Advertisement

Fantasies of Nationalism: Between Nation/State Dialectic and Liberal Thought

  • Moran M. MandelbaumEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

After the fragmentation of the state as modality of unity in late eighteenth-century thought, the fantasy of congruency becomes endemic to modern thought and practices. To exemplify this, this chapter analyses two political discursive formations that emerge in nineteenth-century Europe that draw on and further develop the discursive space of the nation/state and its idealised congruency. The first discursive formation is Hegel’s (political) philosophy in which state and nation are in a constant dialectical relationship as part of the telos of world history. The second discursive formation stems from liberal and democratic thought, focusing on the writings of James Mill, John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, thus illustrating how congruency is assumed to be vital to liberal democracies and the idea of representative democracy.

References

  1. Abizadeh, Arash. 2004. Liberal Nationalist Versus Postnational Social Integration: On the Nation’s Ethno-Cultural Particularity and “Concreteness”. Nations and Nationalism 10 (3): 231–250.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, Benedict. 2006. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Arendt, Hannah. 1958 [1951]. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 2nd ed. Cleveland and New York: Meridian Books.Google Scholar
  4. Avineri, Shlomo. 1974. Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Avineri, Shlomo, and Avner de-Shalit, eds. 1992. Communitarianism and Individualism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, Ray Stannard. 1922. Woodrow Wilson and World Settlement. Harvard: Doubleday, Page & Co.Google Scholar
  7. Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. The Bildungsroman and Its Significance in the History of Realism. In Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, 10–59. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barkin Samuel, J., and Bruce Cronin. 1994. The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations. International Organization 48 (1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartelson, Jens. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2001. The Critique of the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basham, Victoria M. 2016. Gender, Race, Militarism and Remembrance: The Everyday Geopolitics of the Poppy. Gender, Place & Culture 23 (6): 883–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bell, Duncan S.A. 2003. Mythscapes: Memory, Mythology, and National Identity. The British Journal of Sociology 54 (1): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. On Hegel, Women, and Irony. In Feminist Interpretations of G. W. F. Hegel, ed. Patricia Jagentowicz Mills, 25–44. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bernasconi, Robert. 2000. With What Must the Philosophy of World History Begin? On the Racial Basis of Hegel’s Eurocentrism. Nineteenth Century Contexts 22 (2): 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhat, Girish. 2007. Recovering the Historical Rechtsstaat. Review of Central and East European Law 32 (1): 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Boesche, Roger. 1987. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Boswell, David, and Jessica Evans. 1999. Representing the Nation: A Reader. Histories, Heritage and Museums. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Brooks, Thom. 2007. Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of the Philosophy of Right. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brubaker, Rogers. 1992. Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 1999. The Manichean Myth: Rethinking the Distinction Between “Civic” and “Ethnic” Nationalism. In Nation and National Identity: The European Experience in Perspective, ed. Hanspeter Kriesl, Klaus Armingeon, Hannes Slegrist, and Andreas Wimmer, 55–71. Zürich: Rüegger Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Danoff, Brian. 2007. Asking of Freedom Something Other than Itself: Tocqueville, Putnam, and the Vocation of the Democratic Moralist. Politics & Policy 35 (2): 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forbes, Duncan. 1975. Introduction. In Lectures on the Philosophy of World History, ed. Hugh Barr Nisbet, vii–xxxv. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Foucault, Michel. 2004 [1975–1976]. Society Must Be Defended. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2008 [1978–1979]. The Birth of Biopolitics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. ———. 2009 [1977–1978]. Security, Territory, Population. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Gellner, Ernest. 2006 [1983]. Nations and Nationalism. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Glynos, Jason, and David Howarth. 2007. Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawkins, Mike. 1997. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought, 1860–1945: Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heath-Kelly, Charlotte. 2016. Death and Security: Memory and Mortality at the Bombsite. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. 1975. Lectures on the Philosophy of World History. Trans. Hugh Barr Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hegel, Friedrich W.G. 1991 [1820/1821]. Hegel: Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Trans. Hugh Barr Nisbet and Ed. Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hodge, Joanna. 2010. Queering Hegel: Three Incisions. In Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone? ed. Kimberly Hutchings and Tuija Pulkkinen, 39–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hutchings, Kimberly. 2000. The Question of Self-Determination and Its Implications for Normative International Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (1): 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hutchings, Kimberly, and Tuija Pulkkinen, eds. 2010. Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone? London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Jackson Preece, Jennifer. 1997. Minority Rights in Europe: From Westphalia to Helsinki. Review of International Studies 23 (1): 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jacobitti, Suzanne D. 1991. Individualism & Political Community: Arendt & Tocqueville on the Current Debate in Liberalism, Polity 23 (4): 585–604.Google Scholar
  39. Jahn, Beate. 2005. Barbarian Thoughts: Imperialism in the Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Review of International Studies 31 (3): 599–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kant, Immanuel. 1996 [1785]. Kant: The Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kedourie, Elie. 1993 [1961]. Nationalism. 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Kohn, Hans. 1944. The Idea of Nationalism: A Study in Its Origins and Background. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  43. Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  45. ———. 2001. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lloyd, Genevieve. 1984. The Man of Reason: “Male” and “Female” in Western Philosophy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Locke, John. 2003 [1689]. Two Treatises on Government. London: Everyman.Google Scholar
  48. Malabou, Catherine. 2000. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, Dialectic. Hypatia 15 (4): 196–220.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2005. The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality, and Dialectic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Maletz, Donald J. 2002. Tocqueville’s Tyranny of the Majority Reconsidered. The Journal of Politics 64 (3): 741–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mandelbaum, Maurice. 1974. History, Man, and Reason. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mayall, James. 1990. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mayerfeld, Jamie. 1998. The Myth of Benign Group Identity: A Critique of Liberal Nationalism. Polity 30 (4): 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meadwell, Hudson. 1999. Stateless Nations and the Emerging International Order. In International Order and the Future of World Politics, ed. T.V. Paul and John A. Hall, 262–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Mill, John S. 1946 [1861]. On Liberty and Considerations on Representative Government. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  56. Mill, James. 1992 [1820/1823]. Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Montesquieu, Baron de. 2011 [1748]. The Spirit of Laws. New York: Cosimo Classics.Google Scholar
  58. Mosse, George L. 1985. Toward the Final Solution: A History of European Racism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  59. Mueller, Gustav E. 1958. The Hegel Legend of “Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis”. Journal of the History of Ideas 19 (3): 411–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nancy, Jean-Luc. 2002. Hegel: The Restlessness of the Negative. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  61. Norkus, Zenonas. 2004. Max Weber on Nations and Nationalism: Political Economy Before Political Sociology. The Canadian Journal of Sociology 29 (3): 389–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Palonen, Kari. 2001. Was Max Weber a “Nationalist”? A Study in the Rhetoric of Conceptual Change. Max Weber Studies 1 (2): 196–214.Google Scholar
  63. Passavant, Paul. 2002. No Escape: Freedom of Speech and the Paradox of Rights. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  64. Pelczynski, Zbigniew Andrzej. 1984. The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Pippin, Robert B. 1989. Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Popper, Karl. 2011 [1945]. The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  68. ———. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  69. Renan, Ernest. 2010 [1882]. What Is a Nation? In On the Nation and the Jewish People, ed. Shlomo Sand. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  70. Rosting, Helmer. 1923. Protection of Minorities by the League of Nations. The American Journal of International Law 17 (4): 641–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1968 [1762]. The Social Contract. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  72. Shapiro, Michael J. 1998. The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality. Millennium 27 (3): 695–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. ———. 2000. Literary Geography and Sovereign Violence: Resisting Tocqueville’s Family Romance. Alternatives 25: 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. ———. 2012. Literary Geography and Sovereign Violence: Resisting Tocqueville’s Family Romance. In Michael J Shapiro: Discourse, Culture, Violence, ed. Terrell Carver and Samuel A. Chambers, 104–122. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Stewart, Iain. 2007. From “Rule of Law” to “Legal State”: A Time of Reincarnation? Macquarie Working Paper Series (Macquarie Law WP 2007–12). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  76. Stolleis, Michael. 2001. Public Law in Germany: 1800–1914. USA: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  77. Stone, Alison. 2010. Matter and Form: Hegel, Organicism, and the Difference Between Women and Men. In Hegel’s Philosophy and Feminist Thought: Beyond Antigone? ed. Kimberly Hutchings and Tuija Pulkkinen, 211–232. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sylvester, Christine. 2015. Art/Museums: International Relations Where We Least Expect It. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  79. Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. ———. 1996. Reconstructing the Landscape of Imagination. In National Rights, International Obligations, ed. S. Caney, D. George, and P. Jones. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  81. Taylor, Charles. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. ———. 1990. Modes of Civil Society. Public Culture 3 (1): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Throntveit, Trygve. 2011. The Fable of the Fourteen Points: Woodrow Wilson and National Self-Determination. Diplomatic History 35 (3): 445–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. de Tocqueville, Alexis. 1988 [1835]. Democracy in America. Trans. George Lawrence. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  85. Todorov, Tzvetan. 1990. Tocqueville’s Nationalism. History and Anthropology 4 (2): 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Tucker, Robert C. 1956. The Cunning of Reason in Hegel and Marx. The Review of Politics 18 (3): 269–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Urbinati, Nadia. 2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  88. Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Violence, Modernity, Silence: From Max Weber to International Relations. In The Political Subject of Violence, ed. David Campbell and Michael Dillon, 137–160. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Walsh, William H. 1971. Principle and Prejudice in Hegel’s Philosophy of History. In Hegel’s Political Philosophy, ed. Zbigniew A. Pelczynski, 181–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Walzer, Michael. 1990. The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. Political Theory 18 (1): 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. ———. 1992. The Civil Society Argument. In Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, ed. Chantal Mouffe, 89–107. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  92. Weber, Max. 1994 [1919]. The Profession and Vocation of Politics. In Weber: Political Writings, ed. Peter Lassman and Ronald Speirs, 309–369. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Whittington, Keith. 2001. Revisiting Tocqueville’s America. In Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective, ed. Bob Edwards, Michael W. Foley, and Mario Diani, 21–31. New-England: UPNE.Google Scholar
  94. Zetterbaum, Marvin. 1967. Tocqueville and the Problem of Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Žižek, Slavoj. 2012. Less than Nothing: Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social, Political and Global StudiesKeele UniversityKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations