Advertisement

Immersive Virtual Environments and Learning Assessments

  • Anna Carolina Muller QueirozEmail author
  • Alexandre Moreira Nascimento
  • Romero Tori
  • Maria Isabel da Silva Leme
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1044)

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic literature review is to give a state-of-the-art overview of how learning assessments have been used in studies using Immersive Virtual Environment (IVE) and its applications in education. Forty-six studies were reviewed and categorized according to: type of knowledge, technological immersion, skills learned, context, techniques, processes and methods of assessment. This review identified scarcity of studies focusing conceptual knowledge assessment, few studies using qualitative assessments as well as paucity of artificial intelligence methods applied in learning assessments. Research gaps are discussed and future studies on the use of IVE in education are suggested.

Keywords

Immersive virtual environments Learning assessment Education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Anna Carolina Muller Queiroz thanks CNPq, process n. 141876/2017-4. During this research, Romero Tori was sponsored by a grant from FAPESP (process 2016/26290-3) and received a scholarship from CNPq (process n.311991/2015-7).

References

  1. 1.
    Hsin, C.-T., Li, M.-C., Tsai, C.-C.: The influence of young children’s use of technology on their learning: a review. Educ. Technol. Soc. 17(4), 85–99 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lévy, P., Bononno, R.: Becoming Virtual: Reality in the Digital Age. Da Capo Press, Cambridge (1998). IncorporatedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thompson, P.: The digital natives as learners: technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Comput. Educ. 65, 12–33 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Armstrong, P.: Just How Big Is The Virtual Reality Market And Where Is It Going Next? Forbes, Jersey City (2017). https://www.forbes.com/sites/paularmstrongtech/2017/04/06/just-how-big-is-the-virtual-reality-market-and-where-is-it-going-next/Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burke, B., Cearley, D.W., Blau, B.: Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2018: Immersive Experience. Gartner, Stamford (2018). https://www.gartner.com/en/documents/3867163Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, A.V., Jones, R., Raghavan, A., Saif, I.: Digital Reality: The Focus Shifts from Technology to Opportunity. Deloitte, New York (2017). https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/focus/tech-trends/2018/immersive-technologies-digital-reality.htmlGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rosedale, P.: Virtual reality: the next disruptor: a new kind of worldwide communication. IEEE Consum. Electron. Mag. 6(1), 48–50 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2614416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Biocca, F., Delaney, B.: Immersive virtual reality technology. Commun. Age Virtual Real 15, 57–124 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dede, C.: Technological supports for acquiring 21st century skills. Int. Encycl. Educ. 3, 158–166 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sutherland, I.E.: A head-mounted three dimensional display. In: Proceedings of the December 9–11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I, pp. 757–764. ACM (1968).  https://doi.org/10.1145/1476589.1476686
  11. 11.
    Bailey, J.O., Bailenson, J.N.: Immersive virtual reality and the developing child. In: Brooks, P., Blumberg, F. (eds.) Cognitive Development in Digital Contexts, pp. 181–200. Elsevier, San Diego (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dalgarno, B., Lee, M.J.W.: What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 41(1), 10–32 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dawley, L., Dede, C.: Situated learning in virtual worlds and immersive simulations. In: Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Elen, J., Bishop, M.J. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 723–734. Springer, New York (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dede, C.J., Jacobson, J., Richards, J.: Introduction: virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. In: Liu, D., Dede, C., Huang, R., Richards, J. (eds.) Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education. SCI, pp. 1–16. Springer, Singapore (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5490-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fowler, C.: Virtual reality and learning: where is the pedagogy? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(2), 412–422 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Salzman, M.C., Dede, C., Loftin, R.B., Chen, J.: A model for understanding how virtual reality aids complex conceptual learning. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 8(3), 293–316 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wickens, C.D.: Virtual reality and education. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 842–847 (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Youngblut, C.: Educational uses of virtual reality technology (No. IDA-D-2128). Institute for Defense Analyses Alexandria VA (1998). https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a339438.pdf
  19. 19.
    Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A.C., Lundblad, N., Jin, M.: The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. J. Learn. Sci. 17(1), 102–141 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dede, C.: Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science (80-.) 323(5910), 66–69 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salzman, M.C., Loftin, R.B., Dede, C., McGlynn, D.: ScienceSpace: lessons for designing immersive virtual realities. In: Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 89–90 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jia, D., Bhatti, A., Nahavandi, S.: The impact of self-efficacy and perceived system efficacy on effectiveness of virtual training systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 33(1), 16–35 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scornavacca, E., Barnes, S.J., Huff, S.L.: Mobile business research published in 2000-2004: emergence, current status, and future opportunities. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17(1), 28 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Freina, L., Ott, M.: A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: state of the art and perspectives. In: The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, vol. 1, p. 133 (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Queiroz, A.C.M., et al.: Virtual reality in marketing: technological and psychological immersion (2018)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anderson, L.W., et al.: A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, abridged edn. Longman, White Plains (2001)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Queiroz, A.C.M., Tori, R., Nascimento, A.M.: Realidade virtual na educação: panorama das pesquisas no Brasil. In: Anais do XXVIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE 2017), pp. 203–212 (2017)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Queiroz, A.C.M., Tori, R., Moreira, N.A., da Silva Leme, M.I.: Using HMD-based immersive virtual environments in primary/K-12 education. Commun. Comput. Inf. Syst. 840(accepted paper), 1–14 (2018)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Queiroz, A.C.M., Kamarainen, A.M., Preston, N.D., da Silva Leme, M.I.: Immersive virtual environments and climate change engagement. In: Immersive Learning Research Network Proceedings, p. accepted paper (2018)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Das, R.C.: Handbook of Research on Global Indicators of Economic and Political Convergence. IGI Global, Hershey (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walsham, G., Sahay, S.: Research on information systems in developing countries: current landscape and future prospects. Inf. Technol. Dev. 12(1), 7–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marton, F., Säaljö, R.: On qualitative differences in learning—ii outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 46(2), 115–127 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., Jahren, C.T.: A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 49(3), 398–411 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Passig, D., Tzuriel, D., Eshel-Kedmi, G.: Improving children’s cognitive modifiability by dynamic assessment in 3D immersive virtual reality environments. Comput. Educ. 95, 296–308 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tamaddon, K., Stiefs, D.: Embodied experiment of levitation in microgravity in a simulated virtual reality environment for science learning. In: 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality Workshop on K-12 Embodied Learning through Virtual & Augmented Reality (KELVAR), pp. 1–5 (2017)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gelsomini, M.: An Affordable virtual reality learning framework for children with neuro-developmental disorder. In: Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 343–344 (2016)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Spector, J.M., et al.: Technology enhanced formative assessment for 21st century learning. Educ. Technol. Soc. 19(3), 58–71 (2016)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cope, B., Kalantzis, M.: Big data comes to school: implications for learning, assessment, and research. AERA Open 2(2), 2332858416641907 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Libâneo, J.C., Alves, N.: Temas de Pedagogia: Diálogos entre didática e currículo. Cortez Editora, Sao Paulo (2017)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kamarainen, A.M., Thompson, M., Metcalf, S.J., Grotzer, T.A., Tutwiler, M.S., Dede, C.: Prompting connections between content and context: blending immersive virtual environments and augmented reality for environmental science learning. Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci. 840, 36–54 (2018)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ketelhut, D.J., Nelson, B.C., Schifter, C.C., Kim, Y.: Using immersive virtual environments to assess science content understanding: the impact of context. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, CELDA 2010, pp. 227–230 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Carolina Muller Queiroz
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Alexandre Moreira Nascimento
    • 1
    • 3
  • Romero Tori
    • 1
  • Maria Isabel da Silva Leme
    • 1
  1. 1.Universidade de São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Stanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Lawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations