Advertisement

Mind and Matter

  • Marcus ApplebyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 414)

Abstract

In physics it is well-known that finding the right question is often at least 50% of the difficulty. This paper does not propose a solution to the problem of consciousness, not even a tentative one. Rather it examines the question. This is in the belief that the question is currently mis-posed. The current conception of consciousness may be regarded as an attenuated version of the Cartesian concept of mind. It is argued that the Cartesian philosophy was originally motivated by conceptual problems with Galilean physics. Quantum mechanics changes things. This is not to say that the problem of consciousness is a pseudo-problem, as is sometimes suggested. It is, however, to say that the problem is not quite as is often assumed. In particular, it is argued that current conceptions encourage an unbalanced conception of mentality, according to which the state of being barely awake is the essence of what it is to be human, whereas the thought processes which led Einstein to the general theory of relativity are something a zombie could manage.

References

  1. Appleby, D. M. (2014). Mind and matter: A critique of Cartesian thinking. In H. Atmanspacher & C. A. Fuchs (Eds.), The Pauli-Jung conjecture and its impact today (pp. 7–36). Imprint Academic. arXiv:1305.7381.
  2. Banks, E. C. (2003). Ernst Mach’s world elements: A study in natural philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Burtt, E. A. (1954). The metaphysical foundations of modern science (2nd ed.). Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind: In search of a fundamental theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. New York: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
  7. Descartes, R. (1982). Principles of philosophy (V. R. Miller & R. P. Miller, Trans. and Edited). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  8. Descartes, R. (1984). The philosophical writings of descartes (Vol. 2) (J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, & D. Murdoch, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Descartes, R. (1991). The philosophical writings of descartes (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Translated J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, D. Murdoch, & A. Kenny.Google Scholar
  10. Descartes, R. (2004). The world and other writings (S. Gaukroger, Trans. and edited.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Einstein, A. (1905). Über die von der molekularkinetischen theorie der wärme geforderte bewegung von in ruhenden flüssigkeiten suspendierten teilchen. Annalen der Physik, 322, 549–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Einstein, A. (1905). Über einen die erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuristischen gesichtspunkt. Annalen der Physik, 322, 132–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Einstein, A. (1934). On the method of theoretical physics. Philosophy of Science, 1, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Einstein, A. (1970). Reply to criticisms. In P. A. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist (The library of living philosophers, Vol. VII, 3rd ed.). La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar
  15. Fuchs, C. A. (2016) Participatory realism. arXiv:1601.04360.
  16. Fuchs, C. A. (2017). Notwithstanding Bohr, the reasons for QBism. Mind and Matter, 15, 245–300.Google Scholar
  17. Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2015). QBism and the Greeks: Why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality. Physica Scripta, 90, 015104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuchs, C. A., & Stacey, B. C. (2016) QBist quantum mechanics: Quantum theory as a hero’s handbook. arXiv:1612.07308.
  19. Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D., & Schack, R. (2014). An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 82, 749–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furley, D. (1987). The Greek cosmologists (Volume 1: The formation of the atomic theory and its earliest critics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galilei, G. (2008). The essential Galileo (M. A. Finocchiaro, Edited and Trans.). Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  22. Gaukroger, S., Schuster, J., & Sutton, J. (Eds.). (2000). Descartes’ natural philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Hardcastle, V. G. (1997). The why of consciousness: A non-issue for materialists. In J. Shear (Ed.), Explaining consciousness—the ‘Hard Problem’. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hatfield, G. (2014). The Routledge guidebook to descartes’ meditations. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holland, P. R. (1993). The quantum theory of motion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huxley, T. (1866). Lessons on elementary physiology. New York: Macmillan and Company.Google Scholar
  27. Krips, H. (1986). Atomism, Poincaré and Planck. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 17, 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuhn, T. S. (1978). Black-body theory and the quantum discontinuity: 1884–1912. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Leibniz, G. W., & Strickland, L. (2014). Leibniz’s monadology: A new translation and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Machamer, P., & McGuire, J. E. (2009). Descartes’s changing mind. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mermin, N. D. (2018). Making better sense of quantum mechanics. arXiv:1809.01639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ryle, G. (2009). The concept of mind (sixtieth anniversary ed.). London/New York: Routledge. With a critical discussion by J. Tanney.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saunders, S., Barrett, J., Kent, A., & Wallace, D. (Eds.). (2010). Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Schuster, J. (2013). Descartes-Agonistes: Physico-mathematics, method and corpuscular-mechanism 1618–33. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shea, W. R. (1991). The magic of numbers and motion: The scientific career of René Descartes. New York: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, C. C. W. (1999). The atomists Leucippus and Democritus: Fragments, a text and translation with a commentary. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  37. Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 304, 81–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physics, Centre for Engineered Quantum SystemsThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced StudyMatielandSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations