Epilog: Assumptions, Models, Hypotheses and Conclusions
In this chapter the author re-examines the underlying assumptions of the conceptual and hypothetical models of this volume and attempts to answers the questions: Can physicochemical properties of phenolic acids be used as tools to help understand the complex behavior of phenolic acids and the ultimate effects of phenolic acids on sensitive seedlings? What insights do laboratory bioassays and the conceptual and hypothetical models of laboratory systems provide us concerning the potential behavior and effects of phenolic acids in field systems? What potential role may phenolic acids play in broadleaf-weed seedling emergence in wheat debris no-till crop systems?
- Anderson RA, Todd JR (1968) Estimation of total tobacco plant phenols by their bonding to polyvinylpyrrolidone. Tob Sci 12:107–111Google Scholar
- Lehman ME, Blum U (1997) Cover crop debris effects on weed emergence as modified by environmental factors. Allelopathy J 4:69–88Google Scholar
- Staman K, Blum U, Louws F, Robertson D (2001) Can simultaneous inhibition of seedling growth and stimulation of rhizosphere bacterial populations provide evidence for phytotoxin transfer from plant residues in the bulk soil to the rhizosphere of sensitive species. J Chem Ecol 27:807–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar