Advertisement

Conclusions: Engaging with the Ethico-Political

  • Moran M. MandelbaumEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter summarises this book’s main arguments, namely the rise of the fantasy of nation/state congruency and the ideal of homogeneous societies, however defined and practiced, as constitutive of the ‘modern international’. Drawing on Rancière, this chapter engages with the ethico-political, thus exposing the exclusionary and violent dimensions of ‘policy’ and ‘politics’ that arise from our regime of congruency. This means that by exposing ethico-political implications one could also take the political as an ethical space, precisely because it is, as Arendt argued, a ‘gap between past and future’, a space in which the present can be changed. This chapter concludes with three main ethico-political implications and advocate rethinking our dependence on the ideal of societal homogeneity.

References

  1. Abizadeh, Arash. 2002. Does Liberal Democracy Presuppose a Cultural Nation? Four Arguments. American Political Science Review 96 (3): 495–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2004. Liberal Nationalist Versus Postnational Social Integration: On the Nation’s Ethno-Cultural Particularity and ‘Concreteness’. Nations and Nationalism 10 (3): 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abrahamsen, Rita. 2005. Blair’s Africa: The Politics of Securitization and Fear. Alternatives 30 (1): 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. ‘What Is a People’, in Means Without Ends: Notes on Politics. Trans. Cesare Casarino and Vincenzo Binetti. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  5. Agathangelou, Anna M., M. Daniel Bassichis, and Tamara L. Spira. 2008. Intimate Investments: Homonormativity, Global Lockdown, and Seductions of Empire. Radical History Review 100: 120–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agnew, John A. 1994. The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy 1 (1): 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ali, Nadia, and Ben Whitham. 2018. The Unbearable Anxiety of Being: Ideological Fantasies of British Muslims Beyond the Politics of Security. Security Dialogue 49 (5): 400–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Andersson, Ruben. 2016. Here Be Dragons: Mapping an Ethnography of Global Danger. Current Anthropology 57 (6): 707–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Arendt, Hannah. 1961. Between Past and Present. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
  10. Arfi, Badredine. 2010. Fantasy in the Discourse of ‘Social Theory of International Politics’. Cooperation and Conflict 45 (4): 428–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ayoob, Mohammed. 1995. The Security Predicament: State Making, Regional Conflict and the International System. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Bartelson, Jens. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. ———. 2001. The Critique of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bigo, Didier, and Elspeth Guild, eds. 2017. Controlling Frontiers: Free Movement Into and Within Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Calhoun, Craig. 2008. Cosmopolitanism and Nationalism. Nations and Nationalism 14 (3): 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Call, Charles T. 2008. The Fallacy of the ‘Failed State’. Third World Quarterly 29 (8): 1491–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell, David. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Campbell, David, and Michael J. Shapiro. 1999. Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Canovan, Margaret. 2016. Sleeping Dogs, Prowling Cats and Soaring Doves: Three Paradoxes in the Political Theory of Nationhood. Political Studies 49 (2): 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chandler, David. 2007. The Security–Development Nexus and the Rise of ‘Anti-Foreign Policy’. Journal of International Relations and Development 10 (4): 362–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conversi, Daniele. 2012. Modernism and Nationalism. Journal of Political Ideologies 17 (1): 13–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Croft, Stuart. 2012. Securitizing Islam: Identity and the Search for Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Letter to a Japanese Friend. In Derrida and Différance, ed. David Wood and Robert Bernasconi, 1–5. Chicago, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dillon, Michael, and Andrew Neal, eds. 2008. Foucault on Politics, Security and War. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Dillon, Michael, and Julian Reid. 2016. Global Liberal Governance: Biopolitics, Security and War. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30 (1): 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dillon, Michael, and Luis Lobo-Guerrero. 2009. The Biopolitical Imaginary of Species-Being. Theory, Culture & Society 26 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doty, Roxanne L. 1996. Immigration and National Identity: Constructing the Nation. Review of International Studies 22 (3): 235–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ———. 2003. Anti-Immigrantism in Western Democracies: Statecraft, Desire and the Politics of Exclusion. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. ———. 2007. States of Exception on the Mexico–US Border: Security, “Decisions,” and Civilian Border Patrols. International Political Sociology 1 (2): 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Downes, Alexander B. 2001. The Holy Land Divided: Defending Partition as a Solution to Ethnic Wars. Security Studies 10 (4): 58–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars: The Merging of Development and Security. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 2003. Social Reconstruction and the Radicalisation of Development: Aid as a Relation of Global Liberal Governance. In State Failure, Collapse and Reconstruction, ed. Jennifer Milliken, 291–312. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Eberle, Jakub. 2017. Narrative, Desire, Ontological Security, Transgression: Fantasy as a Factor in International Politics. Journal of International Relations and Development 22: 243–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Edkins, Jenny. 2000. Whose Hunger?: Concepts of Famine, Practices of Aid. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  35. Evans, Brad. 2010. Foucault’s Legacy: Security, War and Violence in the 21st Century. Security Dialogue 41 (4): 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Evera, Stephen. 1994. Hypotheses on Nationalism and War. International Security 18 (4): 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Foreign Policy. 2016. The Fragile States Index. https://foreignpolicy.com/fragile-states-index-2016-brexit-syria-refugee-europe-anti-migrant-boko-haram/. Accessed 25 Mar 2019.
  38. Gellner, Ernest. 2006 [1983]. Nations and Nationalism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Geuss, Raymond. 2002. Genealogy as Critique. European Journal of Philosophy 10 (2): 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Goldstone, Jack A., et al. 2000. State Failure Task Force Report: Phase III Findings. Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/stm103%20articles/StateFailureReport.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2019.
  41. Haritaworn, Jin, et al. 2013. Murderous Inclusions. International Feminist Journal of Politics 15 (4): 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Howell, Alison, and Melanie Richter-Montpetit. 2018. Racism in Foucauldian Security Studies: Biopolitics, Liberal War, and the Whitewashing of Colonial and Racial Violence. International Political Sociology 13 (1): 2–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huysmans, Jef. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Inayatullah, Naeem. 1996. Beyond the Sovereignty Dilemma: Quasi-States as Social Construct. In State Sovereignty as Social Construct, ed. Thomas J. Biersteker and Cynthia Weber, 50–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kapoor, Ilan. 2008. The Postcolonial Politics of Development. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 2014. Psychoanalysis and Development: Contributions, Examples, Limits. Third World Quarterly 35 (7): 1120–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kaufmann, Chaim D. 1998. When All Else Fails: Ethnic Population Transfers and Partitions in the Twentieth Century. International Security 23 (2): 120–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kendall, Gavin, and Gary Wickham. 1999. Using Foucault’s Methods. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Knodt, Eva M. 1995. Forward. In Social Systems, ed. Niklas Luhmann, ix–xxxvi. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Kuzio, Taras. 2002. The Myth of the Civic State: A Critical Survey of Hans Kohn’s Framework for Understanding Nationalism. Ethnic and Racial Studies 25 (1): 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kymlicka, Will. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lacan, Jacques. 1998 [1973]. Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  53. Lisle, Debbie. 2013. Frontline Leisure: Securitizing Tourism in the War on Terror. Security Dialogue 44 (2): 127–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Löwenheim, Oded. 2007. The Responsibility to Responsibilize: Foreign Offices and the Issuing of Travel Warnings. International Political Sociology 1 (3): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. ———. 2008. Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’. Third World Quarterly 29 (2): 255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Löwenheim, Oded, and Orit Gazit. 2009. Power and Examination: A Critique of Citizenship Tests. Security Dialogue 40 (2): 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Luhmann, Niklas. 2003. The Cognitive Program of Constructivism and a Reality that Remains Unknown. In Philosophies of Social Science: The Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Gerard Delanty and Piet Strydom, 436–441. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Mearsheimer, John J., and Robert A. Pape. 1993. The Answer – A Partition Plan for Bosnia. New Republic (14): 22–28.Google Scholar
  59. Miller, Benjamin. 2007. States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods. European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morgensen, Scott L. 2010. Settler Homonationalism: Theorizing Settler Colonialism Within Queer Modernities. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 16 (1–2): 105–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Nimni, Ephraim. 2007. National–Cultural Autonomy as an Alternative to Minority Territorial Nationalism. Ethnopolitics 6 (3): 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Parker, Noel, and Nick Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies. Geopolitics 14 (3): 582–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parsons, Nigel, and Mark B. Salter. 2008. Israeli Biopolitics: Closure, Territorialisation and Governmentality in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. Geopolitics 13 (4): 701–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Puar, Jasbir K. 2017a. The Right to Maim: Debility, Capacity, Disability. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. ———. 2017b. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Rancière, Jacques. 1992. Politics, Identification, and Subjectivization. October 61: 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Richmond, Oliver P. 2009. A Post-Liberal Peace: Eirenism and the Everyday. Review of International Studies 35 (3): 557–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rotberg, Robert I., ed. 2003. State Failure and State Weakness in a Time of Terror. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  70. Roth, Michael S. 1981. Foucault’s ‘History of the Present’. History and Theory 20 (1): 32–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Squire, Vicky. 2016. The Exclusionary Politics of Asylum. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  72. Stavrakakis, Yannis. 1999. Lacan and the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. ———. 2007. Lacanian Left. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Nikos Chrysoloras. 2006. (I Can’t Get No) Enjoyment: Lacanian Theory and the Analysis of Nationalism. Psychoanalysis, Culture & Society 11 (2): 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Stephens, Angharad C. 2013. The Persistence of Nationalism: From Imagined Communities to Urban Encounters. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Tilly, Charles. 1985. War Making and State Making as Organized Crime. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. Peter B. Evans et al., 169–191. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Verhaeghe, Paul. 1999. Causation and Destitution of a Pre-ontological Non-entity: On the Lacanian Subject. In Key Concepts of Lacanian Psychoanalysis, ed. Danny Nobus, 164–189. New-York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  79. Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Weber, Cynthia. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Zevnik, Andreja. 2017. Postracial Society as Social Fantasy: Black Communities Trapped Between Racism and a Struggle for Political Recognition. Political Psychology 38 (4): 621–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  83. ———. 2008. The Plague of Fantasies. 3rd ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social, Political and Global StudiesKeele UniversityKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations