The New Silk Road

  • Jean A. Berlie
Part of the Politics and Development of Contemporary China book series (PDCC)


The name Silk Road is ancient and continues to be very attractive with 2000 years of history. Globalization also has a long history but came into fashion late in the 1980s. The Western empires succeeded to develop trade and economic exchanges, culture and education, which were also part of the colonial discourse. At present globalization is much more global. For China, it is implicitly linked with the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) which starts in Central Asia. China’s discourse on political economy, geopolitics and world trade occupy a very important space. Infrastructure development is essential to really establish the Belt and Road program, which was initiated in 2013. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) predicates modernity, multiculturalism, interdisciplinarity and the Internet strengthens it. International arbitration has to be developed to make the New Silk Road more global.


Africa Arbitration ASEAN Belt and Road Central Asia Development Globalization Harmony Infrastructure Silk Road 


  1. Abi-Saab, Georges. 1996. The International Court as a World Court. In Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice, ed. Vaughan Lowe and Malgosia Fitzmaurice, 3–16. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Action Plan on the Belt and Road Initiative. 2015. Accessed August 16, 2018.
  3. Annan. n.d. Globalization Quotes. Accessed August 23, 2018.
  4. Bajpai, Kanti, Huang Jing, and Kishore Mahbubani. 2016. Conclusion. In China-India Relations: Cooperation and Conflict, ed. Huang Mahbubani Bajpai, 198–217. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Beeson, Mark, and Shaomin Xu. 2016. Leadership with Chinese Characteristics: What Role for Soft Power. In Global and Regional Leadership of BICS Countries, ed. Stephen Kingah and Cintia Quiliconi, 169–188. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, Charlie. 2007. The New Silk Road. Time, November 13, 2017, pp. 20–27.Google Scholar
  7. Cartier, Carolyn. 2001. Globalizing South China. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan Lai-Ha, Pak K. Lee, and Gerald Chan. 2012. China’s Vision of Global Governance: A Resurrection of the “Central Kingdom”? In China Joins Global Governance: Cooperation and Contentions, ed. Mingjiang Li. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  9. Chan, Steve. 2016. China’s Troubled Waters: Maritime Disputes in Theoretical Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chau Ju-Kua. 1911. Work on the Chinese and Arab Trade in the Twelfth and Thirteen Centuries. St Petersburg: Imperial Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  11. China. 2017. (Prusinowska, Monika).; Accessed May 9, 2018. . Tsinghua China Law Review 10 (33): 16.
  12. Clark, Ian. 1999. Globalization and International Relations Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. De Vera, Carlos. 2004. Arbitrating Harmony: “MED-ARB” and the Confluence of Culture and Rule of Law in the Resolution of International Commercial Disputes in China. Columbia Journal of Asian Law 18 (1): 149–194. PDF.Google Scholar
  14. (The) Diplomat. December 12, 2014. Accessed August 22, 2018.
  15. Djordjevic, Branislav. C. 2016. The Current Situation and Prospect of Policy Coordination of the Belt and Road Between China and the EU. In China and Central and Eastern European Cooperation: The Belt and Road Initiative, ed. Huang Ping, 52–63. USA: Paths International Ltd.Google Scholar
  16. Flynn, Dennis, and G. Arturo. 1996. Silk for Silver: Manila-Macao in the 17th Century. Philippine Studies 44 (1): 58–62.Google Scholar
  17. Franck, Irene M., and David M. Brown. 1986. The Silk Road: A History. London: Facts on File Publication.Google Scholar
  18. Fu. 2018. Belt and Road: Fu Xiu-Mei, Han-Xue Chen and Zhen-Kai Xue. May 2018. Construction of the Belt and Road Trade Cooperation Network from the Multi-Distances Perspective. Sustainability 10 (5). Authors at Ocean University of China, Qingdao. Accessed August 11, 2018.
  19. Gernet, Jacques. 1994. L’intelligence de la Chine. Le social et le mental (The Intelligence of China…). Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  20. Grimmer, Sarah, and Christina Charemi. May 22, 2017. Dispute Resolution Along the Belt and Road. In The Asia-Pacific Arbitration Review 2018. Accessed June 11, 2018.
  21. Guo Yemin 郭晔旻. 2018. Silu xiaoshi丝路小史(海丝卷)被世界改变, 也改变着世界 Silk Road, A Short History (Maritime Volume): The Past Changing World and the Change Which Transforms the World. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Guthrie, Doug. 2009. China and Globalization: The Social, Economic and Political Transformation of Chinese Society. Rev. ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hayton, Bill. 2014. The South China Sea: The Struggle for Power in Asia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hedin, Sven. 1938. The Silk Road. Translated from the Swedish by F.H. Lyon. New York: E. P. Dutton.Google Scholar
  25. Hopkins, A.G., ed. 2002. Globalization in World History. London: Pimlico.Google Scholar
  26. Hung Ho-fung, ed. 2009. Introduction… and a Caveat… In China and the Transformation of Global Capitalism, 1–21 and 188–202. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. IBA Guidelines. 2014. IBA Guidelines on Conflict of Interest in International Arbitration. London: International Bar Association. Adopted on October 23, 2014, Updated August 10, 2015.Google Scholar
  28. Infrastructure SCMP. 2018. South China Morning Post. July 31. Accessed August 7, 2018.
  29. Jullien, F., and Thierry Marchaisse. 2000. Penser d’un dehors (La Chine)… (Thinking from Outside, China…). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  30. Karachi. November 2018. Accessed November 2018.
  31. Kerr, Pauline, and Geoffrey Wiseman. 2018. (1st ed. 2013). Diplomacy in a Globalizing World. Theories and Practices. New York: Oxford University Press, 263 p. “National Governments … Have Their Own Distinctive … Hard Power and Soft Power,” 298–299. CCP Congress in 2007 and 2012 Developed the Concept of Cultural “Soft Power.”Google Scholar
  32. Languages. 2019. Most Spoken Languages. Accessed March 29, 2019.
  33. Li Mingjiang, ed. 2012. China Joins Global Governance: Cooperation and Contentions. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  34. Loti, Pierre C. 1911. Les derniers jours de Pékin. Paris: Payot. Rep. 2014.Google Scholar
  35. Lowe, Vaughan, and Malgosia Fitzmaurice. 1996. Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice: Essays in Honour of Sir Robert Jennings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macao. January, 2019. China and Portugal, Nr 50.Google Scholar
  37. Mahan, Alfred Thayer. c.1900, Rep. 2003. The Problem of Asia: Its Effect upon International Politics. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Marsh, Ian. 2008. Globalisation and Public Opinion in Western Europe and East and Southeast Asia. In Globalization, Public Opinion and the State: Western Europe and East and Southeast Asia, ed. Ian Marsh and Takashi Inoguchi, 1–25. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Mittelman, James H. 2010. Hyperconflict: Globalization and Insecurity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Mohan, Giles. 2013. Beyond the Enclave: Toward a Political Economy of China and Africa. PDF. Accessed December 5, 2018.Google Scholar
  41. Murphy, Peter. 2018. East Timor and Its Giant Southern Neighbor. In East Timor Independence, Indonesia and ASEAN, ed. J.A. Berlie, 61–90. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. O’Neill, Daniel C. 2018. Dividing ASEAN and Conquering South China Sea: China’s Financial Power Projection. Hong Kong: HKU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Patil, V.T., and D. Gopal. 2002. Politics of Globalisation. Delhi: Authors Press.Google Scholar
  44. Polo. 1993. The Travels of Marco Polo. The Complete Yule-Cordier Edition. 2 vols. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
  45. Shenzhen Court of International Arbitration (SCIA). April 21, 2018. Its President Liu Xiaochun Is Favorable to the Promotion of International Arbitration and Cooperation with Hong Kong. Arbitration Programme. Topics Included: How to Draft an Arbitration Clause: IBA Guidelines for Drafting International Arbitration Clauses etc….Google Scholar
  46. So, Alvin Y. 2010. Globalization in China: From Neoliberal Capitalism to State Development in East Asia. In Globalization in the 21st Century: Labor, Capital, and the State on a World Scale, ed. Berch Berberoglu, 133–154. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. SRCIC. n.d. Accessed March 25, 2019.
  48. Toh Han Shih. 2017. Is China an Empire? In World Scientific, January. Accessed April 4, 2019.
  49. Trigkas, Vasilis. 2014. China’s Silk Road: A Deus Ex-Machina for Greece? Beijing: Tsinghua University.Google Scholar
  50. Trump. November 10, 2017. Accessed November 27, 2017.
  51. Turkmenistan-Foreign Relations. n.d. “Positive Neutrality” and “Open Doors”. Accessed August 13, 2018.
  52. UNDP. 2017. Promoting the Sustainable Development of Transport and Economic Corridors Under the Belt and Road Initiative. PDF.Google Scholar
  53. Van de Ven, Hans. 2002. The Onrush of Modern Globalization in China. In Globalization in World History, ed. A.G. Hopkins, 167–193. London: Pimlico. This article and Hopkins’ book are based mainly on the “archaic” globalization before the year 2000, my book deals mainly with modern globalization since 2013.Google Scholar
  54. Wang Weiguang. 2017. Belt and Road Initiative: Exploring a New Mode of Globalization (yidaiyilu: xinxing quanqiuhua de changzheng). Beijing: China Academy of Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
  55. Wuhan Arbitration Center. 2016. Accessed April 28, 2018.
  56. Yang Danzhi. 2017. Situations in Southeast Asia and Constructing Maritime Silk Road. In China’s Belt and Road Initiatives and Its Neighboring Diplomacy, ed. Zhang Jie. London: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  57. Yueh Linda. 2013, Rep. 2014. China and Globalization. 4 vols. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Zou Ying. 2017. Yidai yilu: Hezuo gongyingde Zhongguofangan 一带一路: 合作共赢的中国方案 (OBOR The Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road). Taibei: Knowledge House & Walnut Tree Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean A. Berlie
    • 1
  1. 1.The Education University of Hong KongTai PoHong Kong

Personalised recommendations