Advertisement

Proportionality in Punishment

  • Youngjae LeeEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

When the US Supreme Court decided in Graham v. Florida that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits a sentence of life in prison without parole for a nonhomicide crime committed by a minor, it stated that “[t]he concept of proportionality is central to the Eighth Amendment” and that it is the “precept of justice that punishment for crime should be graduated and proportioned to [the] offense.” These statements make two claims—one legal and one philosophical. The philosophical claim is that justice requires proportionality in punishment, and the legal claim is that this principle of justice is central to the Eighth Amendment ban on cruel and unusual punishments. The aim of this chapter is to examine the concept of proportionality in punishment from multiple vantage points—practical, legal, and philosophical—and consider its enduring importance and persistent difficulties.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author thanks Larry Alexander, Vincent Chiao, Antje du Bois-Pedain, and Adam Kolber for very helpful comments.

References

  1. Alleyne v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013).Google Scholar
  2. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).Google Scholar
  3. Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357 (1978).Google Scholar
  4. Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970).Google Scholar
  5. Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48 (2010).Google Scholar
  6. Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957 (1991).Google Scholar
  7. Martinez v. Illinois, 572 U.S. 833 (2014).Google Scholar
  8. Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2015).Google Scholar
  9. Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012).Google Scholar
  10. Oregon v. Ice, 555 U.S. 160 (2009).Google Scholar
  11. Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 137 S. Ct. 855 (2017).Google Scholar
  12. State v. Berger, 134 P.3d 378 (Ariz. 2006).Google Scholar
  13. United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 (1998).Google Scholar
  14. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).Google Scholar
  15. United States v. Cruz-Rodríguez, 541 F.3d 19 (1st Cir. 2008).Google Scholar
  16. Alexander, Michelle. 2010. The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  17. Astor, Maggie. 2018. California voters remove Judge Aaron Persky, who gave a 6-month sentence for sexual assault. New York Times. June 6.Google Scholar
  18. Barrish, Cris, and Jessica M. Reyes. 2015. Ex-Headmaster sentenced to 50 years for child porn. USA Today, April 24.Google Scholar
  19. Bentham, Jeremy. 2007. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Mineola: Dover. (Orig. pub. 1789.)Google Scholar
  20. Berman, Mitchell N. 2002. The normative functions of coercion claims. Legal Theory 8: 45–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carlson, Amber Rose. 2017. Is there a “rational” punishment for my rapist? New York Times, October 23.Google Scholar
  22. Chiao, Vincent. 2017. Mass incarceration and the theory of punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy 11: 431–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Del Real, Jose A. 2018. Activists try to recall judge in Stanford sex attack case. Some say they’ve gone too far. New York Times. February 2.Google Scholar
  24. du Bois-Pedain, Antje. 2017. Punishment as an inclusionary practice: Sentencing in a liberal constitutional state. In Criminal law and the authority of the state, ed. Antje du Bois-Pedain, Mangnus Ulväng, and Petter Asp, 199–227. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Duff, R.A. 2001. Punishment, communication, and community. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Feinberg, Joel. 1970a. Justice and personal desert. In Doing and deserving: Essays in the theory of responsibility, 55–94. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 1970b. The expressive function of punishment. In Doing and deserving: Essays in the theory of responsibility, 95–118. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1974. Noncomparative justice. Philosophical Review 83: 297–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fletcher, George. 1978. Rethinking criminal law. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  30. Gardner, John. 2007. Crime: In proportion and in perspective. In Offences and defences: Selected essays in the philosophy of criminal law, 213–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goode, Erica. 2011. Life sentence for child pornography spurs debate over severity. New York Times, November 4.Google Scholar
  32. Greenhouse, Linda. 2007. Justices decline case on 200-year sentence for man who possessed child pornography. New York Times, February 27.Google Scholar
  33. Jareborg, Nils. 1998. Why bulk discounts in multiple offence sentencing? In Fundamentals of sentencing theory: Essays in honour of Andrew von Hirsch, ed. Andrew Ashworth and Martin Wasik, 129–140. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lacey, Nicola. 1988. State punishment: Political principles and community values. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, Youngjae. 2005. The constitutional right against excessive punishment. Virginia Law Review 91: 677–745.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2009. Recidivism as omission: A relational account. Texas Law Review 87: 571–622.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2018. Multiple offenders and the question of desert. In Sentencing multiple crimes, ed. Jesper Ryberg, Julian V. Roberts, and Jan W. de Keijser, 113–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mayson, Sandra. 2018. Dangerous defendants. Yale Law Journal 127: 490–568.Google Scholar
  39. Miller, David. 1999. Principles of social justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pfaff, John F. 2017. Locked in: The true causes of mass incarceration and how to achieve real reform. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Reitz, Kevin. 2010. The illusion of proportionality: Desert and repeat offenders. In Previous convictions at sentencing: Theoretical and applied perspectives, ed. Julian V. Roberts and Andreas von Hirsch, 137–159. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Ristroph, Alice. 1997. Desert, democracy, and sentencing reform. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 96: 1293–1352.Google Scholar
  44. Roberts, Julian V. 2008. Punishing persistent offenders: Exploring community and offender perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Roberts, Julian V., and Anthony N. Doob. 1990. News media influences on public views of sentencing. Law and Human Behavior 14: 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Simon, Stephanie. 1996. Three strikes advocates passionately defend law. Los Angeles Times, July 3.Google Scholar
  47. Stack, Liam. 2016a. Light sentence for brock turner in Stanford rape case draws outrage. New York Times, June 6.Google Scholar
  48. ———. 2016b. Judge Aaron Persky under fire for sentencing in Stanford rape case. New York Times, June 7.Google Scholar
  49. Strawson, Peter. 2003. Freedom and resentment. In Free will, ed. Gary Watson, 72–93. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Stuntz, William J. 1996. Substance, process, and the civil-criminal line. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 7: 1–41.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 2001. The pathological politics of criminal law. Michigan Law Review 100: 505–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sulzberger, A.G. 2010. Defiant judge takes on child pornography law. New York Times, May 22.Google Scholar
  53. Tadros, Victor. 2011. The ends of harm: The moral foundations of criminal law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. U.S. Sentencing Commission. 2018. U.S. sentencing guidelines manual. Section 4A, introductory cmt.Google Scholar
  55. Vogt, R.J. 2018. Pressure grows on Oregon to end non-unanimous verdicts. Law360, November 18.Google Scholar
  56. von Hirsch, Andrew. 1985. Past or future crimes: Deservedness and dangerousness in the sentencing of criminals. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  57. ———. 1993. Censure and sanctions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. von Hirsch, Andrew, and Andrew Ashworth. 2005. Proportionate sentencing: Exploring the principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, Bernard. 1973. Morality and the emotions. In Problems of the self: Philosophical papers 1956–1972, 207–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fordham University School of LawNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations