Advertisement

Vibration Isolating and Impact Protecting Systems with Quasi-Zero Stiffness Providing Wide Operating Area

  • A. ZotovEmail author
  • A. Valeev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

This study presents systems with quasi-zero stiffness. The interest in these systems has been constantly increasing recently. In most of the systems with quasi-zero stiffness, the force characteristic with quasi-zero stiffness is obtained due to the combination of systems with negative and systems with positive stiffness. Generally, the length of the working sections of such systems is small and less than few centimeters. The well-known systems with quasi-zero stiffness are observed, main advantages and disadvantages are discussed, and a new classification is presented. Also, this study demonstrated how to upgrade a pneumatic spring into a system with quasi-zero stiffness for increasing their vibration isolating and impact protection properties. For modifying force characteristics of standard pneumatic spring, it is offered to use a pack of Belleville springs. The advantage of such a pneumatic spring with quasi-zero stiffness is the absence of the necessity of its major modifications. Analytical calculations are made for proving such an idea.

Keywords

Quasi-zero stiffness Vibration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The reported study was funded by The Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation according to the research project MK-2965.2018.8.

References

  1. 1.
    Alabuzhev PA, Gritchin L, Kim L, Migirenko G, Chon V, Stepanov P (1989) Vibration protecting and measuring systems with quasi-zero stiffness. Hemisphere Publishing, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carrella A (2008) Passive vibration isolators with high-static-low-dynamic-stiffness. Ph.D. thesis, University of Southampton, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carrella A, Friswell MI (2008) A passive vibration isolator incorporating a composite bistable plate. In: Proceedings of 6th European nonlinear dynamics conference, Saint Petersburg (Russia), 30 June-4 July 2008Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carrella A, Brennan M, Waters TP (2007) Static analysis for a passive vibration isolator with quasi-zero stiffness characteristic. J Sound Vib 301(3–5):678–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carrella A, Brennan M, Waters TP (2007) Optimization of a quasi-zero-stiffness isolator. J Mech Sci Technol 21:946–949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sun X, Xu J, Jing X, Cheng L (2014) Beneficial performance of a quasi-zero-stiffness vibration isolator with time-delayed active control. Int J Mech Sci 82:32–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valeev AR, Zotov AN, Kharisov S (2015) Designing of compact low frequency vibration isolator with quasi-zero stiffness. J Low Freq Noise, Vib Act Control 34(4):459–474 (Multi-Science Publishing Company Ltd.)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valeev AR (2017) Numerical and experimental analysis of metamaterials with quasi-zero effect for vibration isolation. AIP Conf Proc 1859:020061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valeev AR (2017) Vibration isolating metamaterial with arc-structure. IOP conference proceedings 225:012142Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Correa DM, Seepersad CC, Haberman MR (2015) Mechanical design of negative stiffness honeycomb materials. Integr Mater Manuf Innov 4:10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Correa DM, Klatt TD, Cortes SA, Haberman MR, Kovar D, Seepersad CC (2015) Negative stiffness honeycombs for recoverable shock isolation. Rapid Prototyp JGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang Z, Zhang Q, Zhang K, Hu G (2016) Tunable digital metamaterial for broadband vibration isolation at low frequency. Adv MaterGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Choi SB, Han YM (2007) Vibration control of electrorheological seat suspension with human-body model using sliding mode control. J Sound Vib 303:391–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choi SB, Nam MH, Lee BK (2000) Vibration control of a MR seat damper for commercial vehicles. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 11:936–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gan Z, Hillis AJ, Darling J (2015) Adaptive control of an active seat for occupant vibration reduction. J Sound Vib 349:39–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kawana M, Shimogo T (1998) Active suspension of truck seat. Shock Vib 5:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robertson W, Wood R, Cazzolato B, Zander A (2006) Zero-stiffness magnetic springs for active vibration isolation. In: Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on active noise and vibration control, Cairns (Australia), 9–12 July 2007Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ning D, Sun S, Zhang J, Du H, Li W, Wang X (2016) An active seat suspension design for vibration control of heavy-duty vehicles. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 4(35):264–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zheng Y, Zhang X, Luo Y, Yan B, Ma C (2016) Design and experiment of a high-static–low-dynamic stiffness isolator using a negative stiffness magnetic spring. J Sound Vib 360:31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gohari M, Tahmasebi M (2014) Active off-road seat suspension system using intelligent active force control. J Low Freq Noise Vib Act Control 34(4):475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andreeva LE (1981) Elastic elements of devices. Mashinostroenie, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ufa State Petroleum Technological UniversityUfaRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations