Advertisement

It Doesn’t Seem_It, But It Is. A Neurofilmological Approach to the Subjective Experience of Moving-Image Time

  • Ruggero EugeniEmail author
  • Stefania Balzarotti
  • Federica Cavaletti
  • Adriano D’Aloia
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology book series (PEPRPHPS, volume 23)

Abstract

This article illustrates the first steps of a research project concerning the “Subjective Experience and Estimation of Moving-Image Time” (SEEM_IT). After introducing the theoretical background of the research, that links time perception to the embodied experience of movement, the article presents the main empirical results of an experiment aimed at assessing how spectators’ time perception is affected by the style of editing and the type of represented action in short video clips. Though the style of editing played a major role in influencing SEEM_IT, it also significantly interacted with the type of represented action. The article reassesses these findings by discussing them within the theoretical framework of the research.

Keywords

Time perception Film experience Neurofilmology Duration estimation Time passage Editing Action 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this report took place within a PRIN (Research Project of National Interest) titled Perception, Performativity and Cognitive Sciences and funded by the Italian Government (2015, Grant number: 2015TM24JS - SH4; P.I. Antonio Pennisi, Università degli studi di Messina). The unit working team included Ruggero Eugeni (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, coordinator), Riccardo Manzotti (IULM – International University of Languages and Media, Milan), Adriano D’Aloia (Università degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”), Federica Cavaletti (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), and Massimo Locatelli (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore). We conducted the experiment in collaboration with Maria Rita Ciceri’s team, composed by Stefania Balzarotti and Elisa Cardani (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan). We thank Pia Tikka, Tim Smith, Patricia Pisters, Vinzenz Hediger, Maria Poulaki, Julian Hanich, Joerg Fingerhut, Francesco Sticchi, Alessandro Antonietti, Vittorio Gallese, Pietro Montani, Ninni Pennisi, and all the colleagues of the PRIN project for their useful suggestions. A special thanks to Ed Tan and Katrin Heimann for their careful reading of the paper and their comments and encouragements.

References

  1. Adam, B. (2004). Time: Key concepts. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aglioti, S.A., Cesari, P., Romani, M., & Urgesi, C. (2008). Action anticipation and motor resonance in elite basketball players. Natural Neurosciences, 11(9), 1109–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altshuler, R., & Sigrist, M.-J. (Eds.). (2016). Time and the philosophy of action. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Ames, M. (Ed.). (2012). Time in television narrative. Exploring temporality in twenty-first-century programming. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  5. Arstila, V., & Lloyd, D. (Eds.). (2014). Subjective time. The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of temporality Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bellour, R. (2009). Le corps du cinéma. Hypnoses, émotions, animalités. Paris: POL Traffic.Google Scholar
  7. Benini, A. (2017). Neurobiologia del tempo. Milano: Cortina.Google Scholar
  8. Berliner, T., & Cohen, D.J. (2011). The illusion of continuity: Active perception and the classical editing system. Journal of Film and Video, 63, 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bettetini, G. (1979). Tempo del senso. La logica temporale dei testi audiovisivi. Milano: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  10. Block, R., & Grondin, S. (2014). Timing and time perception: A selective review and commentary on recent reviews. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boltz, M.G. (1993). Time estimation and expectancies. Memory and Cognition, 21, 853–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boltz, M.G. (1998). Task predictability and remembered duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 768–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bordwell, D. (2006). The way Hollywood tells it. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, S.W. (1995). Time, change, and motion: The effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(I), 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buonomano, D. (2017). Your brain is a time machine. The neuroscience and physics of time. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  16. Burdick, A. (2017). Why time flies. A mostly scientific investigation. New York/London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Burges, J., & Elias, A.J. (Eds.). (2016). Time. A vocabulary of the present. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Carruthers, L. (2016). Doing time. Temporality, hermeneutics, and contemporary cinema. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  19. Chatman, S. (1978). Story and discourse: Narrative structure in fiction and film. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cohen, S.S., Henin, S., & Parra, L.C. (2017). Engaging narratives evoke similar neural activity and lead to similar time perception. Scientific Reports, 7(4578), 1–10.Google Scholar
  21. Colling, J.L., Thompson, W.F., & Sutton, J. (2014). The effect of movement kinematics on predicting the timing of observed actions. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 1193–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coull, J.T., Vidal, F., Burle, B. (2016). When to act, or not to act: that’s the SMA’s question. In W.H Meck, R.B. Ivry (Eds.), (pp. 14–21).Google Scholar
  23. Crow, G., & Heath, S. (Eds.). (2002). Social conceptions of time. Structure and process in work and everyday life. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  24. Currie, G. (1995). Image and mind: Film, philosophy, and cognitive science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Currie, G. (2004). Can there be a literary philosophy of time? In G. Currie (Ed.), Arts and Minds (pp. 84–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cutting, J.E. (2005). Perceiving scenes in film and in the world. In J.D. Anderson & B.F. Anderson (Eds.), Moving image theory: Ecological considerations (pp. 9–27). Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  27. Cutting, J.E., & Candan, A. (2013). Movies, evolution, and mind: From fragmentation to continuity. The Evolutionary Review, 4(3), 25–35.Google Scholar
  28. Cutting, J.E., & Candan, A. (2015). Shot durations, shot classes, and the increased pace of popular movies. Projections, 9(2), 40–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. D’Aloia, A., & Eugeni, R. (Eds.). (2014). Neurofilmology. Audiovisual studies and the challenge of neurosciences. [special issue] Cinéma et Cie. International Film Studies Journal, XIV, 22–23.Google Scholar
  30. D’Ydewalle, G., & Vanderbeeken, M. (1990). Perceptual and cognitive processing of editing rules in film. In R. Groner, G. d’Ydewalle, & R. Parham (Eds.), From eye to mind: Information acquisition in perception, search, and reading (pp. 129–139). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. D’Ydewalle, G., Desmet, G., & Van Rensbergen, J. (1998). Film perception: The processing of film cuts. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Eye guidance in reading and scene perception (pp. 357–367). Oxford: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Damasio, A. (2002). Remembering when. Scientific American, 287(3. [Special issue] A Matter of Time), 66–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. De Wied, M. (1994). The role of temporal expectancies in the production of film suspense. Poetics, 23, 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. De Wied, M., Tan, E. S. H., Frijda N. H. (1992). Duration experience under conditions of suspense in films. In F. Macar, V. Pouthas, & W.J. Friedman (Eds.), Time, Action and Cognition. Towards bridging the gap (pp. 325–336). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
  36. Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  37. Doane, M.A. (2002). The emergence of cinematic time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Drayton, L., & Furman, M. (Eds.). (2018). Time in the brain, Special issues of Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(10), 84–952; and Trends in Neurosciences, 41(10), 641–762.Google Scholar
  39. Droit-Volet, S. (2014). What emotions tell us about time.Google Scholar
  40. Droit-Volet, S., & Wearden, J. (2016). Passage of time judgements are not time judgements: Evidence from a study using experience sampling methodology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Droit-Volet, S., Fayolle, S., Lamotte, M., & Gil, S. (2013). Time, emotion and the embodiment of timing. Timing and Time Perception, 1, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Droit-Volet, S., Trahanias, P., & Maniadakis, M. (2017). Passage of time judgments in everyday life are not related to duration judgments except for long durations of several minutes. Acta Psychologica, 173, 116–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ethis, E. (2006). Les spectateurs du temps. Pour une sociologie de la réception du cinema. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  44. Fayolle, S., Droit-Volet, S., & Gil, S. (2014). Emotion and time perception: Effects of film-induced mood. In A. Vatakis (Ed.), International conference on timing and time perception, 31 March – 3 April 2014, Corfu, Greece, special issue of Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 126, pp. 251–252).Google Scholar
  45. Ferrari, P.F., & Rizzolatti, G. (Eds.). (2015). New frontiers in mirror neurons research. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Fingerhut, J., & Heimann, K. (2017). Movies and the mind: On our filmic body. In C. Durt, T. Fuchs, & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, Enaction, and culture. Investigating the constitution of the shared world (pp. 353–377). Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  47. Flaherty, M.G. (2011). The textures of time. Agency and temporal experience. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Fraisse, P. (1964). The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  49. Gallagher, S. (2011). Time in action. In C. Callender (Ed.), (pp. 493–515).Google Scholar
  50. Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gallese, V., & Guerra, M. (forthcoming). The empathic screen. Cinema and neuroscience. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Gallotti, M., Fairhurst, M.T., & Frith, C.D. (2017). Alignment in social interactions. Consciousness and Cognition, 48, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Genette, G. (1972). Figures III. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  54. Germeys, F., & D’Ydewalle, G. (2007). The psychology of film: Perceiving beyond the cut. Psychological Research, 71, 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Guyau, J.-M. (1890). La genèse de l’idée de temps. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
  56. Hammond, C. (2012). Time warped: Unlocking the mysteries of time perception. Toronto: Anansi Press.Google Scholar
  57. Jones, M.R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96, 459–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Keightley, E. (Ed.). (2012). Time, media and modernity. Houndmills/New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  59. Klein, S. (2007). The secret pulse of time. Making sense of life’s scarcest commodity. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  60. Koch, S. C., Fuchs, T., Summa, M., & Müller, C. (2012). Body memory, metaphor, and movement. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Laroche, J., Berardi, A.M., & Brangier, E. (2014). Embodiment of intersubjective time: Relational dynamics as attractors in the temporal coordination of interpersonal behaviors and experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Liverence, B. M., & Scholl, B. J. (2012). Discrete events as units of perceived time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 549–554.Google Scholar
  63. Loftus, E.F., Schooler, J.W., Boone, S.M., & Kline, D. (1987). Time went by so slowly: Overestimation of event duration by males and females. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Magliano, J.P., & Zacks, J.M. (2011). The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation. Cognitive Science, 8, 1489–1517.Google Scholar
  65. Manoudi, E. (2015). Investigation of the effects of editing techniques for time manipulation and continuity editing rules in time estimation. Master Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Google Scholar
  66. Matthews, W.J., & Meck, W.H. (2014). Time perception: The bad news and the good. WIREs Cogn Sci, 5, 429–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. McGowan, T. (2011). Out of time: Desire in atemporal cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Meck, W.H., & Ivry, R.B. (Eds.). (2016). Time in perception and action. [special issue]. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 1–290.Google Scholar
  69. Merchant, H., & De la Fuente, V. (Eds.). (2014). Neurobiology of interval timing. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  70. Merchant, H., Harrington, D.L., & Meck, W.H. (2013). Neural basis of the perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Neurosciences, 36, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Meyerhoff, H.F., Vanes, L.D., & Huff, M. (2015). Spatiotemporal predictability alters perceived duration of visual events: Memento effect revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 613–622.Google Scholar
  72. Mittel, J. (2015). Complex TV. The poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York/London: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Mölder, B., Arstila, V., & Øhrstrøm, P. (Eds.). (2016). Philosophy and psychology of time. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  74. Mroz, M. (2012). Temporality and film analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Mulvey, L. (2006). Death 24x a second: Stillness and the moving image. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  76. Nather, F.C., & Oliveira Bueno, J.L. (2012). Timing perception in paintings and sculptures of Edgar Degas. KronoScope, 12(1), 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Nather, F.C., Oliveira Bueno, J.L., Bigand, E., & Droit-Volet, S. (2011). Time changes with the embodiment of another’s body posture. PLoS One, 6(5), e19818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Nather, F.C., Alarcon, P., Fernandes, M., & Oliveira Bueno, J.L. (2014). Subjective time perception is affected by different durations of exposure to abstract paintings that represent human movement. Psychology & Neuroscience, 7(3), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Petitmengin, C. (2006). Describing one’s subjective experience in the second person: An interview method for the science of consciousness. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 229–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Phillips, I. (Ed.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of philosophy of temporal experience. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Piaget, J. (1969). The child’s conception of time. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  82. Poulaki, M. (2015). Brain science and film theory. Reassessing the place of cognitive discontinuity in cinema. Projections, 9(1), 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Powell, H. (2012). Stop the clocks! Time and narrative in cinema. London/New York: Tauris.Google Scholar
  84. Radvansky, G.A., & Zacks, J.M. (2014). Event Cognition. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Reisz, K., & Millar, G. (2010). The technique of film editing (2nd ed.). London: Focal Press.Google Scholar
  86. Ricoeur, P. (1984–1988). Time and narrative (Voll. 1–3 (1983–1985)). Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  87. Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2007). Mirrors in the brain. How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: A basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17(12), 757–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Roenneberg, T. (2012). Internal time. Chronotypes, social jet lag, and why you’re so tired. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Schirmer, A., Meck, W.H., & Penney, T.B. (2016). The socio-temporal brain: Connecting people in time. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 760–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shipley, T.F., & Zacks, J.M. (Eds.). (2008). Understanding events from perception to action. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  94. Smith, T.J. (2012). The attentional theory of cinematic continuity. Projections, 6(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Smith, T.J. (2013). Watching you watch movies: Using eye tracking to inform cognitive film theory. In: Shimamura (Ed.), (pp. 165–191).Google Scholar
  96. Smith, M. (2017). Film, art and the third culture. A naturalized aesthetics of film. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Smith, T.J., & Henderson, J.M. (2008). Edit blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  98. Sobchack, V. (1992). The address of the eye. A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Sobchack, V. (2004). The scene of the screen. Envisioning photographic, cinematic, and electronic ‘presence’. In V. Sobchack (Ed.), Carnal thoughts. Embodiment and moving image culture (pp. 135–162). Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  100. Stewart, G. (2007). Framed time. Toward a postfilmic cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sucala, M., et al. (2010). Psychological time: Interval length judgements and subjective passage of time judgements. Current Psychology Letters, 26(2), 2–9.Google Scholar
  102. Terrone, E. (2017). On time in cinema. In I. Phillips (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of temporal experience (pp. 326–338). London/New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Tikka, P., Kaipainen, M. (2014). Phenomenological considerations on time consciousness under neurocinematic search light. In D’Aloia, Eugeni (Eds.), (pp. 127–139).Google Scholar
  104. Tikka, P., & Kaipainen, M. (2015). Embodied protonarratives embedded in systems of contexts. A neurocinematic approach. In M.J. Grabowski (Ed.), Neuroscience and media: New understandings and representations (pp. 76–88). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Trifonova, T. (2007). Imaginary time in contemporary cinema. In T. Trifonova (Ed.), The image in French philosophy (pp. 261–306). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Vatakis, A. et al. (2014). Time to act: New perspectives on embodiment and timing. In A. Vatakis (Ed.), International Conference on Timing and Time Perception, 31 March – 3 April 2014, Corfu, Greece [special issue] Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 126, pp. 16–20).Google Scholar
  107. Vatakis, A., Balcı, F., Di Luca, M., & Correa, Á. (Eds.). (2018). Timing and time perception: Procedures, measures, and applications. Leiden/Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
  108. Vesper, C., & Van Der Wel, R.P. (2013). Are you ready to jump? Predictive mechanisms in interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 48–61.Google Scholar
  109. Vesper, C., Schmitz, L., Safra, L., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination. Cognition, 153, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Vicary, S., Sperling, M., Von Zimmermann, J., Richardson, D.C., & Orgs, G. (2017). Joint action aesthetics. PLoS One, 12(7), e0180101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Wang, L., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Life motion signals lengthen perceived temporal duration. PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. USA, 109, E673–E677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Wearden, J.H. (2005). The wrong tree: Time perception and time experience in the elderly. In J. Duncan, L. Phillips, & P. McLeod (Eds.), Measuring the mind: Speed, age, and control (pp. 137–158). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Wearden, J.H. (2008). The perception of time: Basic research and some potential links to the study of language. Language Learning, 58 (Suppl. 1), 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wearden, J.H. (2015). Passage of time judgments. Consciousness and Cognition, 38, 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Wearden, J.H. (2016). The psychology of time perception. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wearden, J.H., O’Donoghue, A., Ogden, R., & Montgomery, C. (2014). Subjective duration in the laboratory and the world outside. In V. Arstila, D. Lloyd (Eds.), (pp. 294–310).Google Scholar
  117. Wittmann, M., & van Wassenhove, V. (Eds.). (2009). The experience of time: Neural mechanisms and the interplay of emotion, cognition and embodiment [Special Issue]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series B, 364, 1525.Google Scholar
  118. Wittmann, M. (2016). Felt time. The psychology of how we perceive time. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  119. Wittmann, M., van Wassenhove, V., Craig, A.D., & Paulus, M.P. (2010). The neural substrates of subjective time dilatation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 1–9.Google Scholar
  120. Wolf, T., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2018). Joint action coordination in expert-novice pairs: Can experts predict novices’ suboptimal timing? Cognition, 178, 103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zacks, J.M. (2015). Flicker: Your brain on movies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Zacks, J.M., & Magliano, J.P. (2011). Film understanding and cognitive neuroscience. In F. Bacci & D.P. Melcher (Eds.), Art and the senses (pp. 435–454). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruggero Eugeni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefania Balzarotti
    • 2
  • Federica Cavaletti
    • 1
  • Adriano D’Aloia
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Communication and Performing ArtsUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychlogyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly
  3. 3.Department of Architecture and Industrial DesignUniversità degli Studi della Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”CasertaItaly

Personalised recommendations