Advertisement

Introduction

  • Gábor BaranyaiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Water Governance - Concepts, Methods, and Practice book series (WGCMP)

Abstract

The various human-induced pressures of our era are leading to a massive degradation of the quality and quantity of freshwater resources worldwide. Therefore, water security in the broadest sense of the term will be one of the critical questions of development, peace and stability in the 21st century. Such changing hydrological conditions are further complicated by the geography of water: around 47% of the Earth’s surface waters lie in basins shared by at least two countries. Consequently, the bulk of world’s unfolding water crisis will have to be addressed and solved in an international context. This is particularly relevant in the case of the European Union that boasts the highest number and most complex shared river basins in the world. While the EU has developed one of the most extensive and sophisticated supranational water policy regime worldwide, its transboundary governance framework has certain structural deficiencies that may eventually give rise to significant cooperation gridlocks over shared rivers. This study provides a first critical analysis of the fitness of the EU to handle co-riparian relations at the age of the Anthropocene.

Keywords

Global water crisis International river basins European Union 

References

  1. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2009) Water resources across Europe—confronting water scarcity and drought. EEA Report No. 2/2009, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  2. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2012a) European waters—assessment of status and pressures. EEA Report No. 8/2012, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  3. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2012b) Water resources in Europe in the context of vulnerability. EEA Report No. 11/2012, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  4. EEA (European Environment Agency) (2012c) Climate change, impacts and vulnerability in Europe 2012—an indicator-based report. EEA Report No. 12/2012, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  5. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber H, Nykvist B, De Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. US National Intelligence Council (2012) Global trends 2030: alternative worlds. Central Intelligence Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Wolf A, Natharius J, Danielson J, Ward B, Pender J (1999) International river basins of the world. Int J Water Resour Dev 15(4):387–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Wolf, AT (2009) Hydropolitical vulnerability and resilience. In: UNEP (eds) Hydropolitical vulnerability and resilience along international waters. UNEP, Nairobi, EuropeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Water ScienceUniversity of Public ServiceBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations