Advertisement

China’s Globalization and the Belt and Road Project: The Case of Indonesia and Malaysia

  • Geoffrey C. Gunn
Chapter
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)

Abstract

This chapter seeks to position two countries straddling mainland and maritime Southeast Asia within China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), namely Indonesia and Malaysia. China’s BRI is not seen as threatening per se, this is related with our theme of the book. While in Indonesia the Bandung Railroad project funded by China also remains an area of controversy, in contrast to Malaysia, Chinese projects in Indonesia are spread more widely ranging from infrastructure, steel, agriculture and high technology. In the case of Indonesia, China must step carefully with its high profile initiatives, especially given the history of nationalistic backlash against the nation’s small but economically important Chinese minority. In Malaysia, Chinese investment in transport infrastructure—including grandiose railway projects—appeared to trigger a strong reaction in 2018 on the part of the incoming government led by newly sworn-in Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad citing potential indebtedness and echoes of neo-colonialism.

Keywords

ASEAN Belt and Road Indonesia Mahathir Malaysia 

References

  1. Anon. 2017. Ministry of Commerce, PRC “Statistics on China-Indonesia Trade in January–November 2017”. http://english.mofcom.gov.cn/article/statistic/lanmubb/ASEAN/201712/20171202691130.shtml.
  2. ———. 2018b. In Mahathir’s Malaysia, Japan Is Back Amid Doubts over Chinese Funding. REUTERS Asahi Shimbun, June 10. http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201806100024.html.
  3. ———. 2018c. Indonesia Calls for Self-Inspection Amid Stagnant High-Speed Railway Project. People’s Daily online, January 11. http://en.people.cn/n3/2018/0111/c90000-9314327.html.
  4. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F. 2017. China’s Maritime Silk Road Initiative and South Asia: A Political Economic Analysis of Its Purposes, Perils, and Promise. London: Palgrave Macmillan, November.Google Scholar
  5. Butcher, John G., and R.E. Elson. 2017. How Did Indonesia Become an Archipelagic State? The Strategist, May 11. https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/indonesia-became-archipelagic-state/.
  6. Chen, Laurie. 2018. Why Belt and Road Risks Fail to Deter Chinese Firms. South China Morning Post, April 16, p. B1.Google Scholar
  7. Gunn, Geoffrey C. 1986–1987. The Garuda and the Dragon: Indonesian-Chinese Relations, Asia-Pacific Review (Australian Institute of International Affairs), No. 5, Summer, pp. 17–34.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 2014. Indonesia in 2013: Oligarchs, Political Tribes, and Populists. Asian Survey 54 (1): 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. ———. 2018. Indonesia in 2017: Shoring Up the Pancasila State. Asian Survey 58 (1): 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. ———. 2019. Indonesia in 2018. Asian Survey 59 (1): 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kahin, George McT., and Audrey Kahin. 1997. Subversion as Foreign Policy: The Secret Eisenhower and Dulles Debacle in Indonesia. Seattle, WT: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lee, Liz, Rozanna Latiff, Ben Blanchard, and Praveen Menon. 2018. Malaysia’s Mahathir Cancels China-Backed Rail, Pipeline Projects. Reuters, August 21. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-malaysia/malaysian-pm-mahathir-says-china-backed-rail-pipeline-projects-canceled-for-now-reports-idUSKCN1L60DQ.
  13. Leifer, Michael. 1983. Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, Peter, and Anuradha Raghu. 2018. Mahathir Warns Against New “Colonialism” During Visit to China. Bloomberg News, August 20. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-20/mahathir-warns-against-new-colonialism-during-visit-to-china.
  15. Mozinga, David. 1976. Chinese Policy Toward Indonesia, 1949–1967. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pandjaitan, Luhut B. 2018. Why Jakarta Can Be an Honest Broker Between Powers. South China Morning Post, April 10.Google Scholar
  17. Romero, Nicholas. 2018. China’s Brain, Malaysia’s Pain: Malaysia’s Mahathir Should Reconsider Alibaba’s City Brain First, June 6. Accessed December 19, 2018. https://thediplomat.com/2018/06/chinas-brain-malaysias-pain/.
  18. Rozman, Gilbert, and Joseph Chinyong Liow, eds. 2018. International Relations and Asia’s Southern Tier: ASEAN, Australia, and India. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Sukma, Rizal. 1999. Indonesia and China: The Politics of a Troubled Relationship. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sukumaran, Tashny. 2018. Malaysia Still Talking to Beijing on Rail Link. South China Morning Post, November 10.Google Scholar
  21. Tan C.K. 2018. Malaysia to Send Envoy to China to Renegotiate Contracts. Nikkei Asian Review, June 6. https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/Malaysia-in-transition/Malaysia-to-send-envoy-to-China-to-renegotiate-contracts.
  22. Wong, Catherine. 2018. China’s Stalled Investments to Top Agenda When Malaysian Envoy Visits Beijing, Observers Say. Close Aide to Recently Re-elected Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad Is Expected to Pave Way for Leader’s Trip Next Month. South China Morning Post, July 17. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2155710/south-china-sea-disputes-stalled-investments-top-agenda.
  23. Xinhua. 2010. Indonesian President Visits China to Boost Bilateral Trades, Shanghai, October 25.Google Scholar
  24. Yuniar, Resty Woro. 2018. “Road” Plan Review if Prabowo Is Elected. South China Morning Post, October 23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey C. Gunn
    • 1
  1. 1.Nagasaki UniversityNagasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations