Losses Analysis in Gas Turbine Engines Flow Parts

  • I. A. Krivosheev
  • N. B. SimonovEmail author
  • K. E. Rozhkov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)


The methods of loss in the flow parts of power plants (PP) of aircraft, gas-pumping units (GPU), gas turbine engines (GTE), and gas turbine plants (GTP) accounting are considered. A new method for approximating gas-dynamic characteristics and calculating the efficiency coefficients of the units including compressors and turbines optimizing their geometry and modes is proposed. To verify the method, the results of factory tests, 2D and 3D CAD/CAE-simulation of the flow and gas-dynamic characteristics of the flow part components, including blowing of the blade profile gratings were used. It is shown that this method can be effectively used to optimize the flow parts geometry and to select the modes of operation of input and output devices, blade rims as part of compressors and turbines, and transitional ducts between cascades. It is suggested to use the method to control the change in the characteristics of the GTE units during operation. This can significantly improve the accuracy of parametric diagnostic GTP and GTD. The proposed method can be used to monitor the state of aggregates and systems in the power engineering, in transport, and in other areas.


Flow Compressor Turbomachinery Turbine Characteristics Losses Efficiency Parameters Modes Diagnostics Simulation 


  1. 1.
    Johnson IA (1965) Aerodynamic design of axial-flow compressors. NASA. Revised. Scientific and Technical Information DivisionGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horlock JH (1973) Axial compressors. Butterworth, reprinted with supplementary material, Krieger Publishing Co. IncGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Howell AR (1945) Fluid dynamics of axial compressors, proceedings. Inst Mech Eng 153:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore RD, Reid L (1980) Performance of single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, respectively and with design pressure ratio of 2,05. NACAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koch CC, Smith LH (1976) Loss sources and magnitudes in axial-flow compressors. Trans ASME J Eng for Power 98A(3):411–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lieblein S (1960) Incidence and deviation-angle correlations for compressor cascades. J Basic Eng, Trans ASME, D 82:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lieblein S (1959) Loss and stall analysis of compressor cascades. J Basic Eng, Trans ASME, Ser D 81:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lieblein S, Roudebush WH (1965) Theoretical loss relations for low-speed two-dimensional-cascade flow, NACAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schobeiri MT (1997) Advanced compressor loss correlations. Int J Rotat Mach 3(3):163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serovy GK (1981) Axial-flow turbomachine through-flow calculation methods through flow calculations in axial turbomachines, AGARD-AR-175Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Falck N (2008) Axial flow compressor mean line design, s.l.: Division of Thermal Power Department of Energy Sciences Lund University, Master ThesisGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Veres JP (2009) Axial and centrifugal compressor mean line flow analysis method, NASAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuprik VV, Balaban YuN, Hoteenkov IA (2016) Method of assessing the technical condition of the gas turbine engine (A method for assessing the technical state of a gas turbine engine). Gas Turbine Technologies, pp 32–34Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chichkov BA (2005) Modeli i parametricheskaya diagnostika aviatsionnykh dvigateley (Models and parametric diagnostics of aircraft engines). MSTU, MoskowGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eliseev YS, Krymov V, Malinovsky KA, Popov VG (2002) Tekhnologiya ekspluatatsii, diagnostiki i remonta gazoturbinnykh dvigateley (Technology of operation, diagnostics and repair of gas turbine engines). Higher School, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lozitsky LP (1982) Evaluation of the technical condition of aviation GTE (Estimation of technical condition of aviation GTE). Transport, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stepanenko VL (1985) Prakticheskaya diagnostika aviatsionnykh gazoturbinnykh dvigateley (Practical diagnostics of aviation gas turbine engines) Transport, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheremetev AV (2003) Analiz opyta ekspluatatsii zarubezhnykh gazoturbinnykh dvigateley po tekhnicheskomu sostoyaniyu (Analysis of operational experience of foreign gas turbine engines according to the technical state). Aviat Space Technol Technol 40(5):5–9Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kurochkin VN, Nazarenko SA, Shcherbak NA (2015) Vliyaniye tekhnicheskogo obsluzhivaniya i remontov na resurs oborudovaniya dlya pererabotki maslichnykh kul’tur (Influence of technical maintenance and repairs on the resource of equipment for processing oil-bearing crops). Prog Mod Sci Educ 3:83–91Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tarasenko AV, Kondratiev YuV (2016) Otsenka tekhnicheskogo sostoyaniya ustroystv kompensatsii reaktivnoy moshchnosti v tyagovoy seti (Evaluation of the technical condition of reactive power compensation devices in a traction network). Prog Mod Sci Educ 10(5):155–157Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. A. Krivosheev
    • 1
  • N. B. Simonov
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. E. Rozhkov
    • 1
  1. 1.Ufa State Aviation Technical UniversityUfaRussia

Personalised recommendations