Advertisement

Advantages of Using Wheel Rolling Radius for Calculating Friction Characteristics in Wheel-to-Road Contact Patch

  • E. V. BalakinaEmail author
  • E. Y. Lipatov
  • D. S. Sarbayev
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

When improving the design of electronic control devices and car stability control system algorithms based on maximizing the road–tire friction coefficients, one has to evaluate the friction between the elastic wheel and the bearing surface. \(\varphi{-}s_{x}\)-diagrams are simulated to that end. These are the dependencies of the friction coefficients on the wheel sliding. What they look like depends, aside from external conditions (type of coating, lateral forces, etc.), on the law of contact-patch sliding increase, which in its turn depends on multiple factors including the estimated radius of the wheel. As of today, free radius, dynamic radius, and rolling radius values are used to that end. In this case, the difference between them can reach up to 20%, depending on the value of the tire radial deformation. Despite the large number of studies on the theory of rolling wheels, experts still have not developed a consensus on what radius should be used for these purposes, which, naturally, is accompanied by a difference in the calculations in which these radii are used. The researchers prove the advantages of using the estimated kinematic radius and propose a correlation for calculating it. Herein are presented \(\varphi{-}s_{x}\)-diagrams for different radii.

Keywords

Elastic wheel Solid surface Contact patch Free Dynamic and rolling radius Longitudinal wheel sliding Friction in contact Forms \(\varphi{-}s_{x}\)-diagrams 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 19-08-00011.

References

  1. 1.
    Balabin IV, Putin VA, Chabunin IS (2012) Automobile and tractor wheels and tires. MGTU MAMI, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balakina EV (2017) Calculation of the geometric position and the sizes of the static friction and sliding friction zones at the point of contact between an elastic wheel and a firm surface. J Frict Wear Allerton Press Inc N Y 38(2):144–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balakina EV, Kochetkov AV (2017) Friction coefficient of tire with road surface. Mechanical Engineering, Moscow, p 292Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Balakina EV, Zotov NM (2015) Determination of the mutual arrangement of forces, reactions, and friction zones in the contact zone of an elastic wheel with a solid surface. J Frict Wear Allerton Press Inc N Y 36(1):29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Balakina EV, Zotov NM, Fedin AP (2018) Modeling of the motion of automobile elastic wheel in realtime for creation of wheeled vehicles motion control electronic systems. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol 315, p 012004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balakina EV et al (2015) Modeling techniques for tires based on φ−sx diagram. Acta Tech CSAV (Ces Akad Ved) 60(2):173–178Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balakina E et al (2013) Problems of modelling of dynamic processes in real time (on the example of vehicle brake dynamics). Mechanical Engineering, Moscow, p 299Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Emami A et al (2017) Physics-based friction model with potential application in numerical models for tire-road traction. Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, p 6Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fedotov AI (2015) Dynamic method of diagnostics of pneumatic brake drives of motor vehicles. Monograph. Publications IrNITU, Irkutsk, p 514Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khaleghian S et al (2017) A technical survey on tire-road friction estimation. Friction 5(2):123–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khaleghian S, Ghasemalizadeh O, Taheri S (2016) Estimation of the tire contact patch length and normal load using intelligent tires and its application in small ground robot to estimate the tire-road friction. Tire Sci Technol TSTCA 44(4):248–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knoroz VI, Klennikov EV, Petrov IP (eds) (1976) Operation of automobile tires. Transport, Moscow, p 240Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Koskinen S (2010) Sensor data fusion based estimation of tyre-road friction to enhance collision avoidance. A dissertation for the degree of doctor of science in technology of the faculty automation, Mechanical and Materials Engineering, The Tampere University of Technology, 12 Mar 2010, 209 pGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kravets VN, Selifonov VV (2011) Automobile theory. College textbook, OOO Greenlight, Moscow, p 884Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Minca C (2015) The determination and analysis of tire contact surface geometric parameters. Rev Air Force Acad RomIa 1:149–154Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Beer M et al (2012) Tyre—pavement interface contact stresses on flexible pavements—quo vadis? In: 8th Conference on asphalt pavements for Southern Africa, June 2012Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pacejka HB (2012) Tire and vehicle dynamics. Published by Elsevier Ltd., USAGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Petrushov VA (2008) Automobiles and road trains: new technologies of research of rolling and wind resistance. Torus Press, Moscow, p 352Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jazar Reza N (2008) Vehicle dynamics: theory and application. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, London, p 1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomaraee P et al (2015) Relationships among the contact patch length and width, the tire deflection and the rolling resistance of a free-running wheel in a soil bin facility. Span J Agric Res13(2):7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Turenko AN, Lomaka SI, Ryzhikh LA, Leontiev DN (2010) Calculation of realized traction coefficient at wheel floating in braking mode. Automob Transp 27:7–12Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Woodward D et al (2014) The static contact patch of some friction measuring devices. In: 4th International Safer Roads Conference, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, May 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. V. Balakina
    • 1
    Email author
  • E. Y. Lipatov
    • 1
  • D. S. Sarbayev
    • 1
  1. 1.Volgograd State Technical UniversityVolgogradRussia

Personalised recommendations