Advertisement

Integrated Pest Management Methods and Considerations Concerning Implementation in Greenhouses

  • Joop C. van LenterenEmail author
  • Philippe C. Nicot
Chapter
  • 27 Downloads
Part of the Plant Pathology in the 21st Century book series (ICPP, volume 9)

Abstract

We consider IPM as a combination of durable, environmentally, toxicologically and economically justifiable farming practices which prevent pest damage primarily through the use of natural factors limiting pest population growth and disease development, and which resort only if needed to other, preferably non-chemical, measures. IPM is not simply a combination of various control methods. We give an overview of IPM measures used in greenhouses and refer to specific chapters in this book for examples. In IPM, each practical situation dictates a number of special aspects for consideration, and IPM methods need continuous adaptation, making IPM knowledge intensive and interactive. Successful IPM programmes for greenhouse crops have a number of characteristics in common: (a) their use was promoted only after a complete IPM programme had been developed, (b) intensive support by the extension service was essential during initial implementation, (c) the costs of crop protection with IPM should not be higher than those of a chemical control programme, and (d) non-chemical management methods, such as biocontrol agents and resistant plant material, should be as easily available, as reliable, and as constant in quality, as chemical agents. IPM research and implementation in greenhouses during the past 50 years has taught us the lesson that the development of an IPM programme needs to be discussed in a very early stage with all stakeholders, including growers, pest management specialists, extension services and researchers. Such a meeting often results in a pragmatic design of a draft, very pragmatic IPM programme, which is continuously adapted during later meetings, based on growers’ experience and new research results.

Keywords

Pest prevention Pest reduction Cultural control Curative control Host-plant resistance Natural biocontrol Classical biocontrol Conservation biocontrol Augmentative biocontrol Semiochemical control 

References

  1. Achuo EA, Prinsen E, Hofte M (2006) Influence of drought, salt stress and abscisic acid on the resistance of tomato to Botrytis cinerea and Oidium neolycopersici. Plant Pathol 55(2):178–186.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01340.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albajes R, Gullino ML, van Lenteren JC, Elad Y (eds) (1999) Integrated pest and disease management in Greenhouse crops. Kluwer Publishers, Dordrecht. 545 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert R, Kunstler A, Lantos F, Adam AL, Kiraly L (2017) Graft-transmissible resistance of cherry pepper (Capsicum annuum var. cerasiforme) to powdery mildew (Leveillula taurica) is associated with elevated superoxide accumulation, NADPH oxidase activity and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 39(2) doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2353-5
  4. Bacon SJ, Bacher S, Aebi A (2012) Gaps in border controls are related to quarantine alien insect invasions in Europe. PLoS One 7(10):e47689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benuzzi M, Ladurner E (2017) Plant protection tools in organic farming. In: Vacante V, Kreiter S (eds) Handbook of pest management in organic farming. CABI, Wallingford, pp 24–59Google Scholar
  6. Bourguet D, Guillemaud T (2016) The hidden and external costs of pesticide use. In: Lightfouse E (ed) Sustanable agriculture reviews. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler DM, Kokalis-Burelle N, Albano JP, McCollum TG, Muramoto J, Shennan C, Rosskopf EN (2014) Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) combined with soil solarization as a methyl bromide alternative: vegetable crop performance and soil nutrient dynamics. Plant Soil 378(1):365–381.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-014-2030-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buurma JS, Lamine C, Haynes I (2012) Transition to consumer-driven value chains in The Netherlands. Acta Hortic 2012:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvo FJ, Bolckmans K, Belda JE (2012a) Release rate for a pre-plant application of Nesidiocoris tenuis for Bemisia tabaci control in tomato. BioControl 57:809–817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calvo FJ, Bolckmans K, Belda JE (2012b) Biological control-based IPM in sweet pepper greenhouses using Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Biocontrol Sci Tech 22:1398–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CBD (1993) Convention on biological diversity (with annexes). Concluded at Rio de Janeiro on 5 June 1992. United Nation Treaty Ser 1760(30619):142–382Google Scholar
  12. Cerf M, Bail L, Lusson M, Omon B (2017) Contrasting intermediation practices in various advisory service networks in the case of the French Ecophyto plan. J Agric Educ Ext 23(3):231–244.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224x.2017.1320641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chambre d’Agriculture des Bouches-du-Rhône (2017) Salades d’abri en Provence Se protéger des pucerons. http://www.grab.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/6-fiche-APREL-CA-13-chrysope-contre-pucerons-salade-2017.pdf. Accessed on 22 Dec 2017
  14. Cock MJW, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Barratt BIP, Bigler F, Bolckmans K, Consoli FL, Haas F, Mason PG, Parra JRP (2010) Do new access and benefit sharing procedures under the convention on biological diversity threaten the future of biological control? BioControl 55:199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colla G, Rouphael Y (2015) Biostimulants in horticulture. Sci Hortic 196(Supplement C):1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.10.044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Datnoff LE, Elmer WH, Huber DM (2007) Mineral nutrition and plant disease. American Phytopathological Society (APS Press), St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  17. de Ponti OMB, Mollema C (1992) Emerging breeding strategies for insect resistance. In: Stalker HT, Murphy JP (eds) Plant breeding in the 1990s. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, pp 323–347Google Scholar
  18. Decognet V, Ravetti F, Martin C, Nicot PC (2010) Improved leaf pruning reduces development of stem cankers caused by grey mould in greenhouse tomatoes. Agron Sustain Dev 30(2):465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dicke M (2016) Plant phenotypic plasticity in the phytobiome: a volatile issue. Curr Opin Plant Biol 32:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dutch Ministry of Agriculture (2005) Durable crop protection: policy for crop protection towards 2010. Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  21. EC (2009) Sustainable use directive. European Parliament and of the council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for community action to achieve the sustainable use of pesticides. Off J Eur Union L309:71–86Google Scholar
  22. Erisman JW, van Eekeren N, de Wit J, Koopmans C, Cuijpers W, Oerlemans N, Koks BJ (2016) Agriculture and biodiversity: a better balance benefits both. AIMS Agric Food 1:157–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. FAO/IPPC (1997) International plant protection convention. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. Fenoll J, Garrido I, Vela N, Ros C, Navarro S (2017) Enhanced degradation of spiro-insecticides and their leacher enol derivatives in soil by solarization and biosolarization techniques. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(10):9278–9285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8589-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gamliel A, van Bruggen AHC (2016) Maintaining soil health for crop production in organic greenhouses. Sci Hortic 208(Supplement C):120–130.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.12.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grumet R, Colle M, Ando K, Xie D-S, Havenga L, Switzenberg JA (2013) Modified plant architecture to enhance crop disease control: genetic control and possible value of upright fruit position in cucumber. Eur J Plant Pathol 135(3):545–560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-012-0087-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Han P, Lavoir AV, Le Bot J, Amiens-Desneux E, Desneux N (2014) Nitrogen and water availability to tomato plants triggers bottom-up effects on the leafminer Tuta absoluta. Sci Rep 4:8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffland E, Jeger MJ, van Beusichem ML (2000) Effect of nitrogen supply rate on disease resistance in tomato depends on the pathogen. Plant Soil 218(1–2):239–247.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014960507981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jørgensen LN, Bosch F, Oliver RP, Heick TM, Paveley ND (2017) Targeting fungicide inputs according to need. Annu Rev Phytopathol 55(1):181–203.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kappers IF, Hoogerbrugge H, Bouwmeester HJ, Dicke M (2011) Variation in herbivory-induced volatiles among cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) varieties has consequences for the attraction of carnivorous natural enemies. J Chem Ecol 37:150–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Katan J (2017) Disease caused by soilborne pathogens: biology, management and challenges. J Plant Pathol 99(2):305–315Google Scholar
  32. Kyriacou MC, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Zrenner R, Schwarz D (2017) Vegetable grafting: the implications of a growing agronomic imperative for vegetable fruit quality and nutritive value. Front Plant Sci 8:741.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00741CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. La Torre A, Battaglia V, Caradonia F (2016) An overview of the current plant biostimulant legislations in different European member states. J Sci Food Agric 96(3):727–734.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Le Mire G, Nguyen ML, Fassotte B, du Jardin P, Verheggen F, Delaplace P, Jijakli MH (2016) Implementing plant biostimulants and biocontrol strategies in the agroecological management of cultivated ecosystems. A review. Biotechnol Agron Soc 20:299–313Google Scholar
  35. Louws FJ, Rivard CL, Kubota C (2010) Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weeds. Sci Hortic 127(2):127–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mason PG, Cock MJW, Barratt BIP, van Lenteren JC, Brodeur J, Klapwijk JN, Consôli FL, Hoelmer K, Heimpel GE (2018) Best practices for the use and exchange of biological control genetic resources relevant for food and agriculture. BioControl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9810-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazzola M, Freilich S (2017) Prospects for biological soilborne disease control: application of indigenous versus synthetic microbiomes. Phytopathology 107(3):256–263.  https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-09-16-0330-rvwCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Messelink GJ, Bennison J, Alomar O, Ingegno BL, Tavella L, Shipp L, Palevsky E, Wäckers FL (2014) Approaches to conserving natural enemy populations in greenhouse crops: current methods and future prospects. BioControl 59:377–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nicot PC, Bardin M (2012) Biological and integrated protection in the Mediterranean greenhouse: is disease management the weak link? IOBC WPRS Bull 80:11–17Google Scholar
  40. Nicot PC, Fabre R, Lebkara T, Ozayou S, Abro MA, Duffaud M, Lecompte F, Jeannequin B (2012) Manipulating nitrogen fertilization for the management of diseases in the tomato greenhouse: what perspectives for IPM? IOBC WPRS Bull 80:333–338Google Scholar
  41. Norldlund DA, Jones RL, Lewis WJ (1981) Semiochemicals and their role in pest control. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Oka Y, Shapira N, Fine P (2007) Control of root-knot nematodes in organic farming systems by organic amendments and soil solarization. Crop Prot 26(10):1556–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Öz H, Coskan A, Atilgan A (2017) Determination of effects of various plastic covers and biofumigation on soil temperature and soil nitrogen form in greenhouse solarization: new solarization cover material. J Polym Environ 25(2):370–377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-016-0819-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pane C, Villecco D, Pentangelo A, Lahoz E, Zaccardelli M (2012) Integration of soil solarization with Brassica carinata seed meals amendment in a greenhouse lettuce production system. Acta Agric Scand B Soil Plant Sci 62(4):291–299.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2011.613850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pannacci E, Lattanzi B, Tei F (2017) Non-chemical weed management strategies in minor crops: a review. Crop Prot 96(Supplement C):44–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pappas ML, Broekgaarden C, Broufas GD, Kant MR, Messelink GJ, Steppuhn A, Wackers F, van Dam NM (2017) Induced plant defences in biological control of arthropod pests: a double-edged sword. Pest Manag Sci 73(9):1780–1788.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Pérez-Hedo M, Suay R, Alonso M, Ruocco M, Giorgini M, Poncet C, Urbaneja A (2017) Resilience and robustness of IPM in protected horticulture in the face of potential invasive pests. Crop Prot 97:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pimentel D, Burgess M (2014) Environmental and economic costs of the application of pesticides primarily in the United States. In: Pimentel D, Peshin R (eds) Integrated pest management. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 47–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Prenafeta-Boldu FX, Trillas I, Vinas M, Guivernau M, Caceres R, Marfa O (2017) Effectiveness of a full-scale horizontal slow sand filter for controlling phytopathogens in recirculating hydroponics: from microbial isolation to full microbiome assessment. Sci Total Environ 599:780–788.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Radcliffe EB, Hutchinson WD, Cancelado RE (eds) (2009) Integrated pest management: concepts, tactics, strategies and case studies. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  51. Röling NG, van de Fliert E (1994) Transforming extension for sustainable agriculture: the case of integrated pest management in rice in Indonesia. Agric Hum Values 11:96–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scarlett K, Collins D, Tesoriero L, Jewell L, van Ogtrop F, Daniel R (2016) Efficacy of chlorine, chlorine dioxide and ultraviolet radiation as disinfectants against plant pathogens in irrigation water. Eur J Plant Pathol 145(1):27–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-015-0811-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schlatter D, Kinkel L, Thomashow L, Weller D, Paulitz T (2017) Disease suppressive soils: new insights from the soil microbiome. Phytopathology 107(11):1284–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-03-17-0111-rvwCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwarz D, Rouphael Y, Colla G, Venema JH (2010) Grafting as a tool to improve tolerance of vegetables to abiotic stresses: thermal stress, water stress and organic pollutants. Sci Hortic 127(2):162–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2010.09.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Seebens H, Blackburn TM, Dyer EE, Genovesi P, Hulme PE, Jeschke JM, Pagad S, Pysek P, Winter M, Arianoutsou M, Bacher S, Blasius B, Brundu G, Capinha C, Celesti-Grapov L, Dawson W, Dullinger S, Fuentes N, Jaeger H, Kartesz J, Kenis M, Kreft H, Kuehn L, Lenzner B, Liebhold A, Mosena A, Moser D, Nishino M, Pearman D, Pergl J, Rabitsch W, Rojas-Sandoval J, Roques A, Rorke S, Rossinelli S, Roy HE, Scalera R, Schindler S, Stajerova K, Tokarska-Guzik B, van Kleunen M, Walker K, Weigelt P, Yamanaka T, Essl F (2017) No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat Commun 8(14435):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shrestha U, Auge RM, Butler DM (2016) A meta-analysis of the impact of anaerobic soil disinfestation on pest suppression and yield of horticultural crops. Front Plant Sci 7:20.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Suthaparan A, Solhaug KA, Stensvand A, Gislerod HR (2017) Daily light integral and day light quality: potentials and pitfalls of nighttime UV treatments on cucumber powdery mildew. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 175:141–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.08.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tillman D, Reich P, Isbell F (2012) Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance or herbivory. PNAS 109:10394–10397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tivoli B, Calonnec A, Richard B, Ney B, Andrivon D (2013) Current knowledge on plant/canopy architectural traits that reduce the expression and development of epidemics. Eur J Plant Pathol 135(3):471–478.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-012-0066-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Lenteren JC (1993) Integrated pest management: the inescapable future. In: Zadoks JC (ed) Modern crop protection: developments and perspectives. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, pp 217–225Google Scholar
  61. van Lenteren JC (2000) A greenhouse without pesticides: fact or fantasy? Crop Prot 19(6):375–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(00)00038-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Lenteren JC (2009) In: Radcliffe EB, Hutchinson WD, Cancelado RE (eds) IPM in greenhouse vegetables and ornamentals. Integrated Pest management: concepts, tactics, strategies and case studies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 354–365Google Scholar
  63. van Lenteren JC, Woets J (1988) Biological and integrated pest control in greenhouses. Annu Rev Entomol 33:239–269.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.33.010188.001323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. van Lenteren JC, Bolckmans K, Köhl J, Ravensberg W, Urbaneja A (2018) Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: plenty of new opportunities. BioControl.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9801-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vargas-Hernandez M, Macias-Bobadilla I, Guevara-Gonzalez RG, Romero-Gomez SD, Rico-Garcia E, Ocampo-Velazquez RV, Alvarez-Arquieta LD, Torres-Pacheco I (2017) Plant Hormesis management with biostimulants of biotic origin in agriculture. Front Plant Sci 8:11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vela N, Fenoll J, Navarro G, Garrido I, Navarro S (2017) Trial of solar heating methods (solarization and biosolarization) to reduce persistence of neonicotinoid and diamide insecticides in a semiarid Mediterranean soil. Sci Total Environ. 590-591 (Supplement C):325–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ximenez-Embun MG, Castanera P, Ortego F (2017) Drought stress in tomato increases the performance of adapted and non-adapted strains of Tetranychus urticae. J Insect Physiol 96:73–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2016.10.015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu XM, Robinson J, Else MA (2013) Effects of nitrogen input and deficit irrigation within the commercial acceptable range on susceptibility of strawberry leaves to powdery mildew. Eur J Plant Pathol 135(4):695–701.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-012-0106-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yakhin OI, Lubyanov AA, Yakhin IA, Brown PH (2017) Biostimulants in plant science: a global perspective. Front Plant Sci 7:32.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.02049CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of EntomologyWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Plant Pathology UnitINRAEMontfavetFrance

Personalised recommendations