Advertisement

Learning Behaviors in the Wild: How People Achieve L2 Learning Outside of Class

  • Søren W. EskildsenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 38)

Abstract

This chapter represents a first attempt at building a collection of learning behaviors in L2 speakers’ social practices in the wild. Research has shown that repair, word search activities, and definition talk provide fruitful soil for L2 learning (Brouwer 2003; Eskildsen 2018a; Eskildsen and Theodórsdóttir 2017; Eskildsen and Wagner 2015; Kasper and Burch 2016; Koshik and Seo 2012; Kurhila 2006; Markee 1994; Markee Appl Ling 29:404–427, 2008; Theodórsdóttir 2018; Theodórsdóttir and Eskildsen 2011), but a principled overview of L2 speakers’ learning behaviors when using the L2 outside of class remains to be built. Filling that gap, the chapter shows three distinct learning behaviors: (1) noticing and using new word in word searches; (2) making explicit use of the expert; and (3) re-indexing previously learned items. Consisting of out-of-classroom Danish L2 interactions, the data reveal that word searches may be built in a variety of ways, sequentially and with respect to turn-taking design, but public noticing and use of the new word on the part of the L2 speaker is argued to be a recurring learning behavior in all the examples. The re-indexing of previously learned items follows talk where an L2 speaker has been previously corrected or displayed lack of understanding.

Keywords

Definition talk Noticing Repair Usage-based linguistics Word search 

References

  1. Bell, N. (Ed.). (2017). Multiple perspectives on language play. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  2. Brouwer, C. E. (2003). Word searches in NNS–NS interaction: Opportunities for language learning? The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 534–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Developmental issues in second language conversation. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brouwer, C. E. (2004). Doing pronunciation: A specific type of repair sequence. In Gardner, R. & Wagner, J. (Eds.), Second Language Conversations (pp. 93–113). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  5. Burch, A. R. (2014). Pursuing information. A conversation analytic perspective on communication strategies. Language Learning, 64(3), 651–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ellis, N. C. (2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). The L2 inventory in action: Conversation analysis and usage-based linguistics in SLA. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 337–373). Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  9. Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62(2), 335–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence?: Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eskildsen, S. W. (2017). The emergence of creativity in L2 English – A usage-based case-study. In N. Bell (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on language play (pp. 281–316). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  12. Eskildsen, S. W. (2018a). ‘We’re learning a lot of new words’: Encountering new L2 vocabulary outside of class. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 46–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eskildsen, S. W. (2018b). L2 constructions and interactional competence: Subordination and coordination in English L2 learning. In A. Tyler, L. Huang, & H. Jan (Eds.), What is applied cognitive linguistics? Answers from the L2 classroom and SLA studies (pp. 61–96). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  14. Eskildsen, S. W. (2018c). Building a semiotic repertoire for social action: Interactional competence as biographical discovery. Classroom Discourse, 9(1), 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eskildsen, S. W. (in press a). The daily routine: Learning to do public writing in the L2 classroom. In S. Kunitz, O. Sert, & Markee, N. (Eds.), Emerging issues in classroom discourse and interaction: Theoretical and applied CA perspectives on pedagogy. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Eskildsen, S. W. (in press b). From constructions to social action: The substance of English and its learning from an interactional usage-based perspective. In C. J. Hall & R. Wicaksono (Eds.), Ontologies of English. Conceptualising the language for learning, teaching, and assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eskildsen, S. W., & Majlesi, A. R. (2018). Learnables and teachables in second language talk: Advancing a social reconceptualization of central SLA tenets. Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eskildsen, S. W., & Markee, N. (2018). L2 talk as social accomplishment. In R. Alonso Alonso (Ed.), Speaking in a second language (pp. 69–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eskildsen, S. W., & Theodórsdóttir, G. (2017). Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 38(2), 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eskildsen, S., & Wagner, J. (2013). Recurring and shared gestures in the L2 classroom: Resources for teaching and learning. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eskildsen, S. W., & Wagner, J. (2015). Embodied L2 construction learning. Language Learning, 65, 419–448.Google Scholar
  22. Evnytskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners’ multimodal displays of willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (2007). S/FL learning as a social accomplishment: Elaborations on a “reconceptualised” SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91, 800–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodwin, C. (1986). Between and within: Alternative sequential treatments of continuers and assessments. Human Studies, 9(2/3), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodwin, C., & Goodwin, M. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greer, T. (this volume). Noticing words in the wild. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 131–158). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Hayashi, M. (2003). Language and the body as resources for collaborative action: A study of word searches in Japanese conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(2), 109–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hellermann, J. (2008). Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hellermann, J., Thorne, S. L., & Haley, J. (this volume). Building socio-environmental infrastructures for learning in the wild. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 193–218). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  30. Kasper, G. (2009). Locating cognition in second language interaction and learning: Inside the skull or in public view? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 47, 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kasper, G., & Burch, A. R. (2016). Orienting to focus on form in the wild. In R. A. van Compernolle & J. McGregor (Eds.), Authenticity, language, and interaction in second language contexts (pp. 198–232). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  33. Koschmann, T. (2012). Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In K. Mortensen & J. Wagner (Eds.), Conversation analysis. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1038–1043). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Koshik, I., & Seo, M.-S. (2012). Word (and other) search sequences initiated by language learners. Text & Talk, 32(2), 167–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kurhila, S. (2006). Second language interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  36. Lee, Y.-A. (2010). Learning in the contingency of talk-in-interaction. Text and Talk, 30(3), 403–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lilja, N. (2014). Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning. Journal of Pragmatics, 71, 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lilja, N., & Piirainen-Marsh, A. (2019). Connecting the language classroom and the wild: Re-enactments of language use experiences. Applied Linguistics, 40(4), 594–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Majlesi, A. R., & Broth, M. (2012). Emergent learnables in second language classroom interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 1, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second-language acquisition studies. In E. E. Tarone, S. M. Gass, & A. D. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second-language acquisition (pp. 89–116). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  41. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Markee, N. (2008). Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 404–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Markee, N. (2011). Doing, and justifying doing, avoidance. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 602–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Markee, N., & Kasper, G. (2004). Classroom talks: An introduction. The Modern Language Journal, 88(4), 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mori, J. (2010). Learning language in real time: A case study of the Japanese demonstrative pronoun ‘are’ in word-search sequences. In G. Kasper, H. t. Nguyen, D. Yoshimi, & J. K. Yoshioka (Eds.), Pragmatics in language learning (Vol. 12, pp. 15–42). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  46. Mortensen, K. (2011). Doing word explanation in interaction. In G. Pallotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 135–162). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  47. Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising ‘learning’ in applied linguistics (pp. 105–126). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018). Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: The development of L2 grammar-for-interaction. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Berger, E. (this volume). On the reflexive relation between developing L2 interactional competence and evolving social relationships: A longitudinal study of word-searches in the ‘wild’. In J. Hellermann, S. W. Eskildsen, S. Pekarek Doehler, & A. Piirainen-Marsh (Eds.), Conversation analytic research on learning-in-action (pp. 51–75). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Pekarek Doehler, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2015). The development of L2 interactional competence: Evidence from turn-taking organization, sequence organization, repair organization and preference organization. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 233–268). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  51. Piirainen-Marsh, A. & Tainio, L. (2009). Other-repetition as resource for participation in the activity of playing a video game. The Modern Language Journal, 93(2), 153–169.Google Scholar
  52. Rasmussen, G., Brouwer, C. E., & Wagner, J. (2004). Embedded corrections in second language talk. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 75–92). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  53. Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1979). Two preferences in the organization of reference to persons and their interaction. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 15–21). New York: Irvington Press.Google Scholar
  54. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. The American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seedhouse, P. (2011). Conversation analytic research into language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), The handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (Vol. II, pp. 345–363). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  58. Svennevig, J. (2004). Other-repetition as display of hearing, understanding and emotional stance. Discourse Studies, 6(4), 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and situated action: The problem of human-machinecommunication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011a). Language learning activities in everyday situations: Insisting on TCU completion in second language talk. In G. Palotti & J. Wagner (Eds.), L2 learning as a social practice: Conversation-analytic perspectives (pp. 185–208). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.Google Scholar
  61. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2011b). Second language interaction for business and learning. In J. K. Hall, J. Hellermann, & S. P. Doehler (Eds.), L2 interactional competence and development (pp. 93–116). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Theodórsdóttir, G. (2018). L2 teaching in the wild: A closer look at correction and explanation practices in everyday L2 interaction. The Modern Language Journal, 102(Supplement), 30-45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Theodórsdóttir, G., & Eskildsen, S. W. (2011). Achieving intersubjectivity and doing learning: The use of English as a lingua franca in Icelandic L2. Nordand, 6(2), 59–85.Google Scholar
  64. Turk, M. J. (1999). Negatively formulated questions in interaction. Crossroads of Language, Interaction, and Culture, 1, 39–48.Google Scholar
  65. Wagner, J. (2015). Designing for language learning in the wild. Creating social infrastructures for second language learning. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 75–104). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  66. Wagner, J., & Gardner, R. (2004). Introduction. In R. Gardner & J. Wagner (Eds.), Second language conversations (pp. 1–17). London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Design and CommunicationUniversity of Southern DenmarkSønderborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations