Advertisement

Charges and User Fees

  • Harry KitchenEmail author
  • Melville McMillan
  • Anwar Shah
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter compares local fees/charges with local taxes. It lays out how they should be set and for what services. User fees or charges should be based on usage of a service. They are fair, efficient, and accountable where individual beneficiaries are identified and where non-users can be excluded. Unfortunately, their application seldom meets these criteria and, instead, is often designed to generate revenue. In particular, they should finance water, sewage, wastewater, solid waste, public transit, roads, and so on. Rates should be determined by municipal councils without regulatory restrictions unless, of course, the regulations are necessary to enhance local efficiency and accountability. Revenues should not be used to subsidize other local services. They are fair as long as they are based on benefits received.

References

  1. Althaus, Catherine, and Lindsay M. Tedds. 2016. User Fees in Canada: A Municipal Design and Implementation Guide. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Aquije, Daniela D. 2016. Paying for Stormwater Management. IMFG Perspectives 12. Toronto: Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  3. Arnott, Richard, and John Rowse. 2009. Downtown Parking in Auto City. Regional Science and Urban Economics 39 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Au, Ceri. 2007. The New Science of Parking. Time Magazine, July 9. http://www.transalt.org/newsroom/media/1329. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  5. Bird, Richard M. 1976. Charging for Public Services: A New Look at an Old Idea. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2001. User Charges in Local Government Finance. In The Challenge of Urban Government: Policies and Practices, ed. Mila Freire and Richard Stren, 171–182. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. Bird, Richard, and Enid Slack, eds. 2017. Financing Infrastructure: Who Should Pay? Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bird, Richard M., and Thomas Tsiopoulos. 1997. User Charges for Public Services: Potential and Problems. Canadian Tax Journal 45 (1): 35–37.Google Scholar
  9. Boadway, Robin. 1997. The Role of Second Best Theory in Public Economics. In Trade, Technology and Economics: Essays in Honour of Richard G. Lipsey, ed. B.C. Eaton and R.G. Harris, 3–25. United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Borge, Lars-Erik, and Jorn Rattso. 2003. The Relationship Between Costs and User Charges: The Case of a Norwegian Utility Service. CESifo Working Paper No. 1033, Munich.Google Scholar
  11. Calthrop, Edward, and Stef Proost. 2000. Regulating Urban Parking Space: The Choice Between Meter Fees and Time Restrictions. K.U. Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Applied Economics: Center for Economic Studies—Energy, transport & environment Working Paper 2000–6. https://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/238239.
  12. Campbell, C.W., et al. 2016. Western Kentucky University Stormwater Utility Survey. https://www.wku.edu/engineering/civil/fpm/swusurvey/swusurvey. Accessed 18 July 2018.
  13. Church, Jeffrey, and Roger Ware. 2000. Industrial Organization: A strategy Approach. Boston: Irwin-McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  14. Clayton, Frank. 2014. A New Direction for Funding Growth-Related Water and Wastewater Infrastructure in the Greater Toronto Area and Hamilton. Toronto: Centre for Urban Research and Land Development (CUR), Ryerson University.Google Scholar
  15. Dewees, Don. 2002. Pricing Municipal Services: The Economics of User Fees. Canadian Tax Journal 50 (2): 586–599.Google Scholar
  16. Doolittle, Robyn. 2012. Parking Tax? It’s a Global Trend, February 24. http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/transportation/article/1136436. Accessed 12 Sept 2016.
  17. Dupont, Diane, Steven Renzetti, et al. 2013. Liquid Assets: Assessing Water’s Contribution to Niagara. Niagara Region and Brock University, 80. https://www.niagararegion.ca/living/water/pdf/NR-Liquid-Assets-Paper-2013-FINAL.pdf.
  18. Duranton, Gilles, and Matthew A. Turner. 2011. The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities. American Economic Review 101 (6): 2616–2652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ecofiscal Commission, Canada. 2017. Only the Pipes Should Be Hidden: Best Practices for Pricing and Improving Municipal Water and Wastewater Services. https://ecofiscal.ca/reports/. Accessed 16 July 2018.
  20. Elgie, Stewart, Michelle Brownlee, Sarah Jane O’Neill, and Mercedes Marcano. 2016. Pricing Works: How Pricing of Municipal Services and Infrastructure Can Lead to Healthier and More Efficient Cities. Green Prosperity Papers, Metcalf Foundation. http://metcalffoundation.com/stories/publications/pricing-works/. Accessed 20 July 2018.
  21. Environment Canada, Ottawa. 2011. Municipal Water Pricing Report. Ottawa.Google Scholar
  22. Faruqui, Ahmad, and Stephen S. George. 2005. Preventing Electrical Shocks. In Commentary. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
  23. Fenn, Michael, and Harry Kitchen. 2016. Bringing Sustainability to Ontario’s Water Systems: A Quarter-Century of Progress, with Much Left to Do. A Study for the Ontario Sewer and Watermain Construction Association. www.OSWCA.org.
  24. Greentown Sustainable Land Use Group. 2009. The New Science of Parking. Parking Management Strategies for Los Altos. August 4. http://greentownlosaltos.org/wp-content/uploads/GreenTown_Parking_Management_Strategies_WP.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018.
  25. Grush, Bern. 2012. Parking Policy Can Boost Modality Choice. http://grushhour.blogspot.ca/2012/06/parking-policy-can-boost-modality.html. Accessed 5 July 2018.
  26. ———. 2013. Reduce, Rethink, Reform. Thinking Cities, 132–137. http://paybysky.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Reduce-Rethink-Reform-from-Thinking-Cities.pdf. Accessed 15 Aug 2018.
  27. Johns, Carolyn M. 2018. Green Infrastructure and Stormwater Management in Toronto Policy Context and Instruments. Toronto: Centre for Urban Research and Development, Ryerson University.Google Scholar
  28. Kelleher, Maria, Janet Robins, and John Dixie. 2005. Taking Out the Trash: How To Allocate the Costs Fairly. In Commentary. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Kitchen, Harry. 2006. Local Government Enterprises. In Perspectives on Fiscal Federalism, ed. Richard M. Bird and Francois Vaillancourt, 141–174. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute.Google Scholar
  30. ———. 2015. No Seniors’ Specials: Financing Municipal Services in Aging Communities. Institute for Research on Public Policy (IRPP), Montreal, No. 51. www.irpp.org/research/faces-of-aging/. Accessed 5 Aug 2018.
  31. ———. 2017a. Paying for Water in Ontario’s Cities: Past, Present, and Future. IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance Series, University of Toronto, November. http://munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/resources/.
  32. ———. 2017b. Paying for Water in Ontario Cities: Where Have We Come From And Where Do We Go? Chap. 3 in Financing Infrastructure: Who Should Pay?, ed. Richard M. Bird and Enid Slack, 53–86. McGill-Queens University Press. Published for the Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance at the Munk School of Global Affairs.Google Scholar
  33. Kitchen, Harry, and Robin Lindsey. 2013. Financing Roads and Public Transit in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario. www.rccao.com.
  34. Kitchen, Harry, and Enid Slack. 2016. More Tax Sources for Canada’s Largest Cities: Why, What, and How? IMFG Papers on Municipal Finance and Governance Series, No. 27, University of Toronto. http://munkschool.utoronto.ca/imfg/resources/.
  35. Kitchen, Harry, and Almos Tassonyi. 2012. Municipal Taxes and User Fees. Chap. 9 in Tax Policy in Canada, ed. Heather Kerr, Ken McKenzie, and Jack Mintz. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation.Google Scholar
  36. Lindsey, Robin. 2019. User Fees for Transportation: Road Tolls and Congestion Pricing. In Funding the Canadian City, ed. Enid Slack, Lisa Philipps, Lindsay M. Tedds, and Heather L. Evans, 123–153. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation and Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.Google Scholar
  37. Matinez-Vazquez, Jorge, and Jameson Boex. 2001. Russia’s Transition to a New Federalism. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates. 2006. City of Pasadena. Traffic Reduction Strategies Study. http://ww2.cityofpasadena.net/councilagendas/2007%20agendas/Feb_26_07/Pasadena%20Traffic%20Reduction%20Strategies%2011-20-06%20DRAFT.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2018.
  39. OECD. 2010. Pricing Water Resources and Water and Sanitation Services. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. OECD Territorial Reviews. 2009. Toronto Canada, Preliminary Version. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.Google Scholar
  41. Parry, Ian W.H., and Kenneth Small. 2009. Should Urban Transit Subsidies Be Reduced? American Economic Review 99 (3): 700–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Renzetti, Steven. 1999. Municipal Water Supply and Sewage Treatment: Costs, Prices and Distortions. Canadian Journal of Economics 32 (3): 688–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 2009. Wave of the Future: The Case for Smarter Water Policy. In Commentary. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute.Google Scholar
  44. Renzetti, Steven, and Joseph Kushner. 2001. “The Under Pricing of Water Supply and Sewage Treatment” Mimeograph. St. Catharines: Economics Department, Brock University.Google Scholar
  45. Shoup, Donald C. 2006. Cruising for Parking. Transport Policy 13: 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. ———. 2007. Cruising for Parking. Access 30 (Spring), 6–22. http://shoup.bol.ucla.edu/CruisingForParkingAccess.pdf.
  47. Small, Kenneth A., Clifford Winston, and Jia Yan. 2006. Differentiated Road Pricing, Express Lanes, and Carpools: Exploiting Heterogeneous Preferences in Policy Design. Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs, 53–96.Google Scholar
  48. Swain, Harry, Fred Lazar, and Jim Pine. 2005. Watertight: The Case for Change in Ontario’s Water and Wastewater Sector. Report of the Water Strategy Expert Panel, Queen’s Printer for Ontario (Toronto), 96. http://www.probeinternational.org/EVfiles/Watertight-panel_report_EN.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2006.
  49. Szalai, Akos. 2001. New Models of Privatizing Public Utilities: Highlights of Reform in Post-Soviet Countries. In Local Government Brief: The Quarterly Journal of Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative, 18–24. Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  50. Tedds, Lindsay. 2019. Non-Tax Revenue for Funding Municipal Governments: User Fees—Adoptions, Constraints, and Emerging Opportunities. In Funding the Canadian City, ed. Enid Slack, Lisa Philipps, Lindsay M. Tedds, and Heather L. Evans, 97–121. Toronto: Canadian Tax Foundation and Institute on Municipal Finance and Governance.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  2. 2.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  3. 3.Governance StudiesBrookings InstitutionWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations