Interactive Systems in the Student-Bank Relationship: A Research on the Views of the University of Bucharest Students on the Utility and Adaptability of HCI Technologies

  • Valentin Mihai LeoveanuEmail author
  • Mihaela Cornelia Sandu
  • Adela Coman
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11588)


The analysis of how students interact with the virtual banking space through ATMs provides both banks that create and offer targeted clients customized banking services as well as HCI Banking technology designers, verifiable data about the utility and the adaptability to customer requirements of these technologies.

The present study is based on research conducted through interviews and questionnaires addressed to students from the University of Bucharest, which examines how the computer-based interface facilitates or hampers students’ access to specialized services dedicated to them (bank accounts, debit or credit cards, other bank services).

The motivation for the study lies in the following considerations: students who are today’s clients of a bank must be attracted and maintained as tomorrow’s clients of the same bank; students are very receptive to new information technologies, understand and use them more easily than other categories of clients and can provide credible feedback on HCI; banks use the co-branding strategy (association with institutions or companies) to provide students with various types of benefits (free of charge services or discounts for shows and events).

The research is reflected in the analysis of the factors that stimulate the use of HCI technologies by students in relation to a bank and so, present study is both a quantitative and qualitative analysis of data collected by applying a questionnaire to the Romanian students of the University of Bucharest that hold an ATM cards.

The results aim to highlight the relevance of understanding the needs of student-users in the process of designing or improving both banking services and related supportive HCI technologies.


Automated Teller Machine Compatibility and consistency Flexibility Perceptual limitation Utility and user guidance 


  1. Calayag, M.E., Regala, D.M.M., Rivera, C.J.R., Tancio, D.M.N.: A comparative study of different automated teller machine and its effectiveness based on customer’s satisfaction. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. Sci. 2017(1), 49–102 (2018).
  2. Camilli, M., Dibitonto, M., Vona, A., Medaglia, C.M., Di Nocera, Fr.: User-centered design approach for interactive kiosks: evaluation and redesign of an automatic teller machine. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGCHI Italian Chapter International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Facing Complexity, CHItaly 2011, Alghero, Italy, 13–16 September (2011).
  3. Comrey, A.L., Lee, H.B.: A First Course in Factor Analysis, 2nd edn, p. 217. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)Google Scholar
  4. Cornell, D.: Fearless Forecast: The ATM industry in 2019 (2019). Accessed 11 Jan 2019
  5. Costa, B., Pires, P.J., Hernandez, J.M.C.: Automated Teller Machines’ adoption: an application of the Technology Acceptance Model. Revista de Administração e Inovação São Paulo 4(1), 40–56 (2007).
  6. Curran, K., King, D.: Investigating the human computer interaction problems with automated teller machine navigation menus. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 5(1), 59–79 (2008). Scholar
  7. Deacu, E.: Sondaj. Aproape 4 din 10 români îşi autoevaluează cunoştinţele financiare ca fiind mediocre sau foarte slabe. Adevarul (2018).
  8. El-Haddad, A.B., Almahmeed, M.A.: ATM banking behaviour in Kuwait: a consumer survey. Int. J. Bank Mark. 10(3), 25–32 (1992). Scholar
  9. Galadanci, B.S., Abdulwahab, L.: The acceptance and use of automated teller machine (ATMs) by undergraduate students. Dutse J. Pure Appl. Sci. 2(1), 39–47 (2016).
  10. Kaiser, H.F.: An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(1), 31–36 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Katircioglu, S.T., Tumer, M., Kılınç, C.: Bank selection criteria in the banking industry: an empirical investigation from customers in Romanian cities. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 5(14), 5551–5558 (2011). ISSN 1993-8233
  12. Lin, H.X., Choong, Y.-Y., Salvendy, G.: A proposed index of usability: a method for comparing the relative usability of different software systems. Behav. Inf. Technol. 16(4/5), 267–278 (1997). Scholar
  13. Melenciuc, S.: The fall of the cash machine: Romanian banks cut ATM networks by 5 pct in 1.5 years, despite growing number of cards and transactions. Bus. Rev. (2018). Accessed 09 Aug 2018
  14. Mersch, Y.: Why Europe still needs cash. European Central Bank. Frankfurt/Main (2017).
  15. Moeckel, C.: Human-computer interaction for security research: the case of EU E-banking systems. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 406–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). Scholar
  16. Omari, O.J., Zachary, O.B.: Investigating ATM system accessibility for people with visual impairments. IOSR J. Comput. Eng. (IOSR-JCE) 15(5), 13–18 (2013). e-ISSN 2278–0661, p-ISSN 2278-8727. www.iosrjournals.orgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. OTP Bank: The Financial Behavior of Romanians. The Right to Education Foundation, Bucharest (2018).
  18. Quantzig: Gear Up for The Top 5 Banking Industry Trends That are Going to Dominate in 2019 (2019).
  19. Revelle, W.: Package ‘psych’ (2018).
  20. Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G.: Statistical Methods, 8th edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames (1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Tavakol, M., Dennick, R.: Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int. J. Med. Educ. 2, 53 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang, M., Wang, F., Deng, H., Yin, J.: A survey on human computer interaction technology for ATM. Int. J. Intell. Eng. Syst. 6(1), 20–29 (2013). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valentin Mihai Leoveanu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mihaela Cornelia Sandu
    • 1
  • Adela Coman
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations