Advertisement

Is Soil Inorganic Carbon (CaCO3, SIC) Sequestration a Bane or a Hidden Treasure in Soil Ecosystem Services?

  • D. K. Pal
Chapter

Abstract

Various estimates of the world storage of SOC are available, but there is very little effort to estimate the carbon stored in inorganic form, primarily as CaCO3. The soils that store large quantities of carbonates play an important role in global carbon cycle. Calcareous soils of India occupy an area of 228.8 m ha and cover 69.4% of the total geographical area (TGA) and spread over 38 out of 60 agro-ecological subregions, and the SIC stock is around 33.94Pg in the first 0–1.5 m depth. The SIC stock is mainly due to pedogenic formation of CaCO3 (PC) in semi-arid tropical (SAT) soils, which reduces crop productivity. The SOC stock (in the first 0–0.3 m depth) is more than double (9.55Pg) than SIC (4.14Pg). This suggests that the shallow-rooted agricultural crops enhance OC concentration in the rooting zones by preventing the rapid formation of PC, which is an important factor in rainfed agriculture in SAT environments. Current productivity of farmers’ fields in the rainfed tropics is two- to fourfold lower than the achievable crop yields. The arid and semi-arid environments cover more than 50% of the total geographical area of India, and the soils under such areas are, by and large, used for rainfed agriculture. In dry climates the primary pedogenic process is the calcification, which deprives soils of Ca ions both in solution and on exchange complex. Due to the lack of adequate Ca ions, both physical and chemical properties of soils are modified and cause reduction in crop yield. However, in view of the present soil productivity of calcareous SAT soils as evidenced from their support in India’s growing self-sufficiency in food production and food stocks since independence, a critical review is warranted to establish whether SIC is a useless C reserve and has no role in soil ecosystem services during the cultural practices of agricultural crops, under forest and natural grassland cover. The presence of PC is common in major soil types of semi-arid tropical (SAT) in India (alluvial soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, IGP, red ferruginous soils and shrink-swell soils). The formation of PC in the arid climate enhances the pH and also the relative abundance of Na+ ions on soil exchange sites and in the solution; and the Na+ ions in turn cause dispersion of the fine clay particles. The dispersed fine clays translocate in major soil types of India as the formation of PC creates a Na+-enriched chemical environment conducive for the deflocculation of clay particles and their subsequent movement downward. Therefore, the formation of PC and the clay illuviation are two concurrent and contemporary pedogenetic events, resulting in an increase in relative proportion of sodium, causing increased sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP) and pH values with depth. These pedogenetic processes continue to represent a pedogenic threshold during the dry climates of the Holocene. Thus, the formation of PC is a basic natural degradation process, induced by tectonic-climate-linked events, which exhibits the regressive pedogenesis by capturing atmospheric CO2 and also immobilizes C in unavailable form in soils. This pedogenic process results in substantial retardation of the emission of CO2 from both cultivated and noncultivated SAT soils and also supports the recent world views on no positive role of anthropogenic CO2 increase in the global warming phenomenon.

Due to regressive pedogenesis, SAT soils show strikingly different soil properties as compared to normal soils, which pose a challenge to land resource managers on how to revive the required balance between exchangeable and water-soluble Ca2+ ions in the soil systems to make calcareous sodic soils resilient. Sodic soils in the north-western (NW) parts of the IGP show salt-efflorescence in the surface as an evidence of soil sodicity, and this soil characteristic is mappable using remote sensing techniques. However, such maps for non-zeolitic and non-gypsiferous Vertisols, which show poor saturated hydraulic conductivity (sHC) (<10 mm h−1) even at ESP >5 < 15 and have poor crop productivity, are not available because of the absence of salt-efflorescence in the soil surface. Also, such soils do not qualify as salt-affected soils according to the US Salinity Laboratory criteria. Therefore, the reclamation technology developed by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research-Central Soil Salinity Research Institute (ICAR-CSSRI), Karnal, remained inaccessible to this kind of poorly drained and agriculturally less productive soils. Vertisols, which are impoverished in organic carbon (OC) but are rich in CaCO3, show enough resilience under improved management (IM) system (without adding gypsum and FYM) of the International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT). The average grain yield of the IM system over 30 years was five times more than that in the traditional management (TM) system. Due to the improvements in physical, chemical and biological properties of soils after adaptation of the IM system, the poorly drained black soil (Sodic Haplusterts) now qualifies for well-drained soils (Typic Haplusterts). Continuous release of higher amount of Ca2+ ions during the dissolution of CaCO3 under the IM system, compared to slower rate of formation of CaCO3, provides enough soluble Ca2+ ions to replace unfavourable Na+ ions on the soil exchange sites. Higher exchangeable Ca/Mg ratio in soils under IM system improved the sHC for better storage and release of soil water during the dry spell between rains. Adequate supply of soil water helped in better crop productivity and higher OC sequestration. The improvement in Vertisols’ sustainability suggests that the IM system is capable of mitigating the adverse effect of climate change. This management protocol though slow as compared to the gypsum-aided one is however cost-effective and farmer-friendly. This technology is recommendable for a large-scale impact on agricultural productivity. It also creates an interesting area of soil research that is to realize the benefit of the presence of CaCO3 as a hidden treasure and further as an ecosystem engineer during the reclamation of sodic soils. Role of SIC as an ecosystem engineer is also evidenced during the reclamation processes of IGP sodic soils even after the addition of gypsum. Sodic soils (Natrustalfs) of NW part of the IGP, after their reclamation by gypsum, improve in terms of their morphological, physical and chemical properties so much that these soils are now reclassified as well-drained and OC-rich normal Alfisols (Haplustalfs). Such remarkable resilience could be possible even with the low amount of added gypsum, suggesting that the added gypsum does not enrich soil solution by the required amount of Ca2+ ions to replace Na ions on the soil exchange sites. The fulfilment of Ca saturation could be possible by the dissolution of PC during the growing of the rice crop under submerged conditions. It was observed that the rate of dissolution of PC was much higher than its rate of formation in the top 1 m soil depth. Resilience of sodic soils of NW parts of the IGP through the dissolution of PC was also realized under protection of nearly four decades long naturally occurring grassland system. The released Ca2+ ions by dissolving PC effected through the acidic root exudates caused a remarkable reduction in pH and ECe and enhanced more than double OC concentration in the surface horizons. In addition, growing of trees for 12 years reclaimed the IGP sodic soils and improved their biological activity, which also resulted in a decrease in CaCO3 content. These observations suggest that the improvement in soil properties was triggered first by biological activity followed by the release of Ca ions from PC. Even after becoming normal soils as Haplustalfs and Haplusterts, both IGP and Vertisols are still calcareous. In view of its slow rate of dissolution, it is quite likely that Ca-ions-enriched chemical environment would allow neither Haplustalfs nor Haplusterts to transform to any other soil order so long CaCO3 would continue to act as a soil modifier. Positive role of CaCO3 in both the reclamation and sequestration of OC in SAT soils may benefit the maintenance of soil health of the farmlands, if additional financial support is made available to stakeholders of the sodic soils. The unique ecosystem services of SIC thus show enough potential to cause an increase in the present SOC stock of Indian soils beyond 30 Pg. Role of SIC in enhancing OC in SAT soils assumes a great importance in the present carbon cycle in addition to coupled carbonate weathering representing an atmospheric CO2 sink.

Keywords

Soil inorganic carbon (SIC) SIC stock of Indian SAT soils Less productive Indian SAT soils Role of SIC as ecosystem engineers Resilience of sodic soils 

References

  1. Abrol IP, Fireman M (1977) Alkali and saline soils: identification and improvement for crop production, Bulletin No. 4. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, KarnalGoogle Scholar
  2. Balpande SS, Deshpande SB, Pal DK (1996) Factors and processes of soil degradation in Vertisols of the Purna valley, Maharashtra, India. Land Degrad Dev 7:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batjes H (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Velayutham M, Chandran P, Mandal C (2000) Total carbon stock in Indian soils: issues, priorities and management. In: land resource management for food and environmental security. Soil Conservation Society of India, New Delhi, pp 1–46Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Chandran P, Mandal C, Ray SK, Gupta RK, Gajbhiye KS (2004) Managing soil carbon stocks in the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India, rice-wheat consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, New Delhi, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  6. Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK, Mandal C, Tiwary P, Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2014) Processes determining the sequestration and maintenance of carbon in soils: a synthesis of research from tropical India. Soil Horiz Published July 9, 2014, pp 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sh14-01-0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breecker DO, Sharp ZD, McFadden LA (2009) Seasonal bias in the formation and stable isotopic composition of pedogenic carbonate in modern soils from Central New Mexico, USA. Geol Soc Am 121:630–640.  https://doi.org/10.1130/B26413.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brevik EC (2012) Soil and climate change: gas fluxes and soil processes. Soil Horiz.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sh12-04-0012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carmi I, Kronfeld J, Moinester M (2019) Sequestration of atmospheric carbon dioxide as inorganic carbon in the unsaturated zone under semi-arid forests. Catena 173:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dhir RP (1995) The genesis and distribution of arid zone calcretes. Geol Soc India Mem 32:191–209Google Scholar
  11. Florides GA, Christodoulides P (2009) Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences. Total Environ 35:390–401Google Scholar
  12. Gupta RK, Abrol IP (1990) Salt-affected soils: their reclamation and management for crop production. In: Stewart BA (ed) Advances in soil science, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, pp 223–288Google Scholar
  13. Hua LZ (2011) Is pedogenic carbonate an important atmospheric CO2 sink? Chin Sci Bull 56:1–3.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-4288-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jangra R, Gupta SR, Singh N (2015) Plant biomass, productivity, and carbon storage in ecologically restored grassland on a sodic soil in North-Western India. Indian J Sci 20:85–96Google Scholar
  15. Lal R, Kimble JM (2000a) Pedogenic carbonate and the global carbon cycle. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  16. Lal R, Kimble JM (2000b) Inorganic carbon and the global carbon cycle: research and development priorities. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 291–302Google Scholar
  17. Liu Z, Macpherson GL, Groves C, Martin JB, Yuan D, Zeng S (2018) Large and active CO2 uptake by coupled carbonate weathering. Earth-Sci Rev 182:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pal DK, Dasog GS, Vadivelu S, Ahuja RL, Bhattacharyya T (2000) Secondary calcium carbonate in soils of arid and semi-arid regions of India. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 149–185Google Scholar
  19. Pal DK, Srivastava P, Durge S, Bhattacharyya T (2003a) Role of micro topography in the formation of sodic soils in the semi-arid part of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Catena 51:3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pal DK, Srivastava P, Bhattacharyya T (2003b) Clay illuviation in calcareous soils of the semi-arid part of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, India. Geoderma 115:177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Srivastava P, Chandran P, Ray SK (2009a) Soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: their historical perspective and management. Curr Sci 9:1193–1201Google Scholar
  22. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK (2009b) Tectonics-climate-linked natural soil degradation and its impact in rainfed agriculture: Indian experience. In: Wani SP, Rockström J, Oweis T (eds) Rainfed agriculture: unlocking the potential. CABI International, Oxfordshire, pp 54–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK, Satyavathi PLA, Durge SL, Raja P, Maurya UK (2009c) Vertisols (cracking clay soils) in a climosequence of Peninsular India: evidence for Holocene climate changes. Quat Int 209:6–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2012a) Vertisols of tropical Indian environments: pedology and edaphology. Geoderma 189–190:28–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2012b) Role of calcium carbonate minerals in improving sustainability of degraded cracking clay soils (sodic Haplusterts) by improved management: an appraisal of results from the semi-arid zones of India. Clay Res 31:94–108Google Scholar
  26. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Wani SP (2012c) Formation and management of cracking clay soils (Vertisols) to enhance crop productivity: Indian experience. In: Lal R, Stewart BA (eds) World soil resources. Francis and Taylor, Boca Raton, pp 317–343Google Scholar
  27. Pal DK, Sarkar D, Bhattacharyya T, Datta SC, Chandran P, Ray SK (2013) Impact of climate change in soils of semi-arid tropics (SAT). In: Bhattacharyya et al (eds) Climate change and agriculture. Studium Press, New Delhi, pp 113–121Google Scholar
  28. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL, Srivastava P (2014) Red ferruginous soils of tropical Indian environments: a review of the pedogenic processes and its implications for edaphology. Catena 121:260–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2015) Carbon sequestration in Indian soils: present status and the potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol Sci (NASB) India 85:337–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0351-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Sahrawat KL, Wani SP (2016) Natural chemical degradation of soils in the Indian semi-arid tropics and remedial measures. Curr Sci 110:1675–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao DLN, Ghai SK (1985) Urease and dehydrogenase activity of alkali and reclaimed soils. Aust J Soil Res 23:661–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ritter DF (1986) Process geomorphology. Wm C, Brown, Dubuque Iowa, 603 ppGoogle Scholar
  33. Rockström J, Hatibu N, Oweis T, Wani SP (2007) Managing water in rainfed agriculture. In: Molden D (ed) Water for food, water for life: a comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture. Earthscan/IWMI, London/Colombo, pp 15–348Google Scholar
  34. Sahrawat KL (2003) Importance of inorganic carbon in sequestering carbon in soils of dry regions. Curr Sci 84:864–865Google Scholar
  35. Seatz LF, Peterson HB (1964) Acid, alkaline, saline and sodic soils. In: Bear FE (ed) Chemistry of soils. Oxford & IBH Publishing, Calcutta, pp 292–319Google Scholar
  36. Srivastava P (2001) Paleoclimatic implications of pedogenic carbonates in Holocene soils of the Gangetic Plains, India. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclim Palaeoecol 172:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Srivastava P, Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK (2002) Significance of the formation of calcium carbonate minerals in the pedogenesis and management of cracking clay soils (Vertisols) of India. Clays Clay Miner 50:111–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Srivastava P, Patel S, Singh N, Jamir T, Kumar N, Aruche M, Patel RC (2013) Early Oligocene paleosols of the Dagshai Formation, India: a record of the oldest tropical weathering in the Himalayan Foreland. Sediment Geol 294:142–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Srivastava P, Pal DK, Aruche KM, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2015) Soils of the Indo-Gangetic Plains: a pedogenic response to landscape stability, climatic variability and anthropogenic activity during the Holocene. Earth-Sci Rev 140:54–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.10.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wani SP, Pathak P, Jangawad LS, Eswaran H, Singh P (2003) Improved management of Vertisols in the semi-arid tropics for increased productivity and soil carbon sequestration. Soil Use Manag 19:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wani SP, Sahrawat KL, Sreedevi TK, Bhattacharyya T, Srinivas Rao C (2007) Carbon sequestration in the semi-arid tropics for improving livelihoods. Int J Environ Stud 64:719–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wieder M, Yaalon DH (1974) Effect of matrix composition on carbonate nodule crystallization. Geoderma 43:95–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Pal
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Soil Resource StudiesICAR-NBSS&LUPNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations