• Antonino PennisiEmail author
  • Alessandra Falzone
Part of the Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology book series (PEPRPHPS, volume 23)


This volume presents the results of the research PRIN project (Projects of significant national interest) “Perception, performativity, and cognitive sciences”, which has been financed by MIUR (Ministry of Education University and Research) over the three years period 2016–2019 and carried out by a team of academics: Antonino Pennisi (University of Messina – Principal Investigator), Vittorio Gallese (University of Parma), Ruggero Eugeni (Catholic University of the «Sacred Heart» of Milan), Claudio Paolucci (University of Bologna), Pietro Montani (the «Sapienza» University of Rome), Marco Mazzone (University of Catania), Franco Lo Piparo (University of Palermo), Guglielmo Tamburrini (University of Naples «Federico II»). During 2017 Nunzio Allocca has joined the roman unity, while Marco Carapezza joined the unity of Palermo. All the news about the state of research and the scientific initiatives involving our research group are available on the web ( and described in 2/2017 of “Reti Saperi Linguaggi. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences” (Pennisi 2017).


  1. Aizawa, K. (2014). The enactivist revolution. Avant, 5(2), 1–24.Google Scholar
  2. Calvo, P., & Keijzer F. (2009). Cognition in plants. In F. Baluska (Ed.), Plant-environment interactions: From sensory plant biology to active plant behavior (pp. 247–266), Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Paolo, E., Rohde, M., & De Jaegher, H. (2010). Horizons for the enactive mind: Values, social interaction, and play. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions rethinking the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001). On the status and explanatory structure of developmental systems theory. In P.E. Griffiths, & R.D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 283–298). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hirstein, W. (2015). Consciousness despite network underconnectivity in autism: Another case of consciousness without prefrontal activity? In R.J. Gennaro (Ed.), Disturbed consciousness: New essays on psychopathology and theories of consciousness (pp. 249–264), Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalising enactivism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pennisi, A. (2016). Prospettive evoluzioniste nell’embodied cognition: il cervello “inquilino” del corpo. Reti, saperi, linguaggi. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences, 1/2016, 179–202.Google Scholar
  10. Pennisi, G. (2017). What space for performativity in Cognitive Science? Insights from CODISCO 2017. Reti, saperi, linguaggi. Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences, 2/2017, 381–86.Google Scholar
  11. Pennisi, A., & Falzone, A. (2016). Darwinian biolinguistics. Theory and history of naturalistic philosophy on language. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Shapiro, L. (2014). Book review: Radicalizing Enactivism: Basic minds without content. Mind, 123(489), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stewart, J. (2010). Foundational issues in enaction as a paradigm for cognitive science: From the origin of life to consciousness and writing. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne, & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science (pp. 1–31). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive ScienceUniversity of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations