Advertisement

Leveraging Technology for Shared Services Transformation

  • M. V. N. Naga Lakshmi
  • Y. V. N. Sai Sricharan
  • T. Vijayakumar
Chapter

Abstract

The study aims to gauge the influence of the increasing role of technology on Shared Services (SS) operations and efficiency. Based on information gathered by means of a questionnaire-based survey from over 100 Shared Service practitioners representing over 60 Shared Service Organizations (SSOs) across 14 industry segments in select cities of south India, where most Shared Service Centers (SSCs) are located, the findings of the survey reinforced that technology is largely considered a game changer for Shared Services, fundamentally changing the way SSCs operate. SSCs are harnessing technologies of Intelligent Process Automation such as Digital Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation, Machine Learning, and Cognitive and Artificial Intelligence in not just decreasing the effort required for repetitive, labor-intensive tasks but empowering SSCs to engage efficiently and accomplish higher-value objectives while they continue to stay competitive and meet changing customer needs effectively.

References

  1. Barrett, R. (2006). IT shared services: Managing and aligning costs for better performance. Business Performance Management, 4, 23–27.Google Scholar
  2. Bergeron, B. (2003). Essentials of knowledge management (Vol. 28). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, C. M. (2006). The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review, 93(12), 44–53.Google Scholar
  5. Drejer, A. (2002). Strategic management and core competencies: Theory and application. Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  6. Dressler, S. (2007). Shared services, business process outsourcing and offshoring. Die moderne Ausgestaltung des Back Office-Wege zu Kostensenkung und mehr Effizienz im Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar
  7. Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  8. Helmut, W. M. (2014). Four-phase-model for the implementation of shared services. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
  9. IMA. (2011). Implementing shared services centers. Institute of Management Accountants.Google Scholar
  10. Janssen, M., & Joha, A. (2006). Motives for establishing shared service centers in public administrations. International Journal of Information Management, 26(2), 102–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janssen, M., & Joha, A. (2007). Understanding IT governance for the operation of shared services in public service network. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations, 4(1), 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy: Text & cases. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  13. Keul, A. G., Bachleitner, R., & Kagelmann, H. J. (2000). Gesund durch Erleben. Aktuelle Trends der Tourismusgesellschaft. Profil, München Google Scholar.Google Scholar
  14. Mullins, L. J. (2007). Management and organisational behaviour. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  15. Niehaves, B., & Krause, A. (2010). Shared service strategies in local government – A multiple case study exploration. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(3), 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pérez, M. N. (2008). Service Center Organisation – Neue Formen der Steuerung von in-ternen Dienstleistungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Shared Services, 1st Editi-on, Gabler – GWV Fachverlage GmbH.Google Scholar
  17. Roos, G., & Roos, J. (1997). Measuring your company’s intellectual performance. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 413–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shared Services Forum. (2018). Global business services conclave, Bangalore.Google Scholar
  19. Tchamyou, V. S. (2017). The role of knowledge economy in African business. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 8(4), 1189–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tolboom, R. C., Draaisma, W. A., & Broeders, I. A. (2016). Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: A cohort study. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 10(1), 33–39.Google Scholar
  21. Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 83–104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. V. N. Naga Lakshmi
    • 1
  • Y. V. N. Sai Sricharan
    • 2
  • T. Vijayakumar
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management, SRM Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Verizon Data Services India LimitedHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations