventional labs is well known. To complement the already existing labs at the IUL, a remote tube bending lab incorporating an industry-relevant process was developed to aid in the understanding of important process limits and features of profile bending. The remote lab was developed in a bottom-to-top approach where the underlying tube bending lab was conceptualized and developed keeping in mind the best way to educate the students. Based on a problem based learning approach, the lab gives the students the freedom to explore and discover the field of tube bending on their own. The state of the art bending machine, with open platform communication (OPC) capabilities, coupled with a dedicated specimen handling robot, allows for easy automation of the lab while the use of augmented reality and web cameras facilitate easy visualization of the process and the product.

Keywords

Remote laboratory Engineering education Forming technology Laboratory learning 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was done as part of the “ELLI2—Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Science” and the authors are grateful to the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for funding the work (project no.: 01PL16082C).

References

  1. 1.
    Global Metal Forming Market for Automotives 2018-2025Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corter, J.E., Nickerson, J.V., Esche, S.K., Chassapis, C., Im, S., Ma, J.: Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories. ACM Trans Comput-Human Interaction 14.2 (2 2007), 1–27 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Araujo, A.S., Araújo, A.S., Cardoso, A.M., Cardoso, A.M.: Pedagogical effectiveness of a remote lab for experimentation in Industrial Electronics. In: 2009 3rd IEEE International Conference on E-Learning in Industrial Electronics (ICELIE), pp. 104–108. Porto (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ortelt, T.R., Sadiki, A., Pleul, C., Becker, C., Chatti, S., Tekkaya, A.E.: Development of a tele-operative testing cell as a remote lab for material characterization. In: 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), pp. 977–982. Dubai (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engineering Education 4.0—Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences, Springer International Publishing AG (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    VDI 3430: Rotary draw bending of profiles June (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, H., Yang, H., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z.: Size effect related bending formability of thin walled aluminum alloy tube. Chin J Aeronaut 26(1), 230–241 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biggs, J.: Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High. Educ. 32(3), 347–364 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kolb, A.D.: Experiential Learning: Experience as the source of Learning and Development (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., Allen, D.E. (eds.): The Power of Problem-Based Learning. Stylus, Sterling, VA (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wills, T.W., Estow, S., Soraci, S.A., Garcia, J.: The AHA effect in groups and other dynamic learning contexts. J General Psychol 133(3), 221–236 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siddharth Upadhya
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alessandro Selvaggio
    • 1
  • Tobias R. Ortelt
    • 1
  • Joshua Grodotzki
    • 1
  • Erman A. Tekkaya
    • 1
  1. 1.IUL, TU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations