Advertisement

Learning Through Experiences: Accessible Fabricated Dioramas for the Visually Impaired

  • Myrsini SamaroudiEmail author
  • Karina Rodriguez Echavarria
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1044)

Abstract

This paper investigates digitally fabricated replicas and how these contribute as novel interpretative means to support visitor experiences in cultural heritage contexts. The paper’s main contribution is the evaluation of the experience that visually impaired users had with a 3d printed relief of a Victorian environmental display, or diorama, from the Booth Museum of Natural History in Brighton (UK) along with a pervasive audio mobile application. Our intention is to illuminate the subtleties, interests and learning through experiences with objects and supporting interpretative applications in the cultural heritage sector.

Keywords

Digital fabrication 3D printing Environmental displays Dioramas Visually impaired Museums Audience research 

References

  1. 1.
    Anagnostakis, G., Antoniou, M.: Accessible museum collections for the visually impaired: combining tactile exploration, audio descriptions and mobile gestures. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct, Italy, pp. 1021–1025 (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arts Council England: Inspiring Learning for All (2014). http://www.artscouncil.org.uk/advice-and-guidance
  3. 3.
    Balletti, C., Ballarin, M., Guerra, F.: 3D printing: state of the art and future perspectives. J. Cult. Herit. 26, 172–182 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Candlin, F.: Museums, modernity and the class politics of touching objects. In: Chatterjee, H.J. (ed.) Touch in Museums: Policy and Practice in Object Handling. Berg, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carfagni, M., Furferi, R., Governi, L., Volpe, Y., Tennirelli, G.: Tactile representation of paintings: an early assessment of possible computer based strategies. In: Ioannides, M., Fritsch, D., Leissner, J., Davies, R., Remondino, F., Caffo, R. (eds.) EuroMed 2012. LNCS, vol. 7616, pp. 261–270. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, G., Zhang, Y., Chen, N.S., Fan, Z.: Context-aware ubiquitous learning in science museum with ibeacon technology. In: Spector, M., Lockee, B., Childress, M. (eds.) Learning, Design, and Technology, pp. 1–24. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_5-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chou, S.c., et al.: Semantic web technologies for context-aware museum tour guide applications, pp. 2–7 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Design for All Foundation: Design for All Foundation. http://designforall.org/
  9. 9.
    Diamond, J., Horn, M., Uttal, D.H.: Practical Evaluation Guide: Tools for Museums and Other Informal Educational Settings. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Economou, M.: Heritage in the digital age. In: Logan, W., Craith, M.N., Kockel, U. (eds.) A Companion to Heritage Studies, Chap. 15. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Falk, J.: Museum audiences: a visitor-centered perspective. Loisir et Societe 39(3), 357–370 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Falk, J.H., Dierking, L.D.: The Museum Experience, 1st edn. Whalesback Books, Washington, D.C. (1992)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Falk, J.H., Dierking, L.D.: The Museum Experience Revisited, 1st edn. Left Coast Press Inc., Walnit Creek (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Falk, J.H., Moussouri, T., Coulson, D.: The effect of visitors agendas on museum learning. Curator Mus. J. 41(2), 107–120 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hein, G.E.: John dewey and museum education. Curator Mus. J. 47(4), 413–427 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    MacDonald, S.: Exploring the role of touch in connoisseurship and the identification of objects. In: Pye, E. (ed.) The Power of Touch: Handling Objects in Museum and Heritage Contexts. Left Coast Press Inc., California (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mota, C.: The rise of personal fabrication. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition, C&C 2011, p. 279 (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neely, L., Langer, M.: Please feel the museum: the emergence of 3D printing and scanning. museums and the web 2013 (2013). http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/please-feel-the-museum-the-emergence-of-3d-printing-and-scanning/
  19. 19.
    Neumüller, M., Reichinger, A., Rist, F., Kern, C.: 3D printing for cultural heritage: preservation, accessibility, research and education. In: Ioannides, M., Quak, E. (eds.) 3D Research Challenges in Cultural Heritage. LNCS, vol. 8355, pp. 119–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44630-0_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Parry, R.: The end of the beginning: normativity in the postdigital museum. Mus. Worlds 1, 24–39 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reichinger, A., Fuhrmann, A., Maierhofer, S., Purgathofer, W.: Gesture-based interactive audio guide on tactile reliefs. In: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility - ASSETS 2016. pp. 91–100 (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reichinger, A., Maierhofer, S., Purgathofer, W.: High-quality tactile paintings. J. Comput. Cult. Herit. (JOCCH) 4(2), 1–13 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reichinger, A., Schröder, S., Löw, C., Sportun, S., Reichl, P., Purgathofer, W.: Spaghetti, sink and sarcophagus: design explorations of tactile artworks for visually impaired people. In: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction - NordiCHI 2016, pp. 1–6 (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Royal Pavilion & Museums: Mr Booth and his Museum (2012). https://brightonmuseums.org.uk/discover/2012/11/07/
  25. 25.
    Samaroudi, M., Echavarria, K.R., Song, R., Evans, R.: The fabricated diorama: Tactile relief and context-aware technology for visually impaired audiences. In: Eurographics Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage. The Eurographics Association, Graz (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Scopigno, R., Cignoni, P., Pietroni, N., Callieri, M., Dellepiane, M.: Digital fabrication technologies for cultural heritage (STAR). In: Santos, P., Klein, R. (eds.) 12th Eurographics Workshops on Graphics and Cultural Heritage (EG GCH 2014), pp. 75–85. Eurographics Association (2014)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scopigno, R., Cignoni, P., Pietroni, N., Callieri, M., Dellepiane, M.: Digital fabrication technologies for cultural heritage: a survey. Comput. Graph. Forum 36(1), 1–17 (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wonders, K.: Habitat dioramas as ecological theatre. Eur. Rev. 1(3), 285–300 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Myrsini Samaroudi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Karina Rodriguez Echavarria
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Secure, Intelligent and Usable SystemsUniversity of BrightonBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations