Advertisement

Organic Carbon Sequestration and Ecosystem Service of Indian Tropical Soils

  • D. K. Pal
Chapter

Abstract

To meet the great challenge of feeding the global population in the coming centuries by keeping soil health intact, global scientists are busy to find suitable ways to maintain soil organic carbon (SOC) in general and in tropical soils in particular. Both SOC and soil inorganic carbon (SIC) are the most important components of soil as they determine ecosystem and agroecosystem functions by influencing soil fertility, soil water, environment, microbial activity and other soil parameters. SOC also has a role in the global carbon cycle and in the mitigation of atmospheric levels of greenhouse gases (GHGs). SOC and SIC stock estimates of soils reported all over the world show their important roles for atmospheric CO2 sequestration. SOC stock (in the first 0–150 cm) of Indian soils is less (29.92 Pg) than that of SIC (33.98 Pg). Impoverishment in SOC in Indian soils is largely due to less accumulation of organic C (< 1%) in soils of the arid and semi-arid and dry subhumid climatic regions, which cover nearly 50 % of the total geographical area of India. But soils of humid tropical (HT) climates have >1% OC content. Factors responsible for organic carbon sequestration of Indian soils are identified to be (i) profuse vegetation under HT climate with adequate rainfall (>> 1000 mm) under cooler temperature for a period of a few months,(ii) presence of Ca-zeolites that ensure adequate soil moisture in both HT and semi-arid tropical (SAT) climate by preventing the total transformation of smectite to kaolinite, (iii) active inorganic part of soil as a substrate to build the SOC through clay-organic matter complex formation, and (iv) presence of smectites and vermiculites, which have the largest specific surface area and are capable of accumulating greater amounts of OC than the non-expanding minerals. Recent review on the impact of phyllosilicate mineralogy on SOC protection emphasizes that introducing a ‘phyllosilicate mineralogy’ parameter in SOC models appears premature. Alongside the phyllosilicates, clay fractions can also contain short range order minerals, metallic oxides and hydroxides and carbonates, which may have importance for SOC protection and their possible interaction with phyllosilicates. Major soil types of India contain a variety of clay minerals of expanding and non-expanding nature alongside interstratified or mixed layer ones. A revisit is necessary to highlight the nature and properties of crystalline expanding clay minerals and mixed clay minerals and also of associated non-crystalline ones that are likely to influence SOC sequestration in major soil orders. The ability of these types of minerals in SOC sequestration would enable soils for ecosystem services. Despite being a 0.7 nm mineral interstratified with hydroxy-interlayered smectite, HIS (kaolin), it shows a remarkable capacity to sequester more organic carbon (OC) than SAT Vertisols dominated by fairly well crystalline smectite. Research clearly points out the superior role of interstratified clay minerals such as kaolin than discrete smectite in OC sequestration. This unique example expands the basic knowledge on the role of kaolin in stabilization of SOC, which happens only under acidic pedochemical environment induced by profuse vegetation under HT climate. Therefore, both acidity and interstratified clay minerals appear to be more important factors of OC sequestration in HT soils. In addition, Ca-zeolite is an important factor in OC sequestration as it has high CEC and a large surface area and helped in forming kaolin by preventing complete transformation of smectite to kaolinite by maintaining relatively high base saturation level in acidic Vertisols, Mollisols and Alfisols but fails to enhance their clay CEC values beyond 50 cmol (p+) kg-1. The million years old Inceptisols, Alfisols, Mollisols and Ultisols of HT climate have considerable amount of SOC in the 0–30 cm depth that ranges from ~ 1% to 3.1%, which signifies a quasi-equilibrium value under natural forest. Long-term experiments (LTEs) in temperate humid region of UK indicated the SOC increase >7‰ year−1 and OC content in the 0–23 cm soil depth increased from ~1% to 2.14%, which is comparable to OC content of the HT soils of India and thus suggests that for HT soils, there is no immediate need to achieve the ‘4 per 1000’ goal. However, it may be necessary in SAT soils in view of high possibility of CO2 release from these soils under hostile SAT climatic conditions. In the Indian sub-continent, Andisols, Mollisols, Alfisols and Inceptisols of the HT climate under forest cover have sequestered maximum amount of OC, which may suggest that introduction of forestry by removing land from agricultural land uses may lead to large accumulations of SOC. Observations however indicate that even under natural forest in Indian SAT climate, red ferruginous Alfisols and Vertic Inceptisols over a century’s time could sequester high OC concentration of 1.78% and 0.81% in the 0–30 cm soil depth, respectively. But the conversion of agricultural lands to forestry has severe limitations if food security goals of the Indian sub-continent are to be met. Cropping systems involving crop rotation, agroforestry and mulching are better strategies for farmers in the tropic. Few studies on SAT ferruginous Alfisols and Vertisols indicate that horticultural system shows a better quasi-equilibrium value of OC of 0.81% and 0.75% against 0.68% and 0.50% under agriculture system in the first 30 cm soil depth, respectively. Economic analysis on SOC sequestration reported that in majority of LTEs, the NPK plus FYM (10t ha−1) treatment showed higher SOC and also higher net return than that under NPK treatment, suggesting that application of FYM with NPK is a cost-effective, win-win technology for the Indian farmers. Paradoxically, the SOC content (0–30 cm depth) of an LTE of 28 years on SAT Vertisols using sorghum-wheat cropping system with recommended doses of NPK fertilizers plus FYM (10t ha−1) shows a value of 0.73% only. On the other hand, small but significant enhancement of OC content under horticultural system as compared to agricultural land uses is observed, which suggests that horticulture is a better option for SOC sequestration if forestry is not feasible in SAT red ferruginous Alfisols and Vertisols. It was noticed that the agricultural management practices advocated through the national agricultural research system (NARS) for the last several decades did not cause any decline in SOC in the major crop growing zones of the country under SAT climate. The increase in OC in agricultural soils (maximum up to ≤ 1% in 0–30 cm depth) observed in SAT areas through NARS interventions appears enough to provide ecosystem services in growing self-sufficiency in food production and food stock since independence. In fact, such interventions since post-Green Revolution period helped in increased OC sequestration in all soil types without leading to increased emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) to any alarming proportion. Among other ways to enhance the SOC stock of Indian SAT soils, conversion of soils with low productivity or that are fragile and prone to erosion, from agriculture to forest or grassland, may be a good strategy. Sodic soils are impoverished with OC but exhibit good potential to sequester OC when ameliorative management practices are implemented. Through the implementation of specific management practices for Typic Natrustalfs of IGP and Sodic Haplusterts of southern India, an increase in OC stock was observed for both soil types. Therefore, to include sodic soils as a potential option for C sequestration, additional financial support through incentives may be a viable option as soil C sequestration has proved to be the most cost-effective option as compared to geological sequestration. Further enhancement in SOC stock could be possible if the selected agricultural crops with more root volume are engineered by plant breeders. Greater release of carbonaceous acidic exudates from such crop roots would act as source of carbon. In addition, more soil acidity would also influence OC sequestration by breaking the crystalline clay structure to form short range order (SRO) minerals and hydroxy-interlayered clay minerals, which have high carbon sequestering potential.

Keywords

Soil organic carbon Factors of SOC sequestration SOC quasi-equilibrium in humid tropical soils Hydroxy-interlayered clay minerals and short range order minerals in SOC sequestration Options to enhance SOC in SAT soils 

References

  1. Abrol IP, Fireman M (1977) Alkali and saline soils: identification and improvement for crop production. Bulletin no. 4. Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Albanito F, Beringer T, Corstanje R et al (2016) Carbon implications of converting cropland to bioenergy crops or forest for climate mitigation: a global assessment. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 8:81–95.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banwart S, Black H, Cai Z et al (2013) Benefits of soil carbon. Special report on the outcomes of an international scientific committee on problems of the environment rapid assessment (SCOPE-RAP) workshop, Ispra (Varese), Italy during 18–22 Mar 2013Google Scholar
  4. Barnhisel RI, Bertsch PM (1989) Chlorites and hydroxy-interlayered vermiculites and smectite, In: Dixon JB, Weed SB (eds) Minerals in soil environments, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America Book Series 1, Wisconsin, USA, pp 729–788Google Scholar
  5. Barre P, Ugalde OF, Virto I, Velde B, Chenu C (2014) Impact of phyllosilicate mineralogy on organic carbon stabilization in soils: incomplete knowledge and existing prospects. Geoderma 235–236:382–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batjes H (1996) Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. Eur J Soil Sci 47:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Batjes NH (2011) Soil organic carbon stocks under native vegetation-revised estimates for use with the simple assessment option of the carbon benefits project system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142:365–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharjee JC, Roychaudhury C, Landey RJ, Pandey S (1982) Bioclimatic analysis of India. NBSSLUP Bulletin 7, National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning (ICAR), Nagpur, India, p 21+mapGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Deshpande SB (1993) Genesis and transformation of minerals in the formation of red (Alfisols) and black (Inceptisols and Vertisols) soils on Deccan basalt in the Western Ghats, India. J Soil Sci 44:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Velayutham M, Chandran P, Mandal C (2000) Total carbon stock in Indian soils: issues, priorities and management. Land resource management for food and environmental security. Soil Conservation Society of India, New Delhi, pp 1–46Google Scholar
  11. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Chandran P, Ray SK (2005) Land use, clay mineral type and organic carbon content in two Mollisols-Alfisols-Vertisols catenary sequences of tropical India. Clay Res 24:105–122Google Scholar
  12. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Lal S, Chandran P, Ray SK (2006) Formation and persistence of Mollisols on zeolitic Deccan basalt of humid tropical India. Geoderma 146:609–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK, Pal DK, Venugopalan MV, Mandal C, Wani SP (2007) Changes in levels of carbon in soils over years of two important food production zones of India. Curr Sci 93:1854–1863Google Scholar
  14. Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK, Chandran P, Ray SK, Mandal C, Telpande B (2008) Soil carbon storage capacity as a tool to prioritise areas for carbon sequestration. Curr Sci 95:482–494Google Scholar
  15. Bhattacharyya T, Sarkar D, Sehgal J, Velayutham M, Gajbhiye KS, Nagar AP, Nimkhedkar SS (2009) Soil taxonomic database of India and the states (1:250,000 scale). NBSS & LUP Publication 143, 266ppGoogle Scholar
  16. Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK, Mandal C, Tiwary P, Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2014) Processes determining the sequestration and maintenance of carbon in soils: a synthesis of research from tropical India. Soil Horiz, Published July 9, 2014, pp 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sh14-01-0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bhattacharyya T, Wani SP, Pal DK, Sahrawat KL (2017) Soil as source and sink for atmospheric CO2. In: Goel M, Sudhakar M (eds) Carbon utilization-applications for energy industry. Springer, Singapore, pp 61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caner L, Bourgeon G, Toutain F, Herbillon AJ (2000) Characteristics of non-allophanic Andisols derived from low-activity clay regoliths in the Nilgiri Hills (Southern India). Eur J Soil Sci 51:553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chabbi A, Lehmann J, Ciais P et al (2017) Aligning agriculture and climate policy. Nat Clim Chang 7:307–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chadwick D, Wei J, Yan’an T et al (2015) Improving manure nutrient management towards sustainable agricultural intensification in China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 209:34–46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chandran P, Ray SK, Bhattacharyya T, Srivastava P, Krishnan P, Pal DK (2005) Lateritic soils of Kerala, India: their mineralogy, genesis and taxonomy. Aust J Soil Res 43:839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chandran P, Ray SK, Durge SL, Raja P, Nimkar AM, Bhattacharyya T, Pal DK (2009) Scope of horticultural land-use system in enhancing carbon sequestration in ferruginous soils of the semi-arid tropics. Curr Sci 97:1039–1046Google Scholar
  23. Chatterjee D, Datta SC, Manjaiah KM (2013) Clay carbon pools and its relationship with short range order minerals: avenues for climate change? Curr Sci 105:1404–1410Google Scholar
  24. Chatterjee D, Datta SC, Manjaiah KM (2014) Transformation of short-range order minerals in maize (Zea mays L.) rhizosphere. Plant Soil Environ 60:241–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chu S (2009) Carbon capture and sequestration. Science 325:1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Datta SC, Takkar PN, Verma UK (2015) Assessing stability of humus in soils from continuous rice-wheat and maize-wheat cropping systems using kinetics of humus desorption. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 46:2888–2900.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2015.1104334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Datta A, Mandal B, Badole S, Chaitanya KA, Mazumdar SP, Padhan D, Basak N, Barman A, Kundu R, Narkhede WN (2018) Interrelationship of biomass yield, carbon input, aggregation, carbon pools and its sequestration in Vertisols under long-term sorghum-wheat cropping system in semi-arid tropics. Soil Tillage Res 184:164–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eswaran H, Kimble J, Cook T, Beinroth FH (1992) Soil diversity in the tropics: implications for agricultural development. In: Lal R, Sanchez PA (eds) Myths and science of soils of the tropics, SSSA Special Publication no. 29. SSSA, Inc and ACA, Inc, Madison, pp 1–16Google Scholar
  29. FAO (2009a) More people than ever are victim of hunger. Press release, FAO, Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  30. FAO (2009b) How to feed the world in 2050. High level consolation, 12–13 October, 2009Google Scholar
  31. Ghosh A, Bhattacharyya R, Meena MC, Dwivedi BS, Singh G, Agnihorti R, Sharma C (2018) Long-term fertility effects on soil organic sequestration in an Inceptisol. Soil Tillage Res 177:134–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hedstrand Y (2003) Effects of ammonium oxalate treatment on interlayer materials in 2:1 layer silicates from a Podzol. MSc thesis, Department of Forest Soils, SLU, Uppsala, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  33. ICAR-NAAS (Indian Council of Agricultural Research- National Academy of Agricultural Sciences) (2010) Degraded and waste lands of India-status and spatial distribution. ICAR-NAAS, Published by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, 56ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  35. Jacobson MZ (2009) Review of solutions to global warming, air pollution, and energy security. Energy Environ Sci 2:148–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jangra R, Gupta SR, Singh N (2015) Plant biomass, productivity, and carbon storage in ecologically restored grassland on a sodic soil in North-Western India. Indian J Sci 20:85–96Google Scholar
  37. Joshi SK, Bajpai RK, Kumar P, Tiwari A, Bachkaiya V, Manna MC, Sahu A, Bhattacharjya S, Rahman MM, Wanjari RH, Singh M, Coumar V, Patra AK, Chaudhari SK (2017) Soil organic carbon dynamics in a Chhattisgarh vertisol after use of a rice–wheat system for 16 years. Agron J 109:2556–2569.  https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2017.04.0230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kleber M, Eusterhues K, Keiluweit M, Mikutta C, Mikutta R, Nico PS (2015) Mineral-organic associations: formation, properties, and relevance in soil environments. Adv Agron 130:1–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kramer MG, Chadwick OA (2018) Climate-driven thresholds in reactive mineral retention of soil carbon at the global scale. Nat Clim Chang 8:1104.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0341-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lal S (2000) Characteristics, genesis and use potential of soils of the Western Ghats, Maharashtra. PhD thesis, Dr. P.D.V.K., Akola, Maharashtra, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  41. Lal R (2011) Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems. Food Policy 36:533–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lutfalle S, Barre P, Bernard S, Guillon CL, Alleon J, Chenu C (2018) Multidecadal persistence of organic matter in soils: investigations at the sub micrometer scale. Bio Geosci Discuss.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2018-343
  43. Malik A, Puissant J, Buckeridge KM, Goodall T et al (2018) Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes. Nat Commun 9:3591.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. McKinsey & Co (2009) Pathways to a low carbon economy: version 2 of the global greenhouse gas abatement cost curve. McKinsey & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Minasny B, Malone BP, McBratney AB et al (2017) Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma 292:59–86.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.Geoderma.2017.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Naitam R, Bhattacharyya T (2004) Quasi-equilibrium of organic carbon in shrink-swell soils of the sub-humid tropics in India under forest, horticulture, and agricultural systems. Aust J Soil Res 42:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nath AJ, Lal R, Sileshi GW, Das AK (2018) Managing India’s small holder farms for food security and achieving the “4 per thousand” target. Sci Total Environ 634:1024–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oades JM (1989) An introduction to organic matter in mineral soils. In: Dixon JB, Weed SB (eds) Minerals in soil environments, 2nd edn. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 89–159Google Scholar
  49. Pal DK (2017) A treatise of Indian and tropical soils. Springer, Cham, 180ppCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pal DK (2019) Simple methods to study pedology and edaphology of Indian tropical soils. Springer, Cham, 96ppGoogle Scholar
  51. Pal DK, Deshpande SB, Sehgal JL (1987) Development of soils in quaternary deposits of North India. Indian J Earth Sci 14:329–334Google Scholar
  52. Pal DK, Deshpande SB, Venugopal KR, Kalbande AR (1989) Formation of di- and trioctahedral smectite as an evidence for paleoclimatic changes in southern and central Peninsular India. Geoderma 45:175–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pal DK, Dasog GS, Vadivelu S, Ahuja RL, Bhattacharyya T (2000a) Secondary calcium carbonate in soils of arid and semi-arid regions of India. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Eswaran H, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and pedogenic carbonates. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 149–185Google Scholar
  54. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Deshpande SB, Sarma VAK, Velayutham M (2000b) Significance of minerals in soil environment of India, NBSS Review Series 1. NBSS&LUP, Nagpur, 68pGoogle Scholar
  55. Pal DK, Balpande SS, Srivastava P (2001) Polygenetic vertisols of the Purna Valley of Central India. Catena 43:231–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Ray, SK, Bhuse SR (2003) Developing a model on the formation and resilience of naturally degraded black soils of the peninsular India as a decision support system for better land use planning. NRDMS, DST Project Report, NBSSLUP (ICAR), Nagpur, p 144Google Scholar
  57. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Chandran P, Ray SK, Satyavathi PLA, Durge SL, Raja P, Maurya UK (2009) Vertisols (cracking clay soils) in a climosequence of Peninsular India: evidence for Holocene climate changes. Quatern Int 209:6–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Wani SP (2012a) Formation and management of cracking clay soils (Vertisols) to enhance crop productivity: Indian experience. In: Lal R, Stewart BA (eds) World soil resources, Francis and Taylor, pp 317–343Google Scholar
  59. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2012b) Vertisols of tropical Indian environments: pedology and edaphology. Geoderma 189-190:28–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T, Sinha R, Srivastava P, Dasgupta AS, Chandran P, Ray SK, Nimje A (2012c) Clay minerals record from late quaternary drill cores of the Ganga Plains and their implications for provenance and climate change in the Himalayan foreland. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 356–357:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2012d) Role of calcium carbonate minerals in improving sustainability of degraded cracking clay soils (sodic Haplusterts) by improved management: an appraisal of results from the semi-arid zones of India. Clay Res 31:94–108Google Scholar
  62. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL, Srivastava P (2014) Red ferruginous soils of tropical Indian environments: a review of the pedogenic processes and its implications for edaphology. Catena 121:260–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena2014.05.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pal DK, Wani SP, Sahrawat KL (2015) Carbon sequestration in Indian soils: present status and the potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci Biol Sci (NASB) India 85:337–358.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-014-0351-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Parfitt RL, Childs CW (1998) Examination of forms of Fe and Al: a review, and analysis of contrasting soils and dissolution and Mossbauer methods. Aust J Soil Res 26:121–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pathak H, Byjesh K, Chakrabarti B, Aggarwal PK (2011) Potential and cost of carbon sequestration in Indian agriculture: estimates from long-term field experiments. Field Crops Res 120:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Peech M, Alexander LT, Dean LA, Reed JF (1947) Methods of soil analysis and soil fertility investigations. US Department of Agriculture, circular no.752Google Scholar
  67. Poulton P, Johnston J, Macdonald A, White R, Powlson D (2018) Major limitations to achieving “4 per 1000” increases in soil organic carbon stock in temperate regions: evidence from long-term experiments at Rothamsted Research, UK. Glob Chang Biol 24:2563.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14066CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Powlson DS, Whitmore AP, Goulding WT (2011) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. Eur J Soil Sci 62:42–55.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rao DLN (2017) Microbial and biochemical origins of soil organic matter: insights from history and recent ecological and bio-molecular advances. In: Sanyal SK (ed) Souvenir of 82nd annual convention and national seminar of Indian Society of Soil Science, 11–14 November, Kolkata, pp 77–89Google Scholar
  70. Rasmussen C, Heckman K, Wieder WR, Keiluweit M et al (2018) Beyond clay: towards an improved set of variables for predicting soil organic matter content. Biogeochemistry. February 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0424-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ray SK, Chandran P, Durge S.L (2001) Soil taxonomic rationale: kaolinitic and mixed mineralogy classes of highly weathered ferruginous soils. Abstract, 66th Annual Convention and National Seminar on “Developments in soil science” of the Indian Society of Soil Science, Udaipur, Rajasthan, pp 243–244Google Scholar
  72. Rich CI (1960) Aluminum in interlayers of vermiculite. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 24:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rich CI (1968) Hydroxy-interlayering in expansible layer silicates. Clay Clay Miner 16:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sanchez PA (1976) Properties and management of soils in the tropics. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  75. Sharma RC, Bhargava GP (1981) Morphogenic changes in an alkali (sodic) soil pedon during amelioration through gypsum application. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 29:274–277Google Scholar
  76. Sharma KL, Reddy S, Chary GR et al (2018) Effect of surface residue management under minimum tillage on crop yield and soil quality indices after 6 years in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)-cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) system in rainfed Alfisols. Indian J Dryland Agric Res & Dev 33:64–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sidhu GS, Bhattacharyya T, Sarkar D, Chandran P, Pal DK et al (2014) Impact of management levels and land-use changes on soil properties in rice-wheat cropping system of the Indo-Gangetic Plains. Curr Sci 107:1487–1501Google Scholar
  78. Smith GD (1986) The Guy Smith interviews: rationale for concept in soil taxonomy. SMSS Technical Monograph, 11. SMSS, SCS, USDA, USAGoogle Scholar
  79. Smith P et al (2013) How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals? Glob Chang Biol 19:2285–2302.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Souza IF, Archanjo BS, Hurtarte LCC, Oliveros ME, Gouvea CP, Lidizio LR, Achete CA, Schaefer CER, Silva IR (2017) Al-/Fe- (hydr) oxides-organic carbon associations in Oxisols-from ecosystems to submicron scales. Catena 154:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Srinivasarao C, Venkateswarlu B, Lal R, Singh AK, Kundu S (2013) Sustainable management of soils of dryland ecosystems of India for enhancing agronomic productivity and sequestering carbon. Adv Agron 121:253–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swarup A, Manna MC, Singh GB (2000) Impact of land use and management practices on organic carbon dynamics in soils of India. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and tropical ecosystems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 261–281Google Scholar
  83. Tilman D, Fargione J, Wolff B, D’Antonio C, Dobson A, Howarth R, Schlesinger WH, Simberloff D, Swackhamer D (2001) Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292:281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Velayutham M, Pal DK, Bhattacharyya T (2000) Organic carbon stock in soils of India. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Stewart BA (eds) Global climate change and tropical ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 71–95Google Scholar
  85. Velmourougane K, Prasanna R, Singh S, Chawla G, Kumar A, Saxena AK (2017) Modulating rhizosphere colonization, plant growth, soil nutrient availability and plant defense enzyme activity through Trichoderma viride-Azobacter chroococuum biofilm inoculation in chickpea. Plant Soil 421:157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Vinnet JC, Hubert F, Terte E, Ferrange E, Robin V et al (2016) On the experimental dissolution and auto-aluminization process of K-vermiculite. Geochimica et Cosmochimia Acta 180:164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wani SP, Pathak P, Jangawad LS, Eswaran H, Singh P (2003) Improved management of Vertisols in the semi-arid tropics for increased productivity and soil carbon sequestration. Soil Use Manag 19:217–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Woomer PL, Martin A, Albrecht A, Resck DVS, Scharpenseel HW (1994) The importance and management of soil organic matter in the tropics. In: Woomer PL, Swift MJ (eds) The biological management of tropical soil fertility. A Wiley-Sayce Publication, Exeter, pp 47–80Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. K. Pal
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Soil Resource StudiesICAR-NBSS&LUPNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations