Mind and Matter
In physics it is well-known that finding the right question is often at least 50% of the difficulty. This paper does not propose a solution to the problem of consciousness, not even a tentative one. Rather it examines the question. This is in the belief that the question is currently mis-posed. The current conception of consciousness may be regarded as an attenuated version of the Cartesian concept of mind. It is argued that the Cartesian philosophy was originally motivated by conceptual problems with Galilean physics. Quantum mechanics changes things. This is not to say that the problem of consciousness is a pseudo-problem, as is sometimes suggested. It is, however, to say that the problem is not quite as is often assumed. In particular, it is argued that current conceptions encourage an unbalanced conception of mentality, according to which the state of being barely awake is the essence of what it is to be human, whereas the thought processes which led Einstein to the general theory of relativity are something a zombie could manage.
- Appleby, D. M. (2014). Mind and matter: A critique of Cartesian thinking. In H. Atmanspacher & C. A. Fuchs (Eds.), The Pauli-Jung conjecture and its impact today (pp. 7–36). Imprint Academic. arXiv:1305.7381.
- Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Burtt, E. A. (1954). The metaphysical foundations of modern science (2nd ed.). Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
- Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
- Descartes, R. (1982). Principles of philosophy (V. R. Miller & R. P. Miller, Trans. and Edited). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
- Descartes, R. (1984). The philosophical writings of descartes (Vol. 2) (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Descartes, R. (1991). The philosophical writings of descartes (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Translated J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, & A. Kenny.Google Scholar
- Descartes, R. (2004). The world and other writings (S. Gaukroger, Trans. and edited.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Einstein, A. (1970). Reply to criticisms. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist (The library of living philosophers, Vol. VII, 3rd ed.). La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, C. A. (2016) Participatory realism. arXiv:1601.04360.
- Fuchs, C. A. (2017). Notwithstanding Bohr, the reasons for QBism. Mind and Matter, 15, 245–300.Google Scholar
- Fuchs, C. A., & Stacey, B. C. (2016) QBist quantum mechanics: Quantum theory as a hero’s handbook. arXiv:1612.07308.
- Galilei, G. (2008). The essential Galileo (M. A. Finocchiaro, Edited and Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
- Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., & Sutton, J. (Eds.). (2000). Descartes’ natural philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hardcastle, V. G. (1997). The why of consciousness: A non-issue for materialists. In J. Shear (Ed.), Explaining consciousness—the ‘Hard Problem’. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Huxley, T. (1866). Lessons on elementary physiology. New York: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. S. (1978). Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity: 1884–1912. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Leibniz, G. W., & Strickland, L. (2014). Leibniz’s monadology: A new translation and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., & Wallace, D. (Eds.). (2010). Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Shea, W. R. (1991). The magic of numbers and motion: The scientific career of René Descartes. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
- Taylor, C. C. W. (1999). The atomists Leucippus and Democritus: Fragments, a text and translation with a commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar