Advertisement

Influence and Inhabitation Opposed

  • James E. Christie
Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 228)

Abstract

This chapter begins with a brief description of some anti-pluralist writings from the seventeenth century. The argument is made that while a belief in pluralism rarely meant abandoning astrological thinking, the outright denial of pluralism did necessarily involve the reaffirmation of an astrological teleology. The first main section of the chapter analyses a debate between Henry More and John Butler, an Anglican minister, about the legitimacy of astrology. The chapter then continues with a discussion of how pluralism was starting to take over teleological ground from astrology. The last section of the chapter concentrates on the program of natural theology, arguing that there was a conscious effort to deny the role of celestial influence in generation, and to re-orient the understanding of God’s providence around a widely populated cosmos rather than an astrological one.

Keywords

Astrology Extraterrestrial life Henry More Teleology John Flamsteed Bernard Fontenelle Christiaan Huygens Natural theology Richard Bentley Newtonian 

References

  1. Almond, Philip. 2006. Adam, pre-Adamites, and extra-terrestrial beings in early modern Europe. Journal of Religious History 30: 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, George. 1822–1841. History and antiquities of the county of Northampton, 2 vols. London: John Bowyer Nichols & Son and John Rodwell.Google Scholar
  3. Bentley, Richard. 1836–1838. In Works, ed. Alexander Dyce. 3 vols. London: Francis Macpherson.Google Scholar
  4. Borel, Pierre. 1658. A New Treatise, Proving a Multiplicity of Worlds. Trans. D. Sashott. London: John Streater.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, Robert. 1688. A disquisition about the final causes of natural things: Where in it is inquir’d, whether, and (if at all) with what cautions, a naturalist should admit them? London: John Taylor.Google Scholar
  6. Brewster, David. 1855. Memoirs of the life, writings, and discoveries of Sir Isaac Newton, 2 vols. Edinburgh: T. Constable and Co.Google Scholar
  7. Burke, John. 1835–1838. A genealogical and heraldic history of the commoners of Great Britain and Ireland, 4 vols. London: Colburn.Google Scholar
  8. Burnet, Thomas. 1697 [1690]. The theory of the Earth, 3rd ed. 4 bks. London: Walter Kettilby.Google Scholar
  9. Burnett, Charles. 1997. The introduction of Arabic learning into England. London: British Library.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, John. 1680. Hagiastrologia, or, the most sacred and divine science of astrology. London: John Butler.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1697. The true state of the case of John Butler, B.D., a minister of the true Church of England, in answer to the libel of Martha, his sometimes wife. London: John Butler.Google Scholar
  12. Capp, Bernard Stuart. 1979. Astrology and the popular press: English almanacs 1500–1800. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  13. Cesalpino, Andrea. 1593. Quaestionum peripateticarum libri V. Venice: Giunta.Google Scholar
  14. Cheyne, George. 1705. Philosophical principles of natural religion. London: George Strahan.Google Scholar
  15. Clucas, Stephen. 1991. Poetic atomism in seventeenth-century England: Henry More, Thomas Traherne and scientific imagination. Renaissance Studies 5: 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Crawford, I.A. 2018. Widening perspectives: The intellectual and social benefits of astrobiology (regardless of whether extraterrestrial life is discovered or not). International Journal of Astrobiology 17: 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Crowe, Michael J. 1986. The extraterrestrial life debate, 1750–1900: The idea of a plurality of worlds from Kant to Lowell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Cudworth, Ralph. 1678. The true intellectual system of the universe: Wherein all the reason and philosophy of atheism is confuted, and its impossibility demonstrated. London: Richard Royston.Google Scholar
  19. Curry, Patrick. 1989. Prophecy and power: Astrology in early modern England. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. De Callatay, Godefroid, and Liana Saif. 2017. The astrological and prophetical cycles in the pseudo-Aristotelian Hermetica and in the Ikhwān al-Ṣafā’. Presented at the ‘Bilan et perspectives des études Sur les encyclopédies médiévales: Orient-occident, le ciel, l’homme, le verbe, l’animal’ organized by the ARC project speculum Arabicum, Brugelette, 2017. https://dial.uclouvain.be/pr/boreal/object/boreal:182356. Accessed 28 Nov 2017.
  21. Derham, William. 1720 [1713]. Physico-theology, or, a demonstration of the being and attributes of God from his works of creation: Being the substance of sixteen sermons preached in St. Mary-le-Bow Church, London, at the Honourable Mr. Boyle’s lectures, in the years 1711, and 1712: With large notes, and many curious observations, 5th ed. London: W. and J. Innys.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 1731 [1714]. Astro-theology: Or, a demonstration of the being and attributes of God, from a survey of the heavens, 6th ed. London: W. Innys.Google Scholar
  23. Dick, Steven J. 1982. Plurality of worlds: The origins of the extraterrestrial life debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Edleston, J., ed. 1850. Correspondence of Sir Isaac Newton and Professor Cotes: Including letters of other eminent men. London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
  25. Farley, John. 1977. The spontaneous generation controversy from Descartes to Oparin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Fletcher, John E. 1970. Astronomy in the life and correspondence of Athanasius Kircher. Isis 61: 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fontenelle, Bernard le Bovier de. 1683. Nouveaux dialogues des morts, 2 vols. 2nd ed. Lyon: Thomas Amaulry.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 1809 [1686]. Conversations on the plurality of worlds. London: Printed for Lackington Allen & co.Google Scholar
  29. Foster, Joseph. 1891. Alumni oxonienses: The members of the University of Oxford, 1500–1714. Oxford/London: Parker and Co.Google Scholar
  30. Gabbey, Alan. 1990. Henry More and the limits of mechanism. In Henry More (1614–1687) tercentenary studies, ed. Sarah Hutton, 19–36. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Geneva, Ann. 1995. Astrology and the seventeenth century mind: William Lilly and the language of the stars. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Giglioni, Guido. 2008. The cosmoplastic system of the universe: Ralph Cudworth on Stoic naturalism. Revue d’histoire des sciences 61: 313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Glomski, Jacqueline. 2015. Religion, the cosmos, and counter-reformation: Athanasius Kircher’s Itinerarium exstaticum. In Acta conventus neo-latini monasteriensis, ed. Astrid Steiner-Weber and K.A.E. Enenkel, 227–236. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  34. Goodrum, Matthew R. 2002. Atomism, atheism, and the spontaneous generation of human beings: The debate over a natural origin of the first humans in seventeenth-century Britain. Journal of the History of Ideas 63: 207–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grew, Nehemiah. 1701. Cosmologia sacra, or a discourse of the universe as it is the creature and kingdom of God. London: W. Rogers, S. Smith and B. Walford.Google Scholar
  36. Guerlac, Henry, and M.C. Jacob. 1969. Bentley, Newton, and providence: The Boyle lectures once more. Journal of the History of Ideas 30: 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harrison, Peter. 2002. Voluntarism and early modern science. History of Science 40: 63–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2009. Voluntarism and the origins of modern science: A reply to John Henry. History of Science 47: 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 2013. Laws of nature in seventeenth-century England: From Cambridge Platonism to Newtonianism. In The divine order, the human order, and the order of nature: Historical perspectives, ed. Eric Watkins, 127–148. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hatch, Robert Alan. 2017. Between astrology and Copernicanism: Morin – Gassendi – Boulliau. Early Science and Medicine 22: 487–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Haugen, Kristine Louise. 2011. Richard Bentley: Poetry and enlightenment. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Henry, John. 1990. Henry More versus Robert Boyle: The spirit of nature and the nature of providence. In Henry More (1614–1687) tercentenary studies, ed. Sarah Hutton, 55–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 2004. Metaphysics and the origins of modern science: Descartes and the importance of laws of nature. Early Science and Medicine 9: 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. ———. 2009. Voluntarist theology at the origins of modern science: A response to Peter Harrison. History of Science 47: 79–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hunter, Michael. 1995. Science and astrology in seventeenth-century England: An unpublished polemic by John Flamsteed. In Science and the shape of orthodoxy: Intellectual change in late seventeenth-century Britain, ed. idem, 245–285. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
  46. Huygens, Christiaan. 1722 [1698]. The Celestial Worlds Discover’d. Trans. John Clarke, 2nd ed. London: James Knapton.Google Scholar
  47. Jaki, Stanley L. 1978. Planets and planetarians: A history of theories of the origin of planetary systems. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Jenkin, Robert. 1700 [1696–1697]. The reasonableness and certainty of the Christian religion, 2nd ed. 2 Bks. London: P.B. and R. Wellington.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 1721 [1696–97]. The reasonableness and certainty of the Christian religion, 5th ed. 2 vols. London: printed by W.B. for Richard Sare.Google Scholar
  50. Keill, John. 1748 [1718]. An introduction to the true astronomy: Or, astronomical lectures, read in the astronomical school of the University of Oxford, 4th ed. London: Henry Lintot.Google Scholar
  51. Kircher, Athanasius. 1660 [1656]. Iter exstaticum coeleste. Wurzburg: Johann Andrea Endter.Google Scholar
  52. Koyré, Alexandre. 1957. From the closed world to the infinite universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kubrin, David. 1967. Newton and the cyclical cosmos: Providence and the mechanical philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas 28: 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lambert, Johann Heinrich. 1761. Cosmologische Briefe über die Einrichtung des Weltbaues. Augsburg: Klett.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 1976. Cosmological Letters on the Arrangement of the World-Edifice. Trans. Stanley L. Jaki. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Lovejoy, Arthur O. 1948 [1936]. The great chain of being: A study of the history of an idea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Monod, Paul Kléber. 2013. Solomon’s secret arts: The occult in the age of enlightenment. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. More, Henry. 1681. Tetractys anti-astrologica, or, the four chapters in the Explanation of the Grand Mystery of Holiness: Which contain a brief but solid confutation of judiciary astrology, with annotations upon each chapter: wherein the wondrous weaknesses of John Butler, B.D. his answer called A Vindication of Astrology, & c. are laid open… London: J.M.Google Scholar
  59. Morin, Jean-Baptiste. 1661. Astrologia gallica. The Hague: Adriaan Vlacq.Google Scholar
  60. Parker, Samuel. 1678. Disputationes de Deo et providentia divina …. London: J. Martyn.Google Scholar
  61. Poole, William. 2015. Lucretianism and some seventeenth-century theories of human origin. In Lucretius and the early modern, ed. David Norbrook, Stephen Harrison, and Philip Hardie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Raffaelli, Enrico G. 2001. L’oroscopo del mondo: il tema di nascita del mondo e delprimo uomo secondo l’astrologia zoroastriana. Milan: Mimesis.Google Scholar
  63. Raven, Charles E. 1986. John Ray, naturalist: His life and works. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Ray, John. 1714 [1691]. The wisdom of God manifested in the works of the creation, 6th ed. London: William Innys.Google Scholar
  65. Reid, Jasper William. 2012. The metaphysics of Henry More. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ross, Alexander. 1646. The new planet no planet, or, the Earth no wandring star, except in the wandring heads of Galileans. London: J. Young.Google Scholar
  67. Rutkin, H. Darrel. 2006. Why Newton rejected astrology: A reconstruction, or “Newton’s comets and the transformation of astrology”: 20 years later. Cronos 9: 85–98.Google Scholar
  68. Saumaise, Claude. 1648. De annis climactericis et antiqua astrologia diatribae. Leiden: Elzevir.Google Scholar
  69. Schaffer, Simon. 1987. Newton’s comets and the transformation of astrology. In Astrology, science, and society: Historical essays, ed. Patrick Curry, 219–243. Woodbridge/Wolfeboro: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
  70. Selden, John. 1661. Theanthropos: Or, God made man: A tract proving the nativity of our Saviour to be on the 25. of December. London: F.G.Google Scholar
  71. Sellars, John. 2012. Stoics against stoics in Cudworth’s A treatise of freewill. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20: 935–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sheppard, Kenneth. 2015. Anti-atheism in early modern England, 1580–1720: The atheist answered and his error confuted. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Simonutti, Luisa. 2001. Spinoza and Boyle: Rational religion and natural philosophy. In Religion, reason and nature in early modern Europe, ed. Robert Crocker, 117–138. Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sturmy, Daniel. 1711. A theological theory of a plurality of worlds: Being a critical, philosophical, and practical discourse, concerning visible or material worlds. London: D. Brown and J. Walthoe.Google Scholar
  75. Thomas, Keith. 1971. Religion and the decline of magic: Studies in popular beliefs in sixteenth and seventeenth century England. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
  76. Vermij, Rienk. 2016. Seventeenth-century Dutch natural philosophers on celestial influence. In Unifying heaven and earth: Essays in the history of early modern cosmology, ed. Miguel Á. Granada, Dario Tessicini, and Patrick J. Boner, 291–315. Barcelona: Edicions Universitat Barcelona.Google Scholar
  77. Vermij, Rienk, and Hiro Hirai. 2017. The marginalization of astrology: Introduction. Early Science and Medicine 22: 405–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Westman, Robert S. 2011. The Copernican question: Prognostication, skepticism, and celestial order. Berkeley/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wood, Anthony. 1691–1692. Athenae Oxonienses, 2 vols. London: Thomas Bennet.Google Scholar
  80. Wordsworth, C., ed. 1842. The correspondence of Richard Bentley. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  81. Wright, Peter. 1975. Astrology and science in seventeenth-century England. Social Studies of Science 5: 399–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • James E. Christie
    • 1
  1. 1.SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations