Advertisement

Johannes Kepler: A New Astronomy, Astrological Harmonies and Living Creatures

  • James E. Christie
Chapter
Part of the International Archives of the History of Ideas Archives internationales d'histoire des idées book series (ARCH, volume 228)

Abstract

Johannes Kepler is a key figure in both the histories of astrology and the extraterrestrial life debate. To date, however, historians have not appreciated the intimate connection between the two concepts in Kepler’s thought. This chapter presents a thorough reconstruction of Kepler’s astrological theories and an analysis of his various writings on pluralist themes, attempting to establish exactly what fuelled his commitment to the existence of extraterrestrial life and how it fitted into his highly theological cosmos. As Gilbert’s had done, Kepler’s astrological theories expanded the operation of celestial influence to centres other than the earth, and his teleological understanding of celestial influence necessitated the existence of observers (i.e. living creatures) at those centres.

Keywords

Johannes Kepler Astrology Extraterrestrial life New star Harmony Somnium 

References

  1. Bialas, Volker. 2009. Kepler’s philosophy of nature. In Johannes Kepler: From Tübingen to Żagań, ed. Richard Lynn Kremer and Jarosław Włodarczyk, 29–40. Warsaw: Institut Historii Nauki PAN.Google Scholar
  2. Boner, Patrick J. 2007. Kepler v. the Epicureans: Causality, coincidence and the origins of the new star of 1604. Journal for the History of Astronomy 38: 207–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ———. 2008. Life in the liquid fields: Kepler, Tycho and Gilbert on the nature of the heavens and Earth. History of Science 46: 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2011. Kepler’s Copernican campaign and the new star of 1604. In Change and continuity in early modern cosmology, ed. Patrick J. Boner, 93–114. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ———. 2013. Kepler’s cosmological synthesis: Astrology, mechanism and the soul. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2014. Statesman and scholar: Herwart von Hohenburg as patron and author in the republic of letters. History of Science 52: 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caspar, Max. 1993[1959]. Kepler. Ed. and Trans. Clarrise Doris Helmman. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Catling, David C. 2013. Astrobiology: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowe, Michael J. 1986. The extraterrestrial life debate, 1750–1900: The idea of a plurality of worlds from Kant to Lowell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dick, Steven J. 1982. Plurality of worlds: The origins of the extraterrestrial life debate from Democritus to Kant. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1996. Other worlds: The cultural significance of the extraterrestrial life debate. Leonardo 29: 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunér, David. 2016. Swedenborg and the plurality of worlds: Astrotheology in the eighteenth century. Zygon 51: 450–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field, J.V. 1984. A Lutheran astrologer: Johannes Kepler. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 31: 189–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ———. 1988. Kepler’s geometrical cosmology. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2009. Kepler’s harmony of the world. In Johannes Kepler: From Tübingen to Żagań, ed. Richard Lynn Kremer and Jarosław Włodarczyk, 11–28. Warsaw: Institut Historii Nauki PAN.Google Scholar
  16. Gingerich, Owen. 1973. From Copernicus to Kepler: Heliocentrism as model and as reality. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117: 513–522.Google Scholar
  17. Grafton, Anthony. 1973. Michael Maestlin’s account of Copernican planetary theory. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 117: 523–550.Google Scholar
  18. Granada, Miguel A. 2005. Kepler v. Roeslin on the interpretation of Kepler’s nova: (1) 1604–1606. Journal for the History of Astronomy 36: 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2009. Kepler and Bruno on the infinity of the universe and of solar systems. In Johannes Kepler: From Tübingen to Żagań, ed. Richard Lynn Kremer and Jarosław Włodarczyk, 131–158. Warsaw: Institut Historii Nauki PAN.Google Scholar
  20. ———. 2011a. Johannes Kepler and David Fabricius: Their discussion on the nova of 1604. In Change and continuity in early modern cosmology, ed. Patrick J. Boner, 66–92. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. ———. 2011b. After the nova of 1604: Roeslin and Kepler’s discussion on the significance of the celestial novelties (1607–1613). Journal for the History of Astronomy 42: 353–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant, Edward. 1981. Much ado about nothing: Theories of space and vacuum from the Middle Ages to the scientific revolution. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ———. 1994. Planets, stars, and orbs: The medieval cosmos, 1200–1687. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Greenbaum, Dorian Gieseler. 2015. Kepler’s personal astrology: Two letters to Michael Maestlin. In From Māshāʼ Allah to Kepler: Theory and practice in medieval and Renaissance astrology, ed. Charles Burnett and Dorian Gieseler Greenbaum, 177–200. Ceredigion: Sophia Centre Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hallyn, Fernand. 1990. The poetic structure of the world: Copernicus and Kepler. In New York. Cambridge, MA: Zone Books; Distributed by MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hirai, Hiro, ed. 2008. Cornelius Gemma: Cosmology, medicine, and natural philosophy in Renaissance Louvain. Pisa: Fabrizio Serra.Google Scholar
  27. ———. 2011. Medical humanism and natural philosophy: Renaissance debates on matter, life and the soul. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holman, Matthew J., Daniel C. Fabrycky, Darin Ragozzine, Eric B. Ford, Jason H. Steffen, William F. Welsh, Jack J. Lissauer, et al. 2010. Kepler-9: A system of multiple planets transiting a sun-like star, confirmed by timing variations. Science 330: 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jardine, Nick. 2009. God’s “ideal reader”: Kepler and his serious jokes. In Johannes Kepler: From Tübingen to Żagań, ed. Richard Lynn Kremer and Jarosław Włodarczyk, 41–52. Warsaw: Institut Historii Nauki PAN.Google Scholar
  30. Juste, David. 2010. Musical theory and astrological foundations in Kepler: The making of the new aspects. In Music and esotericism, ed. Laurence Wuidar, 177–196. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  31. Kepler, Johannes. 1937. Gesammelte werke. Edited under the supervision of the Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 25 vols published so far. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  32. ———. 1952. Epitome of Copernican astronomy: IV and V. Translated by Charles Glenn Wallis. In Great books of the Western world, volume 16: Ptolemy, Copernicus, Kepler, ed. Robert Maynard Hutchins. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica; W. Benton.Google Scholar
  33. ———. 1965. Kepler’s Conversation with Galileo’s Sidereal Messenger. Trans. Edward Rosen. New York: Johnson Reprint Corp.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1967. Somnium: The dream, or Posthumous Work on Lunar Astronomy. Trans. Edward Rosen. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  35. ———. 1981. Mysterium Cosmographicum: The Secret of the Universe. Trans. A.M. Duncan. New York: Abaris.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 1992. New Astronomy. Trans. William H. Donahue/Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 1997. The Harmony of the World. Trans. E.J. Aiton, A.M. Duncan, and J.V. Field. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
  38. Kremer, Richard Lynn, and Jarosław Włodarczyk, eds. 2009. Johannes Kepler: From Tübingen to Żagań. Warsaw: Institut Historii Nauki PAN.Google Scholar
  39. Lindberg, David C. 1986. The genesis of Kepler’s theory of light: Light metaphysics from Plotinus to Kepler. Osiris 2: 4–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Losch, Andreas. 2016. Astrotheology: On exoplanets, Christian concerns, and human hopes. Zygon 51: 405–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martens, Rhonda. 2000. Kepler’s philosophy and the new astronomy. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Methuen, Charlotte. 1996. Maestlin’s teaching of Copernicus: The evidence of his university textbook and disputations. Isis 87: 230–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 1998. Kepler’s Tübingen: Stimulus to a theological mathematics. Aldershot/Brookfield: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  44. Mix, Lucas John. 2016. Life-value narratives and the impact of astrobiology on Christian ethics. Zygon 51: 520–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Paul, Robert. 1986. Joseph Smith and the plurality of worlds idea. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 19: 13–36.Google Scholar
  46. Proclus. 1873. In primum Euclidis Elementorum librum commentarii, ed. Gottfried Friedlein. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  47. Rabin, Sheila J. 1997. Kepler’s attitude toward Pico and the anti-astrology polemic. Renaissance Quarterly 50: 750–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rutkin, H. Darrel. 2005. Galileo astrologer: Astrology and mathematical practice in the late-sixteenth and early-seventeenth centuries. Galilaeana 2: 107–143.Google Scholar
  49. ———. 2006. Various uses of horoscopes: Astrological practices in early modern Europe. In Horoscopes and public spheres: Essays on the history of astrology, ed. Günther Oestmann, H. Darrel Rutkin, and Kocku von Stuckrad, 167–182. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  50. Scaliger, Julius Caesar. 1557. Exotericarum exercitationum liber quintus decimus de subtilitate ad Hieronymum Cardanum. Paris: Michel de Vascosan.Google Scholar
  51. Seager, Sara. 2010. Exoplanet atmospheres: Physical processes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shuch, H. Paul, ed. 2011. Searching for extraterrestrial intelligence: SETI past, present, and future. Chichester: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Simon, Gérard. 1975. Kepler’s astrology: The direction of a reform. Vistas in Astronomy 18: 439–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snyder, James G. 2011. Marsilio Ficino’s critique of the Lucretian alternative. Journal of the History of Ideas 72: 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stephenson, Bruce. 1987. Kepler’s physical astronomy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. ———. 1994. The music of the heavens: Kepler’s harmonic astronomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. van den Berg, Robbert Maarten. 2001. Proclus’ hymns: Essays, translations, commentary. In Leiden. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  58. Voelkel, James R. 2001. The composition of Kepler’s Astronomia nova. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Walker, D.P. 1967. Kepler’s celestial music. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 30: 228–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • James E. Christie
    • 1
  1. 1.SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations