Advertisement

Design and Calculation Method of Composite Housings for New Generation Magnetorheological Devices

  • K. V. NaigertEmail author
  • V. A. Tselischev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

By designing of special purpose drive systems, the construction materials must possess the functional properties, for example, transmission of magnetic and electromagnetic radiation or magnetic shielding being important properties. The control of characteristics in the magnetorheological (MR) systems occurs due to exposure to external electromagnetic fields on the working environment. It is obvious that in the MR drive systems, structural elements for installing of electromagnetic control units must have transmission properties of electromagnetic waves and metal is not applicable to these structural elements. Using of polymer composites is a promising solution to the problem. Particularly, high strength properties have fiber polymer composites, which are able to withstand mechanical stress that exceeds allowable stresses for preserving integrity of steel elements. The fiber polymer composites can withstand the high tensile and compressive stresses, but it is only by stresses, which are attached in axial direction of composite fiber, and the ability to resist loading in the radial or tangential direction significantly concedes to values of allowable axial stresses. MR devices by exploitation under multi-directional dynamic loads need the use of composite materials with more isotropic material properties (strength properties). In the research, this problem was solved and the authors made a new fiber polymer composite material, which has significantly less anisotropy in strength properties. The calculation method of strength properties of this new fiber polymer composite material is proposed.

Keywords

Fiber polymer composites Magnetorheological devices Strength properties 

References

  1. 1.
    Burchenkov VN et al (2000) Magnitozhidkostnoye ustroystvo dlya gasheniya kolebaniy (MR device for vibration damping). RU patent 2,145,394, 10 Feb 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Korchagin AB et al (2012) Reguliruyemyy magnitoreologicheskiy pnevmaticheskiy amortizator (Adjustable magnetorheological pneumatic damper). RU patent 2,449,188, 27 Apr 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gusev EP, Plotnikov AM, Voevodov SYu (2003) Magnitoreologicheskiy amortizator (MR shock absorber). RU patent 2,232,316, 27 Oct 2003Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kudryakov YuB et al (1998) Magnitoreologicheskiy vibrogasitel’ (MR vibration damper). RU patent 2,106,551, 10 Mar 1998Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamanin IA et al (2009) Dinamicheskiy gasitel’ (Dynamic absorber). RU patent 2,354,867, 10 May 2009Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gordeev BA et al (2015) Magnitoreologicheskiy amortizator (MR damper). RU patent 2,561,610, 27 Aug 2015Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Harris CE et al (2002) Emerging materials for revolutionary aerospace vehicle structures and propulsion systems. SAMPE J 38(6):33–43Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strong AB (2006) Plastics: materials and processing, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warren CD (2001) Carbon fiber in future vehicles. SAMPE J 37(2)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Driver D (2000) Towards 2000—the composite engine. In: Meeting of Australian Aeronautical SocietyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dubois D, Fargier H (2014) Capacity refinements and their application to qualitative decision evaluation. ftp://ftp.irit.fr/IRIT/ADRIA/PapersFargier/dubois-fargier-xkru09.pdf. Accessed 28 Nov 2018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Naigert KV, Tutynin VT (2018) Kompozitnyy korpus dlya magnitoreologicheskogo dempfera (Composite housing for magnetorheological damper). RU patent application 2018,130,967, the decision to grant a patent 6 Nov 2018Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Beer F et al (2009) Mechanics of materials. McGraw-Hill Companies, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harmsen SC, Rogers AM (1986) Inferences about the local stress field from focal mechanisms: applications to earthquakes in the southern Great Basin of Nevada. Bull Seism Soc Am 76:1560–1572Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grabisch M (2004) The Moebius transform on symmetric ordered structures and its application to capacities on finite sets. Discrete Math 287:17–34MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Landau LD, Lifshits EM (1986) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. Heinemann, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dudarev SL, Ma PW (2018) Elastic fields, dipole tensors, and interaction between self-interstitial atom defects in bcc transition metals. Phys Rev Mater 2:033602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dederichs PH, Schroeder K (1978) Anisotropic diffusion in stress fields. Phys Rev B 17:2524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skvortsov YuV (2013) Mekhanika kompozitsionnykh materialov. In: Mechanics of composite materials, SamaraGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alexandrov S (2018) Elastic/plastic disks under plane stress conditions. Springer, New York, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.South Ural State UniversityChelyabinskRussia
  2. 2.Ufa State Aviation Technical UniversityUfaRussia

Personalised recommendations