Advertisement

Online Shopping Motives - An Empirical Investigation of Consumer Buying Behavior in Germany’s Main Online Retail Segments

  • Silvia ZahariaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11588)

Abstract

In the perpetual battle for increased revenues, online retailers need to understand what actions to take in order to turn non-buyers into buyers. This study researches the online shopping motives of German online shoppers and their online buying behavior in the main online retail segments: marketplaces, generalists, fashion, consumer electronics, beauty and toys. 19 German online retailers (representing approx. 70% of German online sales) were analyzed.

The research is based on extensive qualitative (focus groups) and quantitative research. The shopping motives construct was conceptualized and operationalized as a multidimensional construct with nine motivational categories. The data from the quantitative survey were analyzed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, and nine shopping motives within 16 total dimensions were established: recreational orientation (social & inspirational shopping), convenience orientation (search & possession convenience), striving for independence, risk aversion (privacy, product, delivery & retailer-related), price orientation (= smart shopping), assortment orientation (variety seeking & specialization), advice orientation (company owned & third party), sustainability orientation (= ecological) and quality orientation (= visual appeal).

The differences between the online shopping motives of buyers and non-buyers in each of the six online retailing segments were investigated as pair comparisons using the Mann-Whitney-U test. The result is that there are significant differences in the online shopping motives in all researched industries. Most differences exist in the beauty industry where 14 of the 16 dimensions of shopping motives differ significantly. The fewest differences are in the marketplaces segment. Only five of the 16 dimensions of shopping motives differ significantly here.

Keywords

Online shopping motives Recreational orientation (social & inspirational shopping) Convenience orientation (search & possession convenience) Striving for independence Risk aversion (privacy, product, delivery & retailer related) Price orientation (smart shopping) Assortment orientation (variety seeking & specialization) Advice orientation (company owned & third party) Sustainability orientation (ecologically) Quality orientation (visual appeal) 

References

  1. Atkins, K., Kim, Y.: Smart shopping: conceptualization and measurement. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 40(5), 360–375 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahtar, A., Muda, M.: The impact of user – generated content (UGC) on product reviews towards online purchasing – a conceptual framework. Proc. Econ. Financ. 37, 337–342 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bevh: bevh (2019). https://www.bevh.org/presse/pressemitteilungen.html. Accessed 28 Jan 2019
  4. Falode, B.O., et al.: Online and offline shopping motivation of apparel consumers in Ibadan Metropolis. Nigeria. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 8(1), 150 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ganesh, J., Reynolds, K., Luckett, M., Pomirleanu, N.: Online shopper motivations, and e-store attributes: an examination of online patronage behavior and shopper typologies. J. Retail. 86, 106–115 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirschman, E.C., Holbrook, M.B.: Hedonic consumption: emerging concepts, methods and propositions. J. Mark. 46(Summer), 92–101 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Homburg, C., Dobratz, A.: Iterative Modellselektion in der Kausalanalyse. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 43(3), 213–237 (1991). S. 233Google Scholar
  8. Hönle, J.: Online beraten und verkaufen, pp. 1–8. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Iconaru, C.: Perceived risk when buying online: evidence from a semi- structured interview. Econ. Ser. 22(2), 63–73 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. IFH: Branchenreport Onlinehandel, Jahrgang 2018, Köln (2018)Google Scholar
  11. Jiang, L.A., Yang, Z., Jun, M.: Measuring consumer perceptions of online shopping convenience. J. Serv. Manag. 24(2), 191–214 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joshi, Y., Rahman, Z.: Factors affecting green purchase behavior and future research directions. Int. Strat. Manag. Rev. 3, 128–143 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaufman-Scarborough, C., Lindquist, J.D.: E-shopping in a multiple channel environment. J. Consum. Mark. 19(4), 333–350 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kroeber-Riel, W., Gröppel-Klein, A.: Konsumentenverhalten, 10th edn. Vahlen, München (2013)Google Scholar
  15. Martínez-López, F., Pla-Gracía, C., Gázquez-Abad, J., Rodríguez-Ardura, I.: Utilitarian motivations in online consumption: dimensional structure and scales. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 13, 188–204 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martínez-López, F., Pla-Gracía, C., Gázquez-Abad, J., Rodríguez-Ardura, I.: Hedonic motivations in online consumption Behaviour. Int. J. Bus. Environ. 8(2), 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. Ono, A., et al.: Consumer motivations in browsing online stores with mobile devices. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 16(4), 153–178 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schröder, H., Zaharia, S.: Linking multi-channel customer Behaviour with shopping motives: an empirical investigation of a German retailer. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 15, 452–468 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Statista: Anteil der Online-Käufer an der Bevölkerung nach Ländern weltweit im Jahr 2017 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. Swaminathan, V., Rohm, A.J.: A typology of online shoppers based on shopping motivations. J. Bus. Res. 57(7), 748–757 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zaharia, S.: Multi-Channel-Retailing und Kundenverhalten. Wie sich Kunden informieren und wie sie einkaufen, 1st edn., Köln (2006)Google Scholar
  22. Zaharia, S., Hackstetter, T.: Segmentierung von Onlinekäufern auf Basis ihrer Einkaufsmotive. In: Dialogmarketing Perspektiven 2016/2017, pp. 45–72, Wiesbaden (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Applied Sciences NiederrheinKrefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations