Increasing Efficiency of Vibratory Rollers Through Adjusting Magnitude of Disturbing Force

  • Y. G. PopovEmail author
  • E. K. Chabutkin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


While compacting various road construction materials, the efficiency of the process depends largely on the correct choice of the roller both in terms of weight and design features and the purpose of its operating modes. To improve the efficiency of the vibrating roller, it is necessary to adjust the amount of contact stresses under the roll as the density of the material increases. This significantly reduces the total number of roller passes required to achieve the required compaction factor (ratio). At the same time, the wrong selection of the roller operating mode leads to an increase in compaction time, a decrease in the efficiency and quality of compaction of road construction materials. The paper gives recommendations to adjust the magnitude of the disturbing force of the vibration exciter in the process of the roller operation. At the same time, it is possible to choose the modes of their operation, in particular, the rational speed of rolling.


Roller Compaction Vibration exciter Disturbing force Rational speed Compaction ratio Operating mode 


  1. 1.
    Chabutkin EK, Tarasova NE (2017) Recommendations on the choice of road rollers and the purpose of modes of operation under the conditions of construction. Roads Bridges 37(1):69–80Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Forssblad L, Cessler S (1977) Vibratory asphalt compaction. “Dynapac”, 89 pGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wehrli C, Anderegg R (1998) Nonlinear oscillations at compacting machines. Geotechnik, Verlag Glückauf GmbH, Essen:16–25Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cat Compaction in Europe (2005) Contract J 3:48–54Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hay J (1980) Vibroller with rubber covered roller. Softholed roller plays down posses. Contract J 5261(23):296 pGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Briaud J-L, Seo J (2003) Intelligent compaction: overview and research needs. Texas A&M University, 79 pGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noshe K (2002) Development of a new type of single drum vibratory roller. In: Proceedings of 14th international conference of the international society for terrain-vehicle systems, Vicksburg, MS USA, 20–24 Oct 2002Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang J, Xue GH, Liu D (2011) Development of the new vibration exciter. Adv Mater Res 106:211–212Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chabutkin EK (2017) Application of vibrating rollers for compaction of road construction materials. Publishing House YAGTU, Yaroslavl, p 200Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chabutkin EK, Tyuremnov IS, Popov YG, Prusov AY (2011) The software package “Vibkat”. Patent software product 2011615193, opub. 01.07.2011Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kostelyov MP (2004) Possibilities and efficiency of vibrating rollers for compaction of soils of various types and conditions. Road Mach 2:22–24Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kostelyov MP (2008) Again about the quality and efficiency of compaction of various soils with modern vibro-rollers. Road Mach 1:40–47Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderegg R, Kaufmann K (2004) Intelligent compaction with vibratory rollers. Transp Res Board, 124–134Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Serridge CJ, Synac O (2007) Ground improvement solutions for motorway widening schemes and new highway embankment construction over soft ground. Ground Improv J 11(4):219–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harhuta NI (1973) Machines for soil compaction. Moskov-Leningrad. Mechanical Engineering, 176 pGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bulychev VG (1974) Mechanics of dispersed soils. Stroyizdat, Moscow, p 227Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Floss R, Gruber N, Obermayer JA (1983) Dynamical test method for continuous compaction control. In: Rathmayer HG, Saari K (eds) Proceedings 8th European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering May, Helsinki, pp 25–30Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kopf F, Erdmann P (2005) Numerische Untersuchunsen der Flachendecker Dynamischer Verdichtungskontrolle. Osterreichische Ingenieus-und Architekten-Zeitschrift (OIAZ) 150(4–5):126–143Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mooney MA, Rinehart RV (2009) In-Situ soil response to vibratory loading and its relationship to roller-measured soil stiffness. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 135(8):1022–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tyuremnov IS (2016) The review of the continuous compaction control system for soil compaction by vibratory rollers. Part 3. Functional features and “Intelligent Compaction”. Bull Pac Nat Univ 2(41):115–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yaroslavl State Technical UniversityYaroslavlRussia

Personalised recommendations