Mutual Agreement

  • Stephanie WackernagelEmail author
  • Christine Kohlert


Powerful visions for a new world of work can herald sustainable and productivity-enhancing change for companies. After the introduction of a new world of work, however, many companies notice that they had too little courage in implementing their concepts. The expected opportunities have been fulfilled and many fears have not materialised. Often, dissatisfaction with a new office concept dissolves after a short time and opportunities for profound change are simply missed. In regular consulting projects at the Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Engineering (IAO), it can be seen that project processes for the implementation of a new working environment are not determined by the vision of the company management, but by fears.


  1. Altman, I. (1970). Territorial behavior in humans: An analysis of the concepts. In L. A. Pastalan & D. H. Carson (Eds.), Spatial behavior of older people. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  2. BAuA. (2010): Well-being in the office: Occupational health and safety in office work. Available under Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Accessed on 5 October 2017.
  3. Bodin Danielsson, C. (2013). An explorative review of the lean office concept. Journal of Corporate Real Estate Planning Research, 15(3–4), 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodin Danielsson, C., & Bodin, L. (2008). Office type in relation to health, well-being, and job satisfaction among employees. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 636–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brotheridge, C. M., & Lee, R. T. (2003). Development and validation of the emotional labor scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canter, D., & Rees, K. (1982). A multivariate model of housing satisfaction. International Review of Applied Psychology, 31, 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chomistek, A. K., Manson, J. E., Stefanick, M. L., Lu, B., Sands-Lincoln, M., Going, S. B., et al. (2013). Relationship of sedentary behavior and physical activity to incident cardiovascular disease: Results from the women’s health initiative. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 61, 2346–2354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Croon, E. M., Sluiter, J. K., Kuijer, P. P. F. M., & Frings-Dresen, M. H. W. (2005). The effect of office concepts on worker health and performance: A systematic review of the literature. Ergonomics, 48(2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-without-attention effect. Science, 311, 1005–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doppler, K., & Lauterburg, C. (2014). Change management. shaping corporate change (13th ed.) Frankfurt: AUFL/M., New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Fischer, G. N. (1990). Psychology of the workroom. Frankfurt/M.: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Geurts, S. A. E., Taris, T. W., Kompier, M. A. J., Dikkers, J. S. E., van Hooff, M. L. M., & Kinnunen, U. M. (2005). Work-home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work & Stress, 19(4), 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glazinski, B. (2004). Strategic corporate development: identifying and averting crisis signals at an early stage. Wiesbaden: Gabler Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, M. T., Hamilton, D. G., & Zderic, T. W. (2007). The role of low energy expenditure and sitting on obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes, 56, 2655–2667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hertel, G., van der Heijden, B., De Lange, A., & Deller, J. (guest Eds.). (2013). Facilitating age diversity in organisations—Part I: Challenging popular misbeliefs. Special issue of the Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 729–856.Google Scholar
  16. Hielscher, D. R. (2014). The broken windows theory: On the influence of the spatial environment on social behaviour. Berlin: epubli.Google Scholar
  17. Huy, Q. (2002). Emotional balancing: The role of middle managers in radical change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 31–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Seco. (2010). SBiB study: Swiss survey in offices. Accessed on 5 October 2017.
  19. Jahncke, H. (2017, August). Activity-based workplaces: Changes in cognitive performance among worker previously employed at cellular offices or open-plan offices. Article Presented at the International Conference of Environmental Psychology: Theories of Change and Social Innovation in Transitions Towards Sustainability, A Coruña, Spain.Google Scholar
  20. Kavanagh, M. H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2006). The impact of leadership and change management strategy on organizational culture and individual acceptance of change during a merger. British Journal of Management, 17(1), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klinger, C., Curth, S., Müller, C., & Nerdinger, F. W. (2014). Older employees in the innovation process. An explorative interview study. Rostocker Beiträge zur Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie, No. 14. Rostock: University of Rostock, Chair of Economic and Organizational Psychology.Google Scholar
  22. Kotter, J. (2012). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lauer, T. (2014). Change management: fundamentals and success factors (2nd ed.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Landes, M., & Steiner, E. (2014). Psychological effects of change processes. Resistance, emotions, willingness to change and implications for managers. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  25. Larsson, R., & Lubatkin, M. (2001). Achieving acculturation in mergers and acquisitions: An international case study. Human Relations, 54(12), 1573–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Lütke Lanfer, S., & Pauls, N. (2017, February). A systematic literature search on modern office structures and their impact on mental well-being. Article presented at the 63rd Spring Congress 2017 of the Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e. V.: Socio-technical design of digital change—creative, innovative, meaningful, Brugg and Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  28. Melkonian, T. (2005). Top executives reactions to change: the role of justice and exemplarity. International Studies of Management and Organization, 34(4), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Research notes. distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 33/3, 626–637.Google Scholar
  30. Nasar, J. L. (1994). Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative quality of building exteriors. Environment and Behavior, 26, 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Oommen, V. G., Knowles, M., & Zhao, I. (2008). Should health service managers embrace open plan work environments? A review. Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management, 3(2), 37–43.Google Scholar
  32. Owen, N., Bauman, A., & Brown, W. (2009). Too much sitting: A novel and important predictor of chronic disease risk? British Journal of Sports Medicine, 43(2), 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: a multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25, 783–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rief, S. (2017, March). The effect of space on motivation, performance and well-being at work. Article presented at the 39th Uponor Congress 2017, St. Christoph am Arlberg, Austria.Google Scholar
  35. Rief, S., Jurecic, M., Kelter, J., & Stolze, D. (2014). Short report on the study office settings. Accessed on 5 October 2017.
  36. Rouleau, L. (2005). Micro-practices of strategic sensemaking and sensegiving: How middle managers interpret and sell change every day. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 1413–1443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rudow, B. (2014). Healthy work. Psychological stress, work design and work organisation. Berlin/Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  38. Simons, T. L. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Slesina, W. (2001). Evaluation of occupational health circles. In H. Pfaff & W. Slesina (Eds.), Effective workplace health promotion (pp. 75–95). Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
  40. Szebel, A. (2015). Change competence of employees. An empirical study on the differential development of the construct of the individual change competence of employees with special consideration of the influence of dispositional personality factors. Dissertation, University of Cologne.Google Scholar
  41. Saegert, S., & Winkel, G. H. (1990). Environmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 441–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schott, U., & Jöns, I. (2004). Change of attitude in mergers: An integrative model for the effect of information and communication. Mannheimer Beiträge zur Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologie, 2, 53–59.Google Scholar
  44. Schweiger, D., & DeNisi, A. (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 110–135.Google Scholar
  45. Udris, I., Rimann, M., & Thalmann, K. (1994). Maintaining health, producing health: On the function of salutogenetic resources. In B. Bergmann & P. Richter (Ed.), The Theory of Action Regulation. From the practice of a theory (pp. 198–215). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  46. Ulich, E., & Wülser, M. (2015). Health management in companies. In Work psychological perspectives. Six. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  47. Wackernagel, S. (2017, February). How the design of the office work environment influences our well-being. Article presented at the 63rd Spring Congress 2017 of the Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft e. V.: Socio-technical design of digital change—Creative, innovative, meaningful. Brugg and Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  48. Wallmann-Sperlich, B., Bucksch, J., Schneider, S., & Froböse, I. (2014). Sitting as a risk factor: Prevalence and determinants of sitting times at the workplace. Healthcare, 76(8–9), A209.Google Scholar
  49. WHO. (2010). Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
  50. Windlinger, L. (2017, May). Office quality: Construction, operation and users’ view. Article presented at the 2nd Symposium of the Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics: People in Spaces, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
  51. Windlinger, L., & Zäch, N. (2007). Perception of stress and well-being in different office forms. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 61(2), 77–85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MunichGermany
  2. 2.RBSGROUP Part of Drees & SommerMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations