Stackelberg Model and Public-Private Partnerships in the Natural Resources Sector of Russia

  • Sergey LavlinskiiEmail author
  • Artem Panin
  • Aleksandr V. Plyasunov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11548)


A comparative analysis is conducted of the efficiency of different partnership models in the natural resources sector of Russia. The first one is a classic public-private partnership (PPP) model used in developed countries, whereby a private company builds an object of public property and transfers it to the government either immediately after the construction or after a certain period of operation of the object. The second model represents for the government a costly alternative of the former and is used in Russia in underdeveloped regions. This model assumes that the government supports the investor in infrastructure development and, in part, in the implementation of mandatory environmental protection measures and can also provide tax incentives. In practical terms, this work aims to look into possible ways of transforming the current Russian PPP model towards the classic forms of partnership. To conduct the comparative analysis of the PPP models, Stackelberg models are formulated and original iterative algorithms are developed for solving the corresponding bilevel Boolean programming problems based on probabilistic local search. The properties of the equilibrium solutions are studied using real data for the Transbaikal krai. Based on the modeling results, the different partnership models are compared to find out the conditions under which the private investor would choose to invest in publicly owned industrial infrastructure facilities in Russia.


Stackelberg game Bilevel mathematical programming problems Mineral resources development program Probabilistic local search algorithm 



This work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 16-18-00073).


  1. 1.
    Reznichenko, N.V.: Public-private partnership models. Bull. St. Petersburg Univ. Ser. 8 Manag. 4, 58–83 (2010). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Quiggin, J.: Risk, PPPs and the public sector comparator. Aust. Account. Rev. 14(33), 51–61 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grimsey, D., Levis, M.K.: Public private partnerships: the worldwide revolution in infrastructure provision and project finance. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennett, J., Iossa, E.: Delegation of contracting in the private provision of public services. Rev. Ind. Organ. 29(1), 75–92 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lavlinskii, S.M.: Public-private partnership in a natural resource region: ecological problems, models, and prospects. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 21(1), 71–79 (2010). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glazyrina, I.P., Kalgina, I.S., Lavlinskii, S.M.: Problems in the development of the mineral and raw material base of Russia’s far east and prospects for the modernization of the region’s economy in the framework of Russian-Chinese cooperation. Reg. Res. Russ. 3(4), 21–29 (2013). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glazyrina, I.P., Lavlinskii, S.M., Kalgina, I.S.: Public-private partnership in the mineral resources complex of Zabaikalskii krai: problems and prospects. Geogr. Nat. Resour. 35(4), 359–364 (2014). Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lavlinskii, S., Panin, A., Pliasunov, A.: A two-level planning model for public-private partnership. Autom. Remote Control. 11, 89–103 (2015). Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lavlinskii, S., Panin, A., Pliasunov, A.: Comparison of models of planning the public-private partnership. J. Appl. Ind. Math. 10(3), 1–17 (2016). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lavlinskii, S., Panin, A.A., Plyasunov, A.V.: Public-private partnership models with tax incentives: numerical analysis of solutions. In: Eremeev, A., Khachay, M., Kochetov, Y., Pardalos, P. (eds.) OPTA 2018. CCIS, vol. 871, pp. 220–234. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  11. 11.
    Glazyrina, I., Lavlinskii, S.: Transaction costs and problems in the development of the mineral and raw-material base of the resource region. J. New Econ. Assoc. New Econ. Assoc. 38(2), 121–143 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dempe, S.J.: Foundations of Bilevel Programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davydov, I., Kochetov, Yu., Plyasunov, A.: On the complexity of the (r\(\mid \)p)-centroid problem in the plane. TOP 22(2), 614–623 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plyasunov, A.V., Panin, A.A.: The pricing problem, Part I: exact and approximate algorithms. J. Appl. Ind. Math. 7(2), 1–14 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Plyasunov, A.V., Panin, A.A.: The pricing problem, Part II: computational complexity. J. Appl. Ind. Math. 7(3), 1–13 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kononov, A.V., Kochetov, Yu. A., Plyasunov, A.V.: Competitive facility location models. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 49(6), 994–1009 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sergey Lavlinskii
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Artem Panin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aleksandr V. Plyasunov
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Sobolev Institute of MathematicsNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia
  3. 3.Zabaikalsky State UniversityChitaRussia

Personalised recommendations