Advertisement

Solving Problem of Curved Surface Approximation by Layers with Constant and Variable Sections During Forming by Additive Methods

  • A. N. GrechukhinEmail author
  • V. V. Kuts
  • M. S. Razumov
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The paper considers the accuracy of the formation of engineering products’ surface layers using additive methods. It was determined that in case of additive forming, the accuracy characteristics of the surface layer differ significantly from the accuracy characteristics of the surface layers obtained using traditional methods. This is due to the high values of the error of forming (approximation) in additive methods. To improve the accuracy characteristics of products’ complex surfaces obtained using additive methods, it was proposed to ensure the dynamic spatial orientation of the final element of the additive equipment forming system. To control the spatial orientation of the forming system final element, it was proposed to use mechatronic 5 and 6 coordinate devices. The related area for solving the issues of improving the accuracy of additive forming methods was indicated. This area includes parallel control of the spatial orientation and section dimensions of a single layer, which, at certain values, will form the required value of approximation error at the specified performance. In this regard, the solutions of the problem of the parts’ curved surface approximation by layers with constant and variable sections were proposed. The results of geometric and computer simulation are given. A comparative assessment of the results of solving the above problems is provided. The proposed method will allow reducing the error in forming the products obtained with the help of additive methods.

Keywords

Additive technologies Layer-by-layer synthesis Forming Error 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the grant of the President of the Russian Federation for young scientists MK-6406.2018.8

References

  1. 1.
    Burns M (1993) Automated fabrication: improving productivity in manufacturing. PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p 369Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saprykin AA (2006) Increasing the productivity of the process of selective laser sintering in the manufacture of prototypes. Thesis of candidate of technical Sciences. Tomsk Polytechnic University, Yurga, p 153Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pronikov A, Averyanov OI, Apollo Yu S (1994) Designing of metal-cutting machines and machine tools (Handbook-textbook vol 3), MSTU them NE Bauman: Mechanical Engineering, Moscow, p 444Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kuts VV, Razumov MS, Grechukhin AN, Bychkova NA (2016) Improving the quality of additive methods for forming the surfaces of odd-shaped parts with the application of parallel kinematics mechanisms. Int J Appl Eng Res 11:11832–11835Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chervyakov LM, Bychkova NA, Yeliseyeva NV et al (2016) Transfer of additive technologies: the industry of the Kursk region. ZAO University Book, Kursk, p 168Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grechukhin AN, Kuts VV, Razumov MS (2018) Control of spatial orientation of the nodes of the robot in the process of forming additive products. Bulletin of Voronezh state technical University, pp 122–129Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grechukhin AN, Kuts VV, Razumov MS (2018) Ways to reduce the error of additive methods of forming. MATEC Web Conf.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822601002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grechukhin AN, Kuts VV, Razumov MS (2018) Management of space orientation of the end effector of generation of geometry system five axis manufacturing machinery for additive generation of geometry. MATEC Web Conf.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201822601004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hur J, Lee K (1998) The development of a CAD environment to determine the preferred build-up direction for layered manufacturing. Manuf Technol 14:247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim JY, Lee K, Park JC (1994) Determination of optimal part orientation in stereolithographic rapid prototyping technical report. Department of mechanical design and production engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, pp 356–366Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lan PT, Chou S, Chent Y, Gemmill LD (1997) Determining fabrication orientations for rapid prototyping with stereolithography apparatus. Comput Aided Des 29:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Massod SH, Rattanawong W, Iovenitti P (2003) A generic algorithm for part orientation system for complex parts in rapid prototyping. J Mater Process Technol 139:110–116Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Masood SH, Rattanawong W (2002) A generic part orientation system based on volumetric error in rapid prototyping. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Egorov IN (2010) Position-force control of robotic and mechatronic devices. Vladimir State University, Vladimir, p 243Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lashnev SI, Borisov AN, Emelyanov SG (1997) Geometric theory of surface formation by cutting tools Kursk State Tech. Un-t, Kursk, p 391Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emelyanov SG (2001) Development of the theory methods and means of surface formation by assembled metal-cutting tools on the basis of system modeling of their design process. Thesis of doctor of technical sciences, Moscow, p 407Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuts VV (2012) Methodology of pre-project studies of specialized metal-cutting systems. Thesis of doctor of technical sciences, Kursk, p 366Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kuts VV, Ponomarev VV (2017) Construction of a model for the formation of long shafts with a RK profile of a prefabricated disk milling cutter. Fundamental and applied problems of technology, pp 110–115Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grechishnikov VA, Kuts VV, Razumov MS et al (2017) Determination of the error in the shape of a part shaping by a planetary mechanism using the methods of geometric cutting theory. STIN 4:24–26Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grechishnikov VA, Romanov VB, Pivkin PM (2017) Errors in shaping by a planetary mechanism. Russ Eng Res 37(9):824–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grechukhin AN, Kuts VV, Razumov MS (2018) Experimental determination of the cross-section parameters of a single layer in the additive forming products. News Tula State Univ Tech Sci 10:264–270Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Grechukhin AN, Razumov MS, Kudelina DV et al (2018) Development of information-analytical system for technological requests monitoring, taking into account regional specifics. In: International conference on actual issues of mechanical engineering, vol 157, pp 198–202Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. N. Grechukhin
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. V. Kuts
    • 1
  • M. S. Razumov
    • 1
  1. 1.Southwest State UniversityKurskRussia

Personalised recommendations