Advertisement

The Shift of Symbolic Meaning of Joglo Houses for People in Brayut Tourism Village

  • Purwanto Hadi
  • Vincentia Reni Vitasurya
  • Eduardus Kevin Pandu
Conference paper

Abstract

Joglo house is a symbol of nobility in Javanese culture and in the traditional social structure as to whom leads the community. It has a pendopo as a formal public meeting area. The shape of pendopo is represented by a high and wide roof span which reflect spatial and symbolic meanings. Brayut village is a traditional rural area which supported peri-urban agriculture of Kasultanan Yogyakarta in the 1800 era. This village has been reorganized as a traditional village for the tourism industry since 1999. Three Joglo houses represent some of the unique attractions for Brayut tourism village. The oldest Joglo house was built by Demang of Brayut as a regional leader in the 1890s. The change in the present governmental system negated the Joglo house’s use and therefore it is no longer a symbol of leadership in the village. This study explores the shifting symbolic meanings of Joglo houses in Brayut village. It examines three Joglo houses as study cases. The methods of collecting data includes interviews with the owners and mappings of the transformation of spatial forms and functions. The results show that the shift in symbolic meaning occurred in two important zones of Joglo house, i.e.: the pendopo and ndalem. The symbol of the leader turns into the pride of the descendants. Ndalem is a symbol of the sacred within the house yet it has been modified for the tourists. The altered symbolic meaning has not physically distorted the building form and it still suggests obedience to the ancestor in its representation.

Keywords

Symbolic meaning Tourism Village Traditional architecture Javanese house 

References

  1. 1.
    Prie, M. M.: Pancaran Limasan – The Brilliance of Limasan. 1st ed. Red & White Publishing – Tembi Rumah Budaya, Yogyakarta (2016).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adiyanto, J.: Mencari DNA Arsitektur di Nusantara. in Seminar Arsitektur Nusantara IPLBI, May 2018 (2018).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wardani, L. K.: Interior Spatial Arrangement of the Javanese House. in Exploring Noble Values of Local Wisdom and Prime Javanese Culture to Strengthen the Nation Identity, pp. 644–652 (2011).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kartono, J. L.: Konsep Ruang Tradisional Jawa dalam Konteks Budaya. Dimens Inter. 3(2), 124–136 (2005).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dakung, S.: Arsitektur Tradisional Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, 2nd ed. CV. Piala Permai, Jakarta (1998).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ismunandar, R.: Joglo-Arsitektur Rumah Tradisional Jawa, 3rd ed. Dahara Prize, Semarang (1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raffles, T. S.: The History of Java, 4th ed. Narasi, Yogyakarta (2016).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kusno, A.: Guardian of memories: Gardu in urban Java. Indonesia (81), 95–149 (2006).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laurens, J.M.: Arsitektur dan perilaku manusia. Penerbit PT Grasindo, Jakarta (2004).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tashadi, Suwarno, P., Harjono, T., Harnoko, D., Moertjipto, and Prasetyo, B.: Kabupaten Sleman Dalam Perjalanan Sejarah, 1st ed. Humas Sekretariat Daerah Kabupaten Sleman, Yogyakarta (2002).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cuthbert, A.: Venacular Transfomations: Context, Isues, Debates. In: Suartika, G.A.M. (ed.) Vernacular Transformations. pp. 7–39. Pustaka Larasan and Udayana University’s Program, Denpasar (2013).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Broadbent, G., Bunt, R., Jencks, C.: Signs, symbols, and architecture. John Wiley & Sons, (1980).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lucia Asdra Rudwiarti, Anna Pudianti, Vincentia Reni Vitasurya, (2017) A Comparison Study of Tangible and Intangible Culture as Commercialisation Process of Tourism Village in Yogyakarta. E-Journal of Tourism:71Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Plevoets, B., Sowińska-Heim, J.: Community initiatives as a catalyst for regeneration of heritage sites: Vernacular transformation and its influence on the formal adaptive reuse practice. Cities 78, 1–18 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    V R Vitasurya, G Hardiman, S R Sari, (2018) Transformation of traditional houses in the development of sustainable rural tourism, case study of Brayut Tourism Village in Yogyakarta. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 106:012060CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Purwanto Hadi
    • 1
  • Vincentia Reni Vitasurya
    • 1
  • Eduardus Kevin Pandu
    • 1
  1. 1.Universitas Atma Jaya YogyakartaYogyakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations