Performativity and the Ideological Construction of the Self. The Age of Narcissism and (Possibly) Beyond

  • Marco MazzoneEmail author
Part of the Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology book series (PEPRPHPS, volume 23)


Since Austin and Searle, performatives are taken to be crucial for the construction of social reality. More recently, performatives have been proposed to be essential for the construction of personal identities, too. I intend to analyze the postmodern assumption according to which this identity construction is in the power of individuals, an assumption which presupposes a view of performatives as endowed with unconstrained power – that is, with a power that is not subject to objective constraints. I will consider some reasons to reject this view. The first is rooted in Judith Butler’s idea that – since normative approaches to political correctness undesirably reduce freedom of speech in the name of equality – we should seriously consider how offensive performatives may fail, due to objective constraints on their felicity. A second reason to reject the postmodern view of performatives lies in the consideration of narcissism as an individual and political issue. Narcissism in the political sphere can be described as a transformation of the “passion for equality” (for individual rights) in an individualistic appetite, deaf to everything else, and especially to social constraints and responsibilities. A different – less narcissistic and more social – model of the self is provided.


Ideology The self Performative Narcissism Equality Freedom of speech Judith Butler Erik Erikson 


  1. Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  2. Berzonsky, M.D. (2005). Ego identity: A personal standpoint in a postmodern world. Identity, 5(2), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech. A politics of the performative. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Côté, J.A., & Levine, C. (1987). A Formulation of Erikson’s Theory of Ego identity Formation. Developmental Review. 7, 273–325.Google Scholar
  6. de Tocqueville, A. (2010). Democracy in America: Historical-Critical Edition of De la démocratie en Amérique. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  7. Erikson, E. (1968). Identity. Youth and crisis. New York/London: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  8. Hermans, H., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Marcia, J.E. (1966). Development and validation of ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marcia, J.E. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Orsina, G. (2018). La democrazia del narcisismo. Padova: Marsilio.Google Scholar
  12. Ortega y Gasset, J.O. (1993). The revolt of the masses. New York/London: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  13. Rattansi, A., & Phoenix, A. (2005). Rethinking youth identities: Modernist and postmodernist frameworks. Identity, 5(2), 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanistic SciencesUniversity of CataniaCataniaItaly

Personalised recommendations