Advertisement

Development and Usability Analysis of a Mixed Reality GPS Navigation Application for the Microsoft HoloLens

  • Renan Luigi Martins GuareseEmail author
  • Anderson MacielEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11542)

Abstract

Navigation in real environments is arguably one of the primary applications for the mixed reality (MR) interaction paradigm. We propose a wearable MR system based on off-the-shelf devices as an alternative to the widespread handheld-based GPS navigation paradigm. Our system uses virtual holograms placed on the terrain instead of the usual heads-up display approach where the augmentations follow the line of sight. In a user experiment, we assessed performance and usability. We monitored user attention through EEG while performing a navigation task using either the MR or the handheld interface. Results show that users deemed our solution to offer a higher visibility to both the oncoming traffic and the suggested route. EEG readings also exposed a significantly less demanding focus level for our prototype. An easiness to learn and use was also indicated for the MR system.

Keywords

Mixed and augmented reality Human-computer interaction GPS navigation 

References

  1. 1.
    Bagling, M.: Navigating to real life objects in indoor environments using an augmented reality headset. Master’s thesis, Umea University, Umea, Sweden (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beding, S.: The Christopher Columbus Encyclopedia. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dancu, A., Franjcic, Z., Fjeld, M.: Smart flashlight: map navigation using a bike-mounted projector. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2014, pp. 3627–3630 (2014)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Inman, J.: Navigation and Nautical Astronomy for the Use of British Seamen. C. and J. Rivington, London (1835)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin, A.Y., Kuehl, K., Schöning, J., Hecht, B.: Understanding “death by GPS”: a systematic study of catastrophic incidents associated with personal navigation technologies. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI 2017, pp. 1154–1166 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Medenica, Z., Kun, A.L., Paek, T., Palinko, O.: Augmented reality vs. street views: a driving simulator study comparing two emerging navigation aids. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI 2011, pp. 265–274 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rehman, U.: Augmented reality for indoor navigation and task guidance. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Robinson, J.: Likert scale. In: Michalos, A.C. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, pp. 3620–3621. Springer, Dordrecht (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1654CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of InformaticsFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations