Advertisement

Presence Is the Key to Understanding Immersive Learning

  • Andreas DengelEmail author
  • Jutta Mägdefrau
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1044)

Abstract

Presence as the subjective feeling of ‘being there’ is one of the main psychological components in immersive virtual environments. Research shows that presence can have an effect on learning outcomes in educational virtual environments. As presence can be considered as an individual psychological variable, its crucial role in the process of immersive learning is influenced by numerous subjective and objective factors. On the basis of the Educational Framework for Immersive Learning (EFiL), we developed a research model including the factors presence, immersion, cognitive abilities, motivation, and emotion. The hypotheses of the research model have been examined in a study with 23 students testing three different immersive educational virtual environments for learning computer science. The results of 67 presence questionnaires could confirm the hypotheses of the research model deriving from the EFiL partly. The factors immersion, emotion, and cognitive abilities were predictors for presence. An assumed, predictive effect of intrinsic motivation towards learning computer science on presence could not be verified.

Keywords

Immersive learning Presence Educational virtual environments Virtual reality Immersion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The SKILL project is part of the “Qualitätsoffensive Lehrerbildung”, a joint initiative of the Federal Government and the Länder which aims to improve the quality of teacher training. The programme is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The authors are responsible for the content of this publication.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailenson, J.N., Beall, A.C., Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Turk, M.: Transformed social interaction, augmented gaze, and social influence in immersive virtual environments. Hum. Commun. Res. 31, 511–537 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailey, J., Bailenson, J.N., Won, A.S., Flora, J.: Presence and memory: immersive virtual reality effects on cued recall. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Presence Research Annual Conference, 24–26 October, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biocca, F.: The Cyborg’s dilemma progressive embodiment in virtual environments. In: Humane Interfaces: Questions of Method and Practice in Cognitive Technology. Human Factors in Information Technology, Amsterdam, vol. 13, pp. 113–144 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dengel, A., Mägdefrau, J.: Immersive learning explored: subjective and objective factors influencing learning outcomes in immersive educational virtual environments. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Wollongong, Australia, pp. 608–615 (2018)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dewey, J.: Observation and Information. How We Think, pp. 188–200. D.C. Heath, Lexington (1910)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hanfstingl, B., Andreitz, I., Thomas, A., Müller, F.H.: Evaluationsbericht Schüler- und Lehrerbefragung 2008/09. Interner Arbeitsbericht. Klagenfurt, Institut für Unterrichts-und Schulentwicklung (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Helmke, A., Weinert, F.: Bedingungsfaktoren schulischer Leistungen. Max-Planck-Inst. für Psychologische Forschung (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jennett, C., et al.: Measuring and defining the experience of immersion in games. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 66(9), 641–661 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee, E.A.-L., Wong, K.W., Fung, C.C.: How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1424–1442 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee, K.M.: Presence, explicated. Commun. Theory 14(1), 27–50 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, J.-W. Duh, H., Parker, D.E., Abi-Rached, H., Furness, T.A.: Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2002, Los Alamitos, California, USA 164–171 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mania, K., Chalmers, A.: The effects of levels of immersion on memory and presence in virtual environments. A reality centered approach. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 4(2), 247–264 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mikropoulos, T.A.: Presence: a unique characteristic in educational virtual environments. Virtual Reality 10(3–4), 197–206 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nichols, S., Haldane, C., Wilson, J.R.: Measurement of presence and its consequences in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 52, 471–491 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peck, T.C., Fuchs, H., Whitton, M.C.: Evaluation of reorientation techniques and distractors for walking in large virtual environments. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics 15(3), 383–94 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pekrun, R.: A Social-Cognitive, Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotions. Motivational Psychology of Human Development. J. Heckhausen, Ed. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 143–163 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Price, M., Anderson, P.: The role of presence in virtual reality exposure therapy. J. Anxiety Disord. 21, 742–751 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roy, M., Schlemminger, G.: Immersion und Interaktion in virtuellen Realitäten: Der Faktor Präsenz zur Optimierung des geleiteten Sprachenlernens. Zeitschrift für interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht. Didaktik und Methodik im Bereich Deutsch als Fremdsprache, 19(2), 187–201 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schubert, T., Friedmann, F., Regenbrecht, H.: The experience of presence: factor analytic insights. Presence 10(3), 266–281 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Slater, M.: A note on presence terminology. Presence Connect 3, 1–5 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Slater, M., Usoh, M.: Steed: depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 3, 130–144 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality. Dimensions determining telepresence. J. Commun. 42(4), 73–93 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Titz, W.: Emotionen von Studierenden in Lernsituationen: Explorative Analysen und Entwicklung von Selbstberichtskalen (367). Waxmann, Münster, New York, München, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., Blais, M.R., Brière, N.M., Senécal, C., Vallières, E.F.: The academic motivation scale: a measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 52, 1003–1017 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 7(3), 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yeonhee, C.: The Impact of Interaction in Virtual Reality Language Learning as Active Learning. Korean Educational Research Association, New York (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Computer Science and MathematicsUniversity of PassauPassauGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Arts and HumanitiesUniversity of PassauPassauGermany

Personalised recommendations