Specifics of 3D-Printed Electronics

  • G. Gorokhov
  • M. Katsemba
  • A. Liubimau
  • A. LobkoEmail author
  • A. Melnikau
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 227)


3D printing of electronics is very prospective technology, so it has strong demand for the research and application. Nowadays 3D printing can be applied from rapid prototyping using simple and inexpensive table-top commercially available 3D printers to the low-cost 3D fabrication of functional electronic circuits combining printed and mounted components. Implementation of the 3D printing technologies to electronics depends on a material printability, its electric properties and mechanical stability. Extensive research devoted to the development of the printable materials with new functionality, e.g. nanocomposites. Nanocomposites based on polymer binders filled with structured carbon nano-objects showed, for example, good prospects as electromagnetic screens in microwave and infrared spectral regions. 3D printing technology can produce from these materials complicated supports and housings of various shapes providing charge transfer and electromagnetic shielding. Development of 3D structures made of conductive polymers requires exact modeling of their electric and electromagnetic properties. In this article we describe 3D printing technology with thermoplastics including carbon nanocomposites and share an example of 3D conductive lattice modeling.



This research was partially funded by H2020 RISE project 734164 Graphene 3D. We are thankful to Alesia Paddubskaya and Polina Kuzhir, Institute for Nuclear Problems of Belarusian State University, for valuable discussions.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    J.R. Jian et al., AIP Adv. 7, 035314 (2017)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S.W. Kwok et al., Appl. Mater. Today 9, 167–175 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Kyovtorov et al., Int. J. Electron. Commun. (AEÜ) 73, 119–128 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu Sung-Yueh et al., Microsyst. Nanoeng. 1, 15013 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    All 10 types of 3D printing technology in 2018 [electronic resource]/All3DP. Mode of access: Accessed 20 Nov 2018
  7. 7.
    Layer thickness : precision of 3D printing [electronic resource]. Mode of access: Accessed 21 Nov 2018
  8. 8.
    Xin Wang et al., Compos. B 110, 442–458 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Kirkpatrick, Rev. Mod. Phys. 45, 574 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Postiglione, G. Natale, G. Griffini, M. Levi, S. Turri, Compos. A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 76, 110 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Bauhofer, J.Z. Kovacs, Compos. Sci. Technol. 69, 1486 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.R. Potts, D.R. Dreyer, C.W. Bielawski, R.S. Ruoff, Polymer 52, 5 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Y. Hakobyan, K.D. Papoulia, M.D. Grigoriu, Phys. Rev. B 76, 144205 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    N. Athanasopoulos, V. Kostopoulos, Compos. Sci. Technol. 72, 1273 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    A.V. Melnikov, M. Shuba, P. Lambin, Phys. Rev. E 97, 043307 (2018)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Othman, A.R. Abdullah, Intl. J. Comp. Math. 76, 203 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Gorokhov
    • 1
  • M. Katsemba
    • 1
  • A. Liubimau
    • 2
  • A. Lobko
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Melnikau
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Nuclear Problems, Belarusian State UniversityMinskBelarus
  2. 2.Belarusian State Technological UniversityMinskBelarus

Personalised recommendations