Advertisement

Contemplating a Repronational Portrait

  • Sandra P. González-Santos
Chapter

Abstract

In the final chapter, Contemplating a Repronational Portrait, I take a step back and look at the overall picture the book has offered, to point out the most relevant details of each chapter as well as the questions each one has left unanswered. I close this chapter and the book, with a reflection on how, at the clinic, practitioners are carefully creating a future generation one sperm and egg at a time, giving hope to people in desperation, while outside the clinic, in parliament chambers, stock exchange venues, streets, and religious sanctuaries, humanity is trying its best to disassemble hope.

References

  1. Almeling, R. (2011). Sex cells: The medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Arey, W. (2018, December 31). Web roundup: CRISPR babies and bioethics. Somatosphere. Retrieved January 12, 2019, from http://somatosphere.net/2018/12/web-roundup-crispr-babies-and-bioethics.html.
  3. Cofepris (Comisión Federal para la Prevención del Riesgo Sanitario). (2019). Listado de establecimientos Autorizados para reproducción Asistida. Accessed 22 July 2019. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/439319/SEASS_RA.pdf.
  4. Franklin, S. (2013). Biological relatives: IVF, stem cells, and the future of kinship. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gray, M. (2018, March 28). More than 4,000 eggs and embryos lost in Cleveland fertility clinic tank failure. Retrieved February 15, 2019, from CNN website: https://edition.cnn.com/2018/03/27/health/cleveland-fertility-clinic-eggs-embryos-lost/index.html.
  6. González Santos, S. P., Stephens, N., & Dimond, R. (2018). Narrating the first “three-parent baby”: The initial press reactions from the United Kingdom, the United States, and Mexico. Science Communication, 40(4), 419–441.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018772312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Olavarría Patiño, M. E. (2018). La gestante sustituta en México y la noción de trabajo reproductivo. Revista Interdisciplinaria de Estudios de Género de El Colegio de México, 4, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schurr, C. (2017). From biopolitics to bioeconomies: The art of (re-)producing white futures in Mexico’s surrogacy market. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(2), 241–262.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775816638851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Vázquez-Benítez, E. (Ed.). (1999). Medicina Reproductiva en México (Primera). México, D.F., Mexico: Manual Moderno JGH Editores S.A. de C.v.Google Scholar
  10. Vázquez-Benítez, E. (Ed.). (2003). Medicina Reproductiva (2o). México, D.F., México: Editorial Manual Moderno, AMMR.Google Scholar
  11. Walmsley, H., & Schurr, C. (2014). Reproductive tourism booms on Mexico’s Mayan Riviera. International Medical Travel Journal, 3.Google Scholar
  12. Wentzell, E. A. (2013). Maturing masculinities: Aging, chronic illness, and Viagra in Mexico. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang, J., Liu, H., Luo, S., Chavez-Badiola, A., Liu, Z., Yang, M., … Huang, T. (2016). First live birth using human oocytes reconstituted by spindle nuclear transfer for mitochondrial DNA mutation causing Leigh syndrome. Fertility and Sterility, 106(3), e375–e376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra P. González-Santos
    • 1
  1. 1.Facultad de BioéticaUniversidad AnáhuacMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations